Using Shear Wave Elastography for Morphofunctional Analysis of Abdominal Muscles: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Sara Cañamero-de León, Mercedes Soto-González, Iria Da Cuña-Carrera, Augusto Gil Pascoal
{"title":"Using Shear Wave Elastography for Morphofunctional Analysis of Abdominal Muscles: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sara Cañamero-de León, Mercedes Soto-González, Iria Da Cuña-Carrera, Augusto Gil Pascoal","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review evaluates current research on the use of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in analyzing abdominal muscles, specifically the transversus abdominis, oblique muscles, and rectus abdominis. SWE is an advanced ultrasound technique that assesses tissue mechanical properties, offering detailed insights into tissue stiffness. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review included peer-reviewed studies on SWE of abdominal muscles in adults, excluding case studies, reviews, and studies on postmortem subjects or on non-abdominal tissues. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cinahl in April 2024, followed by a rigorous selection process involving two independent reviewers and a third reviewer to resolve discrepancies. Data extraction focused on study design, population characteristics, SWE methodology, and outcomes. The review included 27 studies. Out of these 27 studies, 11 were selected. The stiffness of the transversus abdominis at rest showed great variability, with propagation speeds ranging from 1.45 m/s to 2.3 m/s, being lower in healthy individuals compared to those with pathologies. The resting SWE values for the obliques were more homogeneous: between 1.40 and 1.54 m/s for the internal oblique and from 1.79 to 1.89 m/s for the external oblique in healthy adults, which increased in active individuals. For the rectus abdominis, the resting SWE values ranged from 1.61 m/s in women to 2.07 m/s in active young individuals. Although SWE is a relatively new technique for tissue assessment and there is no standard reference for the values obtained, its use in the study of abdominal musculature is promising, offering a non-invasive view of muscle stiffness. This review has identified several limitations, such as the lack of standardization in methodology, variability in the populations studied, and technical considerations that affect the measurements accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.04.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review evaluates current research on the use of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in analyzing abdominal muscles, specifically the transversus abdominis, oblique muscles, and rectus abdominis. SWE is an advanced ultrasound technique that assesses tissue mechanical properties, offering detailed insights into tissue stiffness. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review included peer-reviewed studies on SWE of abdominal muscles in adults, excluding case studies, reviews, and studies on postmortem subjects or on non-abdominal tissues. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cinahl in April 2024, followed by a rigorous selection process involving two independent reviewers and a third reviewer to resolve discrepancies. Data extraction focused on study design, population characteristics, SWE methodology, and outcomes. The review included 27 studies. Out of these 27 studies, 11 were selected. The stiffness of the transversus abdominis at rest showed great variability, with propagation speeds ranging from 1.45 m/s to 2.3 m/s, being lower in healthy individuals compared to those with pathologies. The resting SWE values for the obliques were more homogeneous: between 1.40 and 1.54 m/s for the internal oblique and from 1.79 to 1.89 m/s for the external oblique in healthy adults, which increased in active individuals. For the rectus abdominis, the resting SWE values ranged from 1.61 m/s in women to 2.07 m/s in active young individuals. Although SWE is a relatively new technique for tissue assessment and there is no standard reference for the values obtained, its use in the study of abdominal musculature is promising, offering a non-invasive view of muscle stiffness. This review has identified several limitations, such as the lack of standardization in methodology, variability in the populations studied, and technical considerations that affect the measurements accuracy.

横波弹性成像在腹肌形态功能分析中的应用综述。
这篇综述评估了目前使用剪切波弹性成像(SWE)分析腹部肌肉的研究,特别是腹横肌、斜肌和腹直肌。SWE是一种先进的超声技术,可评估组织机械性能,提供组织刚度的详细信息。遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,该综述纳入了关于成人腹肌SWE的同行评议研究,排除了病例研究、综述和对死后受试者或非腹部组织的研究。我们于2024年4月在PubMed、Medline、SPORTDiscus、Scopus、Web of Science和Cinahl进行了全面的检索,随后进行了严格的筛选过程,包括两名独立审稿人和一名第三方审稿人来解决差异。数据提取侧重于研究设计、人口特征、SWE方法和结果。该综述包括27项研究。从这27项研究中,选择了11项。静止时腹横肌的僵硬度表现出很大的变异性,其传播速度在1.45 m/s至2.3 m/s之间,健康个体的传播速度低于病变个体。斜肌的静息SWE值更为均匀:健康成人的内斜肌在1.40 ~ 1.54 m/s之间,外斜肌在1.79 ~ 1.89 m/s之间,在运动个体中增加。对于腹直肌,静息SWE值从女性的1.61 m/s到活跃的年轻人的2.07 m/s不等。虽然SWE是一种相对较新的组织评估技术,所获得的值没有标准参考,但它在腹部肌肉组织研究中的应用是有希望的,提供了一种无创的肌肉僵硬视图。这篇综述发现了一些局限性,例如方法缺乏标准化,研究人群的可变性,以及影响测量准确性的技术考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信