Three-Week Video- and Home-Based Training Program for People with Ataxia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clara Rentz, Alisha Reinhardt, Naomi Jung, Vignesh Vanchinathan, Jutta Peterburs, Heike Jacobi, Dagmar Timmann, Andreas Thieme, Doris Brötz, Christian Bellebaum, Alfons Schnitzler, Katrin Amunts, Martina Minnerop
{"title":"Three-Week Video- and Home-Based Training Program for People with Ataxia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Clara Rentz, Alisha Reinhardt, Naomi Jung, Vignesh Vanchinathan, Jutta Peterburs, Heike Jacobi, Dagmar Timmann, Andreas Thieme, Doris Brötz, Christian Bellebaum, Alfons Schnitzler, Katrin Amunts, Martina Minnerop","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.70225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gait and balance impairment is a disabling clinical feature in people with degenerative cerebellar ataxia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We performed a rater-blinded, parallel 3-arm randomized controlled trial with delayed-start-design (exploratory proof-of-concept study) to assess whether, compared to control, people with mild/moderate hereditary ataxia benefit from additional video-based training with different frequencies, and how clinical characteristics interact with training success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Digital gait/balance measures were assessed before and after a three-week video-based training program at home (Train20: 4 × 20min/week, n = 11; Train40: 2 × 40min/week, n = 11; control: standard medical care, n = 10). Group differences at baseline and changes over time were assessed using ANOVA. Linear mixed models were conducted to examine the influence of clinical variables on outcomes over time. Further exploratory analyses were performed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and paired t-tests within each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All variables showed good to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC ≥0.69). No significant interactions between group and measurement time were found for clinical or gait/balance variables (p ≥ 0.338). However, participants with higher initial disease severity, greater impairment in activities of daily living, and better well-being showed significant improvements in feet-together stance (p = 0.04), normal (p = 0.01), and backward gait (p = 0.03). Exploratory analyses showed improvement only in Train40.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the protocol did not lead to general improvements in people with mild/moderate ataxia, irrespective of training frequency, those with higher initial disease severity, higher functional impairment, and better mental well-being showed significant benefits. Greater attention should be given to the impact of well-being to enhance motor training outcomes. Longer, less frequent sessions may offer greater potential for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gait and balance impairment is a disabling clinical feature in people with degenerative cerebellar ataxia.

Objectives: We performed a rater-blinded, parallel 3-arm randomized controlled trial with delayed-start-design (exploratory proof-of-concept study) to assess whether, compared to control, people with mild/moderate hereditary ataxia benefit from additional video-based training with different frequencies, and how clinical characteristics interact with training success.

Methods: Digital gait/balance measures were assessed before and after a three-week video-based training program at home (Train20: 4 × 20min/week, n = 11; Train40: 2 × 40min/week, n = 11; control: standard medical care, n = 10). Group differences at baseline and changes over time were assessed using ANOVA. Linear mixed models were conducted to examine the influence of clinical variables on outcomes over time. Further exploratory analyses were performed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and paired t-tests within each group.

Results: All variables showed good to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC ≥0.69). No significant interactions between group and measurement time were found for clinical or gait/balance variables (p ≥ 0.338). However, participants with higher initial disease severity, greater impairment in activities of daily living, and better well-being showed significant improvements in feet-together stance (p = 0.04), normal (p = 0.01), and backward gait (p = 0.03). Exploratory analyses showed improvement only in Train40.

Conclusions: Although the protocol did not lead to general improvements in people with mild/moderate ataxia, irrespective of training frequency, those with higher initial disease severity, higher functional impairment, and better mental well-being showed significant benefits. Greater attention should be given to the impact of well-being to enhance motor training outcomes. Longer, less frequent sessions may offer greater potential for improvement.

针对共济失调患者的三周视频和家庭培训计划:一项随机对照试验。
背景:步态和平衡障碍是退行性小脑共济失调患者的一种致残性临床特征。目的:我们进行了一项非盲法、平行三组随机对照试验,采用延迟启动设计(探索性概念验证研究),以评估与对照组相比,轻度/中度遗传性共济失调患者是否从不同频率的额外视频训练中获益,以及临床特征如何与训练成功相互作用。方法:在为期三周的家庭视频训练计划(Train20: 4 × 20分钟/周,n = 11;Train40: 2 × 40min/周,n = 11;对照组:标准医疗护理,n = 10)。采用方差分析评估各组基线差异和随时间变化。采用线性混合模型来检验临床变量对结果的影响。进一步使用类内相关系数(ICC)进行探索性分析,并在每组内进行配对t检验。结果:所有变量的重测信度均为良至优(ICC≥0.69)。临床或步态/平衡变量与测量时间之间无显著交互作用(p≥0.338)。然而,初始疾病严重程度较高、日常生活活动受损较大、健康状况较好的参与者在双脚合十站立(p = 0.04)、正常步态(p = 0.01)和后退步态(p = 0.03)方面均有显著改善。探索性分析显示,只有Train40有所改善。结论:尽管该方案没有导致轻度/中度共济失调患者的普遍改善,无论训练频率如何,但那些初始疾病严重程度较高、功能损害较高和精神健康状况较好的患者显示出显着的益处。应该更多地关注幸福感的影响,以提高运动训练的效果。更长的、更少的会话可能提供更大的改进潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信