Focused Ultrasound Enhances Glymphatic Transport Robustly Across Anesthesia Levels.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Haijun Xiao, Abhijith Sreejith, Iylan Howson, Alexander Aviles Cruz, Taylor Key, Jeffrey J Iliff, Muna Aryal
{"title":"Focused Ultrasound Enhances Glymphatic Transport Robustly Across Anesthesia Levels.","authors":"Haijun Xiao, Abhijith Sreejith, Iylan Howson, Alexander Aviles Cruz, Taylor Key, Jeffrey J Iliff, Muna Aryal","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We recently discovered that low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) can enhance glymphatic influx, the process by which the brain clears metabolic waste, in a rat model. The hypothesis is that ultrasound influences convective forces from arterial pulsations, aiding glymphatic transport. The initial study was conducted under approximately 2.5% isoflurane anesthesia, but it remains unclear how different anesthesia levels affect ultrasonic glymphatic influx as glymphatic function varies with physiological states. Hence, establishing standardized protocols for ultrasonic enhancement of glymphatic influx is crucial for ensuring consistent, reliable results across research labs during preclinical development. We aimed to investigate how different levels of isoflurane anesthesia affect ultrasonic enhancement of glymphatic influx for a model tracer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FUS (650 kHz, 0.2 MPa, duty cycle 7.7%, brain-wide for 10 min) was applied to rats under anesthesia levels ranging from 1.5% to 3.0%. A model tracer, 1 kDa-IRDye800 was used to assess glymphatic influx in ex-vivo brain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results demonstrated a significant main effect of FUS treatment (p = 7.70 × 10⁻⁷), indicating that FUS significantly enhanced glymphatic transport acoss all anesthesia levels. Anesthesia level also had a significant effect on glymphatic clearance (p = 7.45 × 10⁻¹¹), consistent with prior reports linking anesthetic depth to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. However, the interaction between treatment and anesthesia was not statistically significant (p = 0.106), suggesting that the efficacy of FUS was consistent across anesthesia levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the robustness of brain-wide FUS-induced glymphatic enhancement and highlight its potential as a modifiable therapeutic tool, independent of anesthetic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.06.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We recently discovered that low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) can enhance glymphatic influx, the process by which the brain clears metabolic waste, in a rat model. The hypothesis is that ultrasound influences convective forces from arterial pulsations, aiding glymphatic transport. The initial study was conducted under approximately 2.5% isoflurane anesthesia, but it remains unclear how different anesthesia levels affect ultrasonic glymphatic influx as glymphatic function varies with physiological states. Hence, establishing standardized protocols for ultrasonic enhancement of glymphatic influx is crucial for ensuring consistent, reliable results across research labs during preclinical development. We aimed to investigate how different levels of isoflurane anesthesia affect ultrasonic enhancement of glymphatic influx for a model tracer.

Methods: FUS (650 kHz, 0.2 MPa, duty cycle 7.7%, brain-wide for 10 min) was applied to rats under anesthesia levels ranging from 1.5% to 3.0%. A model tracer, 1 kDa-IRDye800 was used to assess glymphatic influx in ex-vivo brain.

Results: Results demonstrated a significant main effect of FUS treatment (p = 7.70 × 10⁻⁷), indicating that FUS significantly enhanced glymphatic transport acoss all anesthesia levels. Anesthesia level also had a significant effect on glymphatic clearance (p = 7.45 × 10⁻¹¹), consistent with prior reports linking anesthetic depth to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. However, the interaction between treatment and anesthesia was not statistically significant (p = 0.106), suggesting that the efficacy of FUS was consistent across anesthesia levels.

Conclusion: These findings support the robustness of brain-wide FUS-induced glymphatic enhancement and highlight its potential as a modifiable therapeutic tool, independent of anesthetic conditions.

聚焦超声在麻醉水平上增强淋巴运输。
目的:我们最近在大鼠模型中发现,低强度经颅聚焦超声(FUS)可以增强淋巴内流,这是大脑清除代谢废物的过程。假设是超声影响来自动脉搏动的对流力,帮助淋巴运输。最初的研究是在约2.5%异氟醚麻醉下进行的,但由于淋巴功能随生理状态而变化,不同麻醉水平对超声淋巴内流的影响尚不清楚。因此,建立超声增强淋巴内流的标准化方案对于确保临床前开发过程中研究实验室一致、可靠的结果至关重要。我们的目的是研究不同水平的异氟醚麻醉如何影响超声增强淋巴内流模型示踪剂。方法:大鼠在1.5% ~ 3.0%麻醉水平下施加FUS (650 kHz, 0.2 MPa,占空比7.7%,脑宽10 min)。模型示踪剂1 kDa-IRDye800用于评估离体脑淋巴内流。结果:结果显示了FUS治疗的显著主要效果(p = 7.70 × 10⁻),表明FUS显著增强了所有麻醉水平的淋巴运输。麻醉水平对淋巴清除也有显著的影响(p = 7.45 × 10⁻¹¹),这与之前关于麻醉深度与脑脊液动力学的报道相一致。然而,治疗和麻醉之间的相互作用没有统计学意义(p = 0.106),这表明FUS的疗效在麻醉水平上是一致的。结论:这些发现支持fus诱导的全脑淋巴增强的稳健性,并强调其作为一种独立于麻醉条件的可修改治疗工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信