The Association Between Daily Step Count, Step Frequency and the Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES Data.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lindong Yuan, Zhen Tian, Xiaodong Jia, Zhe Chen
{"title":"The Association Between Daily Step Count, Step Frequency and the Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES Data.","authors":"Lindong Yuan, Zhen Tian, Xiaodong Jia, Zhe Chen","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S523574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major public health concern globally, and physical activity is considered a modifiable factor in its prevention.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the association between daily step count, step frequency, and the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using nationally representative data.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from adults aged ≥40 years in the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants wore accelerometers for 7 days to measure daily step count and three step frequency indicators: bout cadence, peak 30-minute cadence, and peak 1-minute cadence (steps/minute). Weighted logistic regression was used to assess associations with COPD, adjusting for demographic, behavioral, and health-related covariates. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted to confirm robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3690 participants (representing ~26.8 million US adults), higher daily step count and step frequency were inversely associated with COPD prevalence. Compared to those taking <4000 steps/day, those taking ≥8000 steps/day had a 63% lower odds of COPD (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.91; P for trend <0.001). Higher bout cadence (92.3-153.4 steps/minute) and peak 30-minute cadence (69.8-128.2 steps/minute) were also associated with significantly reduced COPD odds (ORs 0.30 and 0.33, respectively). Combined higher step count and frequency yielded a greater risk reduction. Restricted cubic splines indicated a nonlinear association, and ROC analysis showed moderate discriminatory power (AUC 0.71-0.75). Results remained robust in sensitivity analyses and across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of US adults, higher daily step counts and greater walking cadence were associated with a lower prevalence of COPD. These findings support the relevance of step-based metrics in assessing COPD risk, although longitudinal studies are needed to establish causality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"2325-2335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S523574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major public health concern globally, and physical activity is considered a modifiable factor in its prevention.

Purpose: This study examined the association between daily step count, step frequency, and the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using nationally representative data.

Patients and methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from adults aged ≥40 years in the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants wore accelerometers for 7 days to measure daily step count and three step frequency indicators: bout cadence, peak 30-minute cadence, and peak 1-minute cadence (steps/minute). Weighted logistic regression was used to assess associations with COPD, adjusting for demographic, behavioral, and health-related covariates. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted to confirm robustness.

Results: Among 3690 participants (representing ~26.8 million US adults), higher daily step count and step frequency were inversely associated with COPD prevalence. Compared to those taking <4000 steps/day, those taking ≥8000 steps/day had a 63% lower odds of COPD (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.91; P for trend <0.001). Higher bout cadence (92.3-153.4 steps/minute) and peak 30-minute cadence (69.8-128.2 steps/minute) were also associated with significantly reduced COPD odds (ORs 0.30 and 0.33, respectively). Combined higher step count and frequency yielded a greater risk reduction. Restricted cubic splines indicated a nonlinear association, and ROC analysis showed moderate discriminatory power (AUC 0.71-0.75). Results remained robust in sensitivity analyses and across subgroups.

Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study of US adults, higher daily step counts and greater walking cadence were associated with a lower prevalence of COPD. These findings support the relevance of step-based metrics in assessing COPD risk, although longitudinal studies are needed to establish causality.

每日步数、步频与慢性阻塞性肺疾病风险之间的关系:一项使用NHANES数据的横断面研究
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是全球主要的公共卫生问题,体育活动被认为是预防COPD的一个可改变因素。目的:本研究利用具有全国代表性的数据,探讨每日步数、步频和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患病率之间的关系。患者和方法:对2003-2006年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)中年龄≥40岁的成年人的数据进行横断面分析。参与者佩戴加速度计7天,测量每日步数和三个步频指标:约步节奏、峰值30分钟节奏和峰值1分钟节奏(步数/分钟)。采用加权逻辑回归评估COPD与人口统计学、行为学和健康相关协变量的相关性。进行敏感性分析和亚组分析以证实稳健性。结果:在3690名参与者中(代表约2680万美国成年人),较高的每日步数和步频与COPD患病率呈负相关。结论:在这项针对美国成年人的横断面研究中,较高的每日步数和较大的步行节奏与较低的COPD患病率相关。这些发现支持基于步骤的指标在评估COPD风险中的相关性,尽管需要纵向研究来确定因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信