Repetitive Negative Thinking in University Students with Specific Learning Disorder: Does Gender Matter?

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maristella Scorza, Michela Camia, Erika Benassi, Damiano Angelini, Angela Ciaramidaro, Sara Giovagnoli
{"title":"Repetitive Negative Thinking in University Students with Specific Learning Disorder: Does Gender Matter?","authors":"Maristella Scorza, Michela Camia, Erika Benassi, Damiano Angelini, Angela Ciaramidaro, Sara Giovagnoli","doi":"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To date, the literature on repetitive negative thinking (RNT), rumination and worry, in students with Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) is still scant. This study seeks to deeply examine those variables in university students with and without SLD, focusing on the differences between males and females.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey was administered to 107 university students between 18 and 31 years (mean age=21,56; SD=2,60). Of these, 65 were typically developing (TD) and 42 had a diagnosis of SLD. Participants responded to the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) and the Penn-State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). Anxious and depressive symptoms were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were found between university students with and without SLD on all the scales except for PSWQ. Regression analyses reported that rumination significantly affected depression and anxiety whereas worry seemed to have a role only in anxiety. Finally, female students with SLD showed higher levels of internalizing symptoms among all the subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results give psychologists a greater understanding of RNT in university students with SLD, suggesting the importance of including those psychological processes in the clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46700,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","volume":"22 2","pages":"141-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12253856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To date, the literature on repetitive negative thinking (RNT), rumination and worry, in students with Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) is still scant. This study seeks to deeply examine those variables in university students with and without SLD, focusing on the differences between males and females.

Method: A survey was administered to 107 university students between 18 and 31 years (mean age=21,56; SD=2,60). Of these, 65 were typically developing (TD) and 42 had a diagnosis of SLD. Participants responded to the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) and the Penn-State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). Anxious and depressive symptoms were also assessed.

Results: Significant differences were found between university students with and without SLD on all the scales except for PSWQ. Regression analyses reported that rumination significantly affected depression and anxiety whereas worry seemed to have a role only in anxiety. Finally, female students with SLD showed higher levels of internalizing symptoms among all the subjects.

Conclusions: The results give psychologists a greater understanding of RNT in university students with SLD, suggesting the importance of including those psychological processes in the clinical assessment.

特殊学习障碍大学生重复性消极思维:性别影响吗?
目的:迄今为止,关于重复性消极思维(RNT)、反刍和焦虑在特殊学习障碍(SLD)学生中的作用的文献仍然很少。本研究旨在深入研究这些变量在大学生有和没有特殊障碍,重点是男性和女性之间的差异。方法:对107名18 ~ 31岁的大学生(平均年龄21,56岁;SD = 2, 60)。其中,65例为典型发展(TD), 42例被诊断为SLD。参与者对反思反应量表(RRS)和宾夕法尼亚州立大学焦虑问卷(PSWQ)进行了回应。焦虑和抑郁症状也被评估。结果:除PSWQ外,重度抑郁大学生与非重度抑郁大学生在所有量表上均存在显著差异。回归分析表明,反刍对抑郁和焦虑有显著影响,而担忧似乎只对焦虑有影响。最后,女学生在所有被试中表现出较高的内化症状。结论:本研究结果使心理学家对大学生特殊障碍患者的RNT有了更深入的了解,提示在临床评估中纳入这些心理过程的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Clinical Neuropsychiatry CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信