Provider Experiences With Systematically Administered Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Sub-Study.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200486
Nathan Y Chu, Aila Jamali, Yazid N Al Hamarneh, Kaitlyn E Watson, Ross T Tsuyuki, Penelope S Smyth
{"title":"Provider Experiences With Systematically Administered Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Sub-Study.","authors":"Nathan Y Chu, Aila Jamali, Yazid N Al Hamarneh, Kaitlyn E Watson, Ross T Tsuyuki, Penelope S Smyth","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>There has been interest in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to capture and systematically assess patients' perceptions of their multiple sclerosis (MS) experience and feed this information back to the clinician, but PROMs are not routinely used in MS outpatient clinics. We explored the perspectives of providers caring for persons with MS (PwMS) on the integration of PROMs into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative substudy of a separate randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0497954) examining the effect of PROM use on depression and anxiety levels in PwMS. We conducted semistructured interviews with 10 providers caring for participants enrolled in the study and explored their experiences using PROMs with PwMS. Thematic analysis through a mixed inductive and deductive approach was performed using verbatim interview transcriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven neurologists, 2 specialty MS nurse practitioners, and 1 MS registered nurse were interviewed. Providers expressed several facilitating factors with PROM usage, including engaging with patient-specific symptoms, initiating patient goal setting, and improving visit efficiency and patient satisfaction. However, providers also expressed barriers such as clinical workflow disruptions and technological barriers, skepticism toward the validity of results, and moral/ethical obligations to information gained from PROMs. Future opportunities elicited were the introduction of previsit PROMs and direct integration of PROMs into the electronic health record.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>From an MS provider's perspective, PROMs offer useful information but barriers continue to exist. PROMs have promise as an adjunct tool in the care of PwMS to optimize their functioning and experiences as health care system users, and these results may inform future strategic implementation of routine PROMs in MS clinics.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>This trial was registered on July 28, 2021, at the NIH United States National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical Trial ID: NCT04979546.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12253963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: There has been interest in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to capture and systematically assess patients' perceptions of their multiple sclerosis (MS) experience and feed this information back to the clinician, but PROMs are not routinely used in MS outpatient clinics. We explored the perspectives of providers caring for persons with MS (PwMS) on the integration of PROMs into clinical practice.

Methods: This was a qualitative substudy of a separate randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0497954) examining the effect of PROM use on depression and anxiety levels in PwMS. We conducted semistructured interviews with 10 providers caring for participants enrolled in the study and explored their experiences using PROMs with PwMS. Thematic analysis through a mixed inductive and deductive approach was performed using verbatim interview transcriptions.

Results: Seven neurologists, 2 specialty MS nurse practitioners, and 1 MS registered nurse were interviewed. Providers expressed several facilitating factors with PROM usage, including engaging with patient-specific symptoms, initiating patient goal setting, and improving visit efficiency and patient satisfaction. However, providers also expressed barriers such as clinical workflow disruptions and technological barriers, skepticism toward the validity of results, and moral/ethical obligations to information gained from PROMs. Future opportunities elicited were the introduction of previsit PROMs and direct integration of PROMs into the electronic health record.

Discussion: From an MS provider's perspective, PROMs offer useful information but barriers continue to exist. PROMs have promise as an adjunct tool in the care of PwMS to optimize their functioning and experiences as health care system users, and these results may inform future strategic implementation of routine PROMs in MS clinics.

Trial registration information: This trial was registered on July 28, 2021, at the NIH United States National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical Trial ID: NCT04979546.

在多发性硬化症中系统管理的患者报告结果测量的提供者经验:一个定性的子研究。
背景和目的:人们一直对使用患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)来捕获和系统地评估患者对其多发性硬化症(MS)经历的看法并将这些信息反馈给临床医生感兴趣,但PROMs并没有在MS门诊诊所常规使用。我们探讨的观点,提供者照顾的人与MS (PwMS)的整合到临床实践的PROMs。方法:这是一项单独的随机对照试验(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0497954)的定性亚研究,该试验旨在检查PROM使用对PwMS患者抑郁和焦虑水平的影响。我们对10位参与研究的医疗服务提供者进行了半结构化访谈,并探讨了他们使用PROMs和PwMS的经验。主题分析通过混合归纳和演绎的方法进行使用逐字采访转录。结果:对7名神经科医师、2名MS专科执业护士和1名MS注册护士进行了访谈。提供者表达了几个促进PROM使用的因素,包括参与患者特定症状,启动患者目标设定,提高就诊效率和患者满意度。然而,供应商也表达了障碍,如临床工作流程中断和技术障碍,对结果有效性的怀疑,以及从prom获得的信息的道德/伦理义务。未来的机会是引入预诊prom和将prom直接集成到电子健康记录中。讨论:从MS提供商的角度来看,prom提供了有用的信息,但障碍仍然存在。PROMs有望成为护理PwMS的辅助工具,以优化其作为卫生保健系统用户的功能和体验,这些结果可能为MS诊所未来常规PROMs的战略实施提供信息。试验注册信息:该试验于2021年7月28日在美国国立卫生研究院美国国家医学图书馆ClinicalTrials.gov注册。临床试验编号:NCT04979546。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信