{"title":"Dietary Patterns Associated With Anti-inflammatory Effects: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.","authors":"Gynette L Reyneke, Kelly Lambert, Eleanor J Beck","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Noncommunicable diseases significantly impact global health, and chronic inflammation is a common pathological feature of these conditions. The relationship between chronic inflammation and dietary intake is increasingly evident, as emerging research elucidates the inflammation-modulating effects of diet.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This umbrella review aimed to systematically collect, summarize, and assess current evidence on the relationship between dietary patterns and inflammatory biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1990 through March 19, 2025.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention trials and observational studies that assessed the effects or associations of dietary patterns on chronic inflammatory markers were selected. Data extraction, methodological quality assessment, and evaluation of the strength of evidence were independently conducted by 2 authors.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Thirty reviews representing 225 eligible primary studies were included. Fifteen dietary patterns were assessed against a range of inflammatory marker outcomes, reported in 60 unique meta-analyses and 61 narrative syntheses. The findings indicate significant effects and overall beneficial association between the Mediterranean diet and the levels of inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6, and adiponectin, with the certainty of evidence (CoE) ranging from high to low. Additionally, a significant inverse association was identified between a vegetarian diet and CRP levels, with low to very low CoE. The findings for other dietary patterns assessed were inconclusive or limited due to the paucity of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Mediterranean and vegetarian dietary patterns may ameliorate low-grade inflammation in adult populations with at least one chronic condition. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential inflammation-modulating effects of other dietary patterns, considering the significant heterogeneity of comparator diets.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO no. CRD42023472469.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Noncommunicable diseases significantly impact global health, and chronic inflammation is a common pathological feature of these conditions. The relationship between chronic inflammation and dietary intake is increasingly evident, as emerging research elucidates the inflammation-modulating effects of diet.
Objective: This umbrella review aimed to systematically collect, summarize, and assess current evidence on the relationship between dietary patterns and inflammatory biomarkers.
Data sources: The CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1990 through March 19, 2025.
Data extraction: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention trials and observational studies that assessed the effects or associations of dietary patterns on chronic inflammatory markers were selected. Data extraction, methodological quality assessment, and evaluation of the strength of evidence were independently conducted by 2 authors.
Data analysis: Thirty reviews representing 225 eligible primary studies were included. Fifteen dietary patterns were assessed against a range of inflammatory marker outcomes, reported in 60 unique meta-analyses and 61 narrative syntheses. The findings indicate significant effects and overall beneficial association between the Mediterranean diet and the levels of inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6, and adiponectin, with the certainty of evidence (CoE) ranging from high to low. Additionally, a significant inverse association was identified between a vegetarian diet and CRP levels, with low to very low CoE. The findings for other dietary patterns assessed were inconclusive or limited due to the paucity of studies.
Conclusion: The Mediterranean and vegetarian dietary patterns may ameliorate low-grade inflammation in adult populations with at least one chronic condition. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential inflammation-modulating effects of other dietary patterns, considering the significant heterogeneity of comparator diets.
背景:非传染性疾病显著影响全球健康,慢性炎症是这些疾病的共同病理特征。慢性炎症和饮食摄入之间的关系越来越明显,因为新的研究阐明了饮食的炎症调节作用。目的:本综述旨在系统地收集、总结和评估饮食模式与炎症生物标志物之间关系的现有证据。数据来源:检索自1990年至2025年3月19日的CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库。数据提取:系统回顾和荟萃分析了评估饮食模式对慢性炎症标志物的影响或关联的干预试验和观察性研究。数据提取、方法学质量评估和证据强度评估由2位作者独立进行。数据分析:纳入30篇综述,225项符合条件的初步研究。根据一系列炎症标志物结果评估了15种饮食模式,这些结果在60项独特的荟萃分析和61项叙事综合中报告。研究结果表明,地中海饮食与炎症标志物c反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6和脂联素水平之间存在显著影响和总体有益关联,证据确定性(CoE)从高到低不等。此外,素食饮食和CRP水平之间存在显著的负相关,低至极低的CoE。由于研究的缺乏,对其他饮食模式的评估结果是不确定的或有限的。结论:地中海和素食饮食模式可以改善患有至少一种慢性疾病的成年人的低度炎症。考虑到比较饮食的显著异质性,需要进一步的研究来评估其他饮食模式的潜在炎症调节作用。系统评审注册:普洛斯彼罗号。CRD42023472469。
期刊介绍:
Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.