The value of black-blood MRI in cerebral venous thrombosis diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 0.8 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Ali Akhavi Milani, Saba Mehrtabar, Javad Jalili
{"title":"The value of black-blood MRI in cerebral venous thrombosis diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ali Akhavi Milani, Saba Mehrtabar, Javad Jalili","doi":"10.1177/19714009251360558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of black-blood MRI (BB-MRI) in detecting cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT).MethodsThis study was registered in PROSPERO [ID: CRD42024556451]. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for studies evaluating the performance of BB-MRI in diagnosing CVT. Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate random-effects model to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).ResultsNine studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the review; however, two studies insufficiently reported quantitative data. Thus, seven studies involving 176 CVT patients and 217 controls, encompassing 610 thrombosed and 3279 normal cerebral venous segments, were included in the meta-analysis. The studies demonstrated a high risk of bias in the patient selection and reference standard domains. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of BB-MRI were 96% [95% CI: 92%-98%] and 96% [95% CI: 93%-98%] on a patient-based level, and 92% [95% CI: 87%-95%] and 98% [95% CI: 92%-99%] on a venous-segment-based level, respectively. The AUC was 0.98 for patient-based data and 0.96 for venous-segment-based data.ConclusionsBB-MRI demonstrates a significant potential as a diagnostic method for CVT. However, further comparative studies are needed to define its role in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of having CVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251360558"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251360558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of black-blood MRI (BB-MRI) in detecting cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT).MethodsThis study was registered in PROSPERO [ID: CRD42024556451]. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for studies evaluating the performance of BB-MRI in diagnosing CVT. Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate random-effects model to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).ResultsNine studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the review; however, two studies insufficiently reported quantitative data. Thus, seven studies involving 176 CVT patients and 217 controls, encompassing 610 thrombosed and 3279 normal cerebral venous segments, were included in the meta-analysis. The studies demonstrated a high risk of bias in the patient selection and reference standard domains. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of BB-MRI were 96% [95% CI: 92%-98%] and 96% [95% CI: 93%-98%] on a patient-based level, and 92% [95% CI: 87%-95%] and 98% [95% CI: 92%-99%] on a venous-segment-based level, respectively. The AUC was 0.98 for patient-based data and 0.96 for venous-segment-based data.ConclusionsBB-MRI demonstrates a significant potential as a diagnostic method for CVT. However, further comparative studies are needed to define its role in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of having CVT.

黑血MRI在脑静脉血栓诊断中的价值:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的评价黑血MRI (BB-MRI)对脑静脉血栓(CVT)的诊断价值。方法本研究已在PROSPERO注册[ID: CRD42024556451]。检索PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus和Embase数据库,以评估BB-MRI诊断CVT的性能。研究是根据预先确定的资格标准选择的。使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险。采用双变量随机效应模型进行meta分析,计算合并敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。结果9项研究符合入选标准,纳入本综述;然而,两项研究没有充分报告定量数据。因此,荟萃分析纳入了7项研究,涉及176名CVT患者和217名对照,包括610个血栓形成的脑静脉段和3279个正常的脑静脉段。研究表明,在患者选择和参考标准领域存在较高的偏倚风险。BB-MRI在患者水平上的敏感性和特异性分别为96% [95% CI: 92%-98%]和96% [95% CI: 93%-98%],在静脉段水平上的敏感性和特异性分别为92% [95% CI: 87%-95%]和98% [95% CI: 92%-99%]。基于患者数据的AUC为0.98,基于静脉段数据的AUC为0.96。结论bb - mri作为CVT的诊断方法具有重要的潜力。然而,需要进一步的比较研究来确定其在疑似CVT患者的诊断检查中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信