Effect of gastric juice on the surface, optical, and mechanical properties of different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing dental ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lorena Scaion Silva, Victor Augusto Alves Bento, Kevin Henrique Cruz, Victor Alves Nascimento, Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
{"title":"Effect of gastric juice on the surface, optical, and mechanical properties of different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing dental ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lorena Scaion Silva, Victor Augusto Alves Bento, Kevin Henrique Cruz, Victor Alves Nascimento, Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_81_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Effect of an erosive challenge on the surface, optical, and mechanical properties of prostheses manufactured using different types of dental ceramics for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Protocol followed PRISMA guidelines. A PICO question was formulated: \"What is the effect of gastric juice on the surface, optical and mechanical properties of different types of dental ceramics made using the CAD/CAM system?.\" PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest was search to July 2024. The quality of the full-text articles was evaluated for Joanna Briggs Institute critical. The meta-analysis was the inverse variance method (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying the selection criteria, 15 in vitro studies published between 2014 and 2022, 777 specimens were included. Fourteen studies were included in meta-analysis, which no significant difference in the surface roughness after the erosive challenge was observed between the ceramic types (P = 0.59; MD: 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.36-0.64; I2 = 86%, P < 0.01), significantly less color change was observed without the erosive challenge (P < 0.05; MD: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.86-2.79; I2 = 81%, P < 0.01), and significantly lower microhardness was observed for the groups with the erosive challenge (P = 0.03; MD: -0.95; 95% CI: -1.82--0.08; I2 = 88%, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ceramics showed changes in roughness, color stability, microhardness and flexural strength, depending on the type of ceramic.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"25 2","pages":"109-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_81_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Effect of an erosive challenge on the surface, optical, and mechanical properties of prostheses manufactured using different types of dental ceramics for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM).
Materials and methods: Protocol followed PRISMA guidelines. A PICO question was formulated: "What is the effect of gastric juice on the surface, optical and mechanical properties of different types of dental ceramics made using the CAD/CAM system?." PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest was search to July 2024. The quality of the full-text articles was evaluated for Joanna Briggs Institute critical. The meta-analysis was the inverse variance method (P < 0.05).
Results: After applying the selection criteria, 15 in vitro studies published between 2014 and 2022, 777 specimens were included. Fourteen studies were included in meta-analysis, which no significant difference in the surface roughness after the erosive challenge was observed between the ceramic types (P = 0.59; MD: 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.36-0.64; I2 = 86%, P < 0.01), significantly less color change was observed without the erosive challenge (P < 0.05; MD: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.86-2.79; I2 = 81%, P < 0.01), and significantly lower microhardness was observed for the groups with the erosive challenge (P = 0.03; MD: -0.95; 95% CI: -1.82--0.08; I2 = 88%, P < 0.01).
Conclusions: The ceramics showed changes in roughness, color stability, microhardness and flexural strength, depending on the type of ceramic.