Haijun Xiao, Abhijith Sreejith, Iylan Howson, Alexander Aviles Cruz, Taylor Key, Jeffrey J Iliff, Muna Aryal
{"title":"Focused Ultrasound Enhances Glymphatic Transport Robustly Across Anesthesia Levels.","authors":"Haijun Xiao, Abhijith Sreejith, Iylan Howson, Alexander Aviles Cruz, Taylor Key, Jeffrey J Iliff, Muna Aryal","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We recently discovered that low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) can enhance glymphatic influx, the process by which the brain clears metabolic waste, in a rat model. The hypothesis is that ultrasound influences convective forces from arterial pulsations, aiding glymphatic transport. The initial study was conducted under approximately 2.5% isoflurane anesthesia, but it remains unclear how different anesthesia levels affect ultrasonic glymphatic influx as glymphatic function varies with physiological states. Hence, establishing standardized protocols for ultrasonic enhancement of glymphatic influx is crucial for ensuring consistent, reliable results across research labs during preclinical development. We aimed to investigate how different levels of isoflurane anesthesia affect ultrasonic enhancement of glymphatic influx for a model tracer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FUS (650 kHz, 0.2 MPa, duty cycle 7.7%, brain-wide for 10 min) was applied to rats under anesthesia levels ranging from 1.5% to 3.0%. A model tracer, 1 kDa-IRDye800 was used to assess glymphatic influx in ex-vivo brain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results demonstrated a significant main effect of FUS treatment (p = 7.70 × 10⁻⁷), indicating that FUS significantly enhanced glymphatic transport acoss all anesthesia levels. Anesthesia level also had a significant effect on glymphatic clearance (p = 7.45 × 10⁻¹¹), consistent with prior reports linking anesthetic depth to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. However, the interaction between treatment and anesthesia was not statistically significant (p = 0.106), suggesting that the efficacy of FUS was consistent across anesthesia levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the robustness of brain-wide FUS-induced glymphatic enhancement and highlight its potential as a modifiable therapeutic tool, independent of anesthetic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.06.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: We recently discovered that low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) can enhance glymphatic influx, the process by which the brain clears metabolic waste, in a rat model. The hypothesis is that ultrasound influences convective forces from arterial pulsations, aiding glymphatic transport. The initial study was conducted under approximately 2.5% isoflurane anesthesia, but it remains unclear how different anesthesia levels affect ultrasonic glymphatic influx as glymphatic function varies with physiological states. Hence, establishing standardized protocols for ultrasonic enhancement of glymphatic influx is crucial for ensuring consistent, reliable results across research labs during preclinical development. We aimed to investigate how different levels of isoflurane anesthesia affect ultrasonic enhancement of glymphatic influx for a model tracer.
Methods: FUS (650 kHz, 0.2 MPa, duty cycle 7.7%, brain-wide for 10 min) was applied to rats under anesthesia levels ranging from 1.5% to 3.0%. A model tracer, 1 kDa-IRDye800 was used to assess glymphatic influx in ex-vivo brain.
Results: Results demonstrated a significant main effect of FUS treatment (p = 7.70 × 10⁻⁷), indicating that FUS significantly enhanced glymphatic transport acoss all anesthesia levels. Anesthesia level also had a significant effect on glymphatic clearance (p = 7.45 × 10⁻¹¹), consistent with prior reports linking anesthetic depth to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. However, the interaction between treatment and anesthesia was not statistically significant (p = 0.106), suggesting that the efficacy of FUS was consistent across anesthesia levels.
Conclusion: These findings support the robustness of brain-wide FUS-induced glymphatic enhancement and highlight its potential as a modifiable therapeutic tool, independent of anesthetic conditions.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.