Including Empirical Prior Information in the Reliable Change Index.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
R Philip Chalmers, Sarah Campbell
{"title":"Including Empirical Prior Information in the Reliable Change Index.","authors":"R Philip Chalmers, Sarah Campbell","doi":"10.1177/01466216251358492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reliable change index (RCI; Jacobson & Truax, 1991) is commonly used to assess whether individuals have changed across two measurement occasions, and has seen many augmentations and improvements since its initial conception. In this study, we extend an item response theory version of the RCI presented by Jabrayilov et al. (2016) by including empirical priors in the associated RCI computations whenever group-level differences are quantifiable given post-test response information. Based on a reanalysis and extension of a previous simulation study, we demonstrate that although a small amount of bias is added to the estimates of the latent trait differences when no true change is present, including empirical prior information will generally improve the Type I behavior of the model-based RCI. Consequently, when non-zero changes in the latent trait are present the bias and sampling variability are show to be more favorable than competing estimators, subsequently leading to an increase in power to detect non-zero changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":" ","pages":"01466216251358492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216251358492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reliable change index (RCI; Jacobson & Truax, 1991) is commonly used to assess whether individuals have changed across two measurement occasions, and has seen many augmentations and improvements since its initial conception. In this study, we extend an item response theory version of the RCI presented by Jabrayilov et al. (2016) by including empirical priors in the associated RCI computations whenever group-level differences are quantifiable given post-test response information. Based on a reanalysis and extension of a previous simulation study, we demonstrate that although a small amount of bias is added to the estimates of the latent trait differences when no true change is present, including empirical prior information will generally improve the Type I behavior of the model-based RCI. Consequently, when non-zero changes in the latent trait are present the bias and sampling variability are show to be more favorable than competing estimators, subsequently leading to an increase in power to detect non-zero changes.

在可靠变化指数中加入经验先验信息。
可靠变化指数(RCI;Jacobson & Truax, 1991)通常用于评估个体是否在两个测量场合中发生了变化,并且自最初的概念以来已经看到了许多增强和改进。在本研究中,我们扩展了Jabrayilov等人(2016)提出的RCI的项目反应理论版本,在给定测试后反应信息的情况下,无论群体水平差异是可量化的,我们都会在相关的RCI计算中纳入经验先验。基于先前模拟研究的再分析和扩展,我们证明,尽管在没有真实变化的情况下,潜在特征差异的估计中添加了少量偏差,但包括经验先验信息通常会改善基于模型的RCI的I型行为。因此,当潜在特征的非零变化存在时,偏差和抽样可变性比竞争估计器更有利,随后导致检测非零变化的能力增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信