Serologic investigation and management of an antibody screen negative para-Bombay phenotype during pregnancy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI:10.1111/tme.70000
Yaseen Ali Jamal, Joshua Alston Nicholas, Tong Wang, Mohamed Abdelmonem, Suchitra Pandey, Mrigender Singh Virk
{"title":"Serologic investigation and management of an antibody screen negative para-Bombay phenotype during pregnancy.","authors":"Yaseen Ali Jamal, Joshua Alston Nicholas, Tong Wang, Mohamed Abdelmonem, Suchitra Pandey, Mrigender Singh Virk","doi":"10.1111/tme.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with Bombay and para-Bombay red blood cell (RBC) phenotypes produce anti-H antibodies associated with acute haemolytic transfusion reactions. The rarity of compatible donor units creates unique logistical challenges, especially during pregnancy as the onset of labour and fetal distress can occur without warning.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 24-year-old female at 38 weeks gestation presented with breech fetal position and reported anti-H antibodies. Critically, the in-house antibody screen was negative by automated solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA), while manual testing subsequently demonstrated anti-H antibodies. Forward typing with Ulex europaeus lectin confirmed the absence of H-antigen on RBCs, while Lewis phenotyping and saliva neutralisation revealed H-antigen in secretions, consistent with the para-Bombay phenotype. Three frozen Bombay RBC units were obtained from a nationwide search, and four cross-match compatible non-Bombay (O-positive) units were also prepared. An external cephalic version (ECV) was originally planned since vaginal delivery carries lower bleeding risk than caesarean section (CS). However, acknowledging the unpredictability of ECV, the challenge of timing thawed units, and the possibilities of massive haemorrhage versus wasting rare donor blood, an elective CS was ultimately preferred. Delivery was uneventful without transfusion needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights key considerations regarding serologic identification, blood product management, and interdisciplinary clinical decision-making for patients with Bombay and para-Bombay phenotypes. First, automated SPRCA testing may provide false negative results for anti-H antibodies. Second, backup transfusion strategies for para-Bombay patients may include non-Bombay RBCs. Finally, the procurement, preparation, and use of rare blood products requires thoughtful deliberation between multiple care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"399-402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with Bombay and para-Bombay red blood cell (RBC) phenotypes produce anti-H antibodies associated with acute haemolytic transfusion reactions. The rarity of compatible donor units creates unique logistical challenges, especially during pregnancy as the onset of labour and fetal distress can occur without warning.

Case report: A 24-year-old female at 38 weeks gestation presented with breech fetal position and reported anti-H antibodies. Critically, the in-house antibody screen was negative by automated solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA), while manual testing subsequently demonstrated anti-H antibodies. Forward typing with Ulex europaeus lectin confirmed the absence of H-antigen on RBCs, while Lewis phenotyping and saliva neutralisation revealed H-antigen in secretions, consistent with the para-Bombay phenotype. Three frozen Bombay RBC units were obtained from a nationwide search, and four cross-match compatible non-Bombay (O-positive) units were also prepared. An external cephalic version (ECV) was originally planned since vaginal delivery carries lower bleeding risk than caesarean section (CS). However, acknowledging the unpredictability of ECV, the challenge of timing thawed units, and the possibilities of massive haemorrhage versus wasting rare donor blood, an elective CS was ultimately preferred. Delivery was uneventful without transfusion needs.

Conclusion: This case highlights key considerations regarding serologic identification, blood product management, and interdisciplinary clinical decision-making for patients with Bombay and para-Bombay phenotypes. First, automated SPRCA testing may provide false negative results for anti-H antibodies. Second, backup transfusion strategies for para-Bombay patients may include non-Bombay RBCs. Finally, the procurement, preparation, and use of rare blood products requires thoughtful deliberation between multiple care providers.

妊娠期抗体筛查阴性类孟买表型的血清学调查和处理。
背景:孟买和类孟买红细胞(RBC)表型的个体产生与急性溶血性输血反应相关的抗h抗体。兼容供体单位的罕见造成了独特的后勤挑战,特别是在怀孕期间,因为分娩和胎儿窘迫可能在没有警告的情况下发生。病例报告:一位24岁的女性,孕38周时出现臀位,并报告了抗h抗体。关键是,内部抗体筛选通过自动固相红细胞粘附(SPRCA)是阴性的,而人工测试随后显示抗h抗体。用欧paeus凝集素进行正向分型证实红细胞上不存在h抗原,而Lewis表型和唾液中和显示分泌物中存在h抗原,与类孟买表型一致。从全国范围内搜索获得三个冷冻孟买红细胞单位,并准备了四个交叉匹配兼容的非孟买(o阳性)单位。由于阴道分娩比剖宫产出血风险更低,因此最初计划采用体外头位分娩(ECV)。然而,考虑到ECV的不可预测性,解冻时间的挑战,以及大出血与浪费罕见供体血液的可能性,选择性CS最终成为首选。分娩过程很顺利,没有输血。结论:本病例强调了孟买型和类孟买型患者在血清学鉴定、血液制品管理和跨学科临床决策方面的关键考虑。首先,自动SPRCA检测可能会对抗h抗体产生假阴性结果。其次,准孟买患者的后备输血策略可能包括非孟买红细胞。最后,稀有血液制品的采购、制备和使用需要多个护理提供者之间的深思熟虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine
Transfusion Medicine 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology. In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信