The role of deltoid ligament repair in Weber B and C ankle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical, functional and radiographic results.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Giulia D'Andrea, Pietro Colombo, Giacomo Placella, Vincenzo Salini, Mattia Alessio-Mazzola
{"title":"The role of deltoid ligament repair in Weber B and C ankle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical, functional and radiographic results.","authors":"Giulia D'Andrea, Pietro Colombo, Giacomo Placella, Vincenzo Salini, Mattia Alessio-Mazzola","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The indications for deltoid ligament (DL) repair in ankle fractures are not well-defined. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical, radiographical, and functional outcomes related to DL repair in ankle fractures. Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and LILACS from January 1, 1990, to June 1, 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed level I to IV comparative studies of Weber B and/or C fractures with DL rupture, while level V studies were excluded. A total of 10 studies involving 585 patients were analyzed, with 258 undergoing DL repair and 327 receiving conservative treatment (no repair). The mean age of participants was 39.97 years, with a follow-up period averaging 23 months. The DL repair did not show a significant improvement in the AOFAS score as the primary outcome (p = 0.30). However, excluding the study by Jones et al. revealed a significant benefit in AOFAS scores at final follow-up (p = 0.02). Pain reduction assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) showed no significant difference (p = 0.22), nor did the infection rate (p = 0.68). Furthermore, patients with DL repair experienced significantly fewer reoperations for ankle instability (OR=0.08; p < 0.001) and exhibited a significant reduction in medial clear space on X-ray (MD=-0.45 mm; p < 0.001). This analysis provides updated evidence on DL management in Weber B and C fractures, indicating fewer reoperations and better radiographical outcomes despite a dubtful clinical advantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.06.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The indications for deltoid ligament (DL) repair in ankle fractures are not well-defined. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical, radiographical, and functional outcomes related to DL repair in ankle fractures. Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and LILACS from January 1, 1990, to June 1, 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed level I to IV comparative studies of Weber B and/or C fractures with DL rupture, while level V studies were excluded. A total of 10 studies involving 585 patients were analyzed, with 258 undergoing DL repair and 327 receiving conservative treatment (no repair). The mean age of participants was 39.97 years, with a follow-up period averaging 23 months. The DL repair did not show a significant improvement in the AOFAS score as the primary outcome (p = 0.30). However, excluding the study by Jones et al. revealed a significant benefit in AOFAS scores at final follow-up (p = 0.02). Pain reduction assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) showed no significant difference (p = 0.22), nor did the infection rate (p = 0.68). Furthermore, patients with DL repair experienced significantly fewer reoperations for ankle instability (OR=0.08; p < 0.001) and exhibited a significant reduction in medial clear space on X-ray (MD=-0.45 mm; p < 0.001). This analysis provides updated evidence on DL management in Weber B and C fractures, indicating fewer reoperations and better radiographical outcomes despite a dubtful clinical advantage.

三角韧带修复在Weber B型和C型踝关节骨折中的作用:临床、功能和影像学结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
踝关节骨折三角韧带(DL)修复的适应症并不明确。本荟萃分析旨在评估与踝关节骨折DL修复相关的临床、影像学和功能结果。按照Cochrane和PRISMA的指南,从1990年1月1日至2024年6月1日,在Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心(Central)、MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science)、ScienceDirect、CINAHL和LILACS进行了全面的文献检索。纳入标准包括韦伯B级和/或C级骨折伴DL破裂的I至IV级比较研究,而V级研究被排除。共分析了10项研究,涉及585例患者,其中258例接受DL修复,327例接受保守治疗(未修复)。参与者的平均年龄为39.97岁,随访时间平均为23个月。DL修复未显示AOFAS评分作为主要结果的显著改善(p=0.30)。然而,排除Jones等人的研究后发现,在最终随访时,AOFAS评分显著提高(p=0.02)。通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛减轻程度无显著差异(p=0.22),感染率也无显著差异(p=0.68)。此外,DL修复患者因踝关节不稳定再手术的次数显著减少(OR=0.08;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信