Promoting Sleep for Neurology Inpatients: The Value of Routine Overnight Vital Signs.

IF 3.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200492
Colin A Ellis, Patrick Z Liu, Alan Napole, Lydia Denison, Noor F Shaik, Grace Anya Venezia, Lovisa Ljungberg, Michael A Karamardian, Colleen Peachey, Michael Buckley, Charles J Bae, Laura Stein, Denise J Xu
{"title":"Promoting Sleep for Neurology Inpatients: The Value of Routine Overnight Vital Signs.","authors":"Colin A Ellis, Patrick Z Liu, Alan Napole, Lydia Denison, Noor F Shaik, Grace Anya Venezia, Lovisa Ljungberg, Michael A Karamardian, Colleen Peachey, Michael Buckley, Charles J Bae, Laura Stein, Denise J Xu","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sleep is a critical component of health and recovery. Awakening sleeping patients for routine vital sign monitoring overnight is a common inpatient practice, but its benefits are uncertain. This study asked 3 questions: (1) How often are routine overnight vital signs abnormal? (2) How often are those abnormal vital signs clinically actionable? (3) Are there patients who may not need routine overnight vital sign monitoring?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed observational retrospective data extracted from electronic health records of patients admitted to inpatient neurology floors at our institution between 2017 and 2024. We defined routine vital signs as collected by nursing assistants at least 3 hours apart. The outcome measure was an urgent clinical action (stat orders, rapid responses, or transfers to a higher level of care) within 1 hour of vital sign events. We compared the rate of urgent clinical actions after abnormal vital signs with the base rate of those events after normal vital signs. Statistical analysis used generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 102,184 routine vital sign events from 5,569 neurology admissions. In total, 9% of vital sign events were abnormal. The likelihood of urgent clinical actions increased after abnormal vital sign events, compared with after normal vital sign events during the day (4.3% vs 2.4%, odds ratio (OR) 1.8 [1.6-2.1]); at night (2.4% vs 0.9%, OR 2.8 [2.2-3.7]); during the night in low-risk patients with normal daytime vitals (2.0% vs 0.7%, OR 3.0 [1.8-4.9]); and at night in high-risk patients with abnormal daytime vitals (2.6% vs 1.1%, OR 2.5 [1.7-3.6]). The number needed to treat (NNT), i.e., the number of vital sign events needed to initiate 1 extra urgent clinical action above the base rate, was 1,856 [943; 4,598] in low-risk patients. The NNT for low-risk stroke patients was 1,570 [679; 4,707] and for general neurology patients was 2,231 [797; 5,423].</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Urgent clinical actions attributable to abnormal routine vital signs were uncommon in neurology inpatients, especially overnight in patients with normal daytime vital signs. Determining the risks and benefits of routine overnight vital sign monitoring will help hospitals and health care providers move toward more patient-centered inpatient neurologic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 4","pages":"e200492"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12253964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Sleep is a critical component of health and recovery. Awakening sleeping patients for routine vital sign monitoring overnight is a common inpatient practice, but its benefits are uncertain. This study asked 3 questions: (1) How often are routine overnight vital signs abnormal? (2) How often are those abnormal vital signs clinically actionable? (3) Are there patients who may not need routine overnight vital sign monitoring?

Methods: We analyzed observational retrospective data extracted from electronic health records of patients admitted to inpatient neurology floors at our institution between 2017 and 2024. We defined routine vital signs as collected by nursing assistants at least 3 hours apart. The outcome measure was an urgent clinical action (stat orders, rapid responses, or transfers to a higher level of care) within 1 hour of vital sign events. We compared the rate of urgent clinical actions after abnormal vital signs with the base rate of those events after normal vital signs. Statistical analysis used generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measures.

Results: We analyzed 102,184 routine vital sign events from 5,569 neurology admissions. In total, 9% of vital sign events were abnormal. The likelihood of urgent clinical actions increased after abnormal vital sign events, compared with after normal vital sign events during the day (4.3% vs 2.4%, odds ratio (OR) 1.8 [1.6-2.1]); at night (2.4% vs 0.9%, OR 2.8 [2.2-3.7]); during the night in low-risk patients with normal daytime vitals (2.0% vs 0.7%, OR 3.0 [1.8-4.9]); and at night in high-risk patients with abnormal daytime vitals (2.6% vs 1.1%, OR 2.5 [1.7-3.6]). The number needed to treat (NNT), i.e., the number of vital sign events needed to initiate 1 extra urgent clinical action above the base rate, was 1,856 [943; 4,598] in low-risk patients. The NNT for low-risk stroke patients was 1,570 [679; 4,707] and for general neurology patients was 2,231 [797; 5,423].

Discussion: Urgent clinical actions attributable to abnormal routine vital signs were uncommon in neurology inpatients, especially overnight in patients with normal daytime vital signs. Determining the risks and benefits of routine overnight vital sign monitoring will help hospitals and health care providers move toward more patient-centered inpatient neurologic care.

促进神经内科住院患者睡眠:常规夜间生命体征的价值。
背景和目的:睡眠是健康和恢复的重要组成部分。唤醒睡眠中的病人进行夜间常规生命体征监测是一种常见的住院做法,但其益处尚不确定。该研究提出了3个问题:(1)常规夜间生命体征异常的频率?(2)生命体征异常的临床可诉频率?(3)是否存在不需要夜间常规生命体征监测的患者?方法:我们分析了从2017年至2024年我院住院神经内科楼层患者的电子健康记录中提取的观察性回顾性数据。我们将常规生命体征定义为由护理助理至少间隔3小时采集。结果测量是生命体征事件发生1小时内的紧急临床行动(开始命令,快速反应或转移到更高级别的护理)。我们比较了生命体征异常后的紧急临床行动率和生命体征正常后的紧急临床行动率。统计分析使用广义估计方程来解释重复测量。结果:我们分析了来自5,569例神经内科住院患者的102,184例常规生命体征事件。总共有9%的生命体征事件异常。与白天正常生命体征事件发生后相比,异常生命体征事件发生后紧急临床行动的可能性增加(4.3% vs 2.4%,优势比(OR) 1.8 [1.6-2.1]);夜间(2.4% vs 0.9%, OR 2.8 [2.2-3.7]);白天生命体征正常的低危患者在夜间(2.0% vs 0.7%, OR 3.0 [1.8-4.9]);白天生命体征异常的高危患者在夜间(2.6% vs 1.1%, OR为2.5[1.7-3.6])。需要治疗的数量(NNT),即需要启动1次高于基本率的额外紧急临床行动的生命体征事件的数量为1856例[943例;4,598]低危患者。低风险脑卒中患者的NNT为1570 [679;4707例],普通神经病学患者为2231例[797例;5423]。讨论:神经内科住院患者因常规生命体征异常而采取紧急临床行动的情况并不多见,特别是在白天生命体征正常的患者中。确定常规夜间生命体征监测的风险和益处将有助于医院和卫生保健提供者转向更多以患者为中心的住院神经系统护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信