{"title":"Perioperative Changes in Oral Function and Association With Oral Food Intake Status in Patients Undergoing Gastric and Oesophageal Cancer Surgery","authors":"Misaki Tanaka, Koichiro Matsuo, Rena Hidaka, Tomoka Maruyama, Yu Sekimoto, Risako Mikami","doi":"10.1111/joor.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Perioperative oral health care traditionally focuses on oral hygiene to prevent post-surgical infection, with limited attention to oral function. This study explores perioperative changes in oral function in association with oral food intake in patients receiving gastric or oesophageal cancer surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent surgery for gastric or oesophageal cancer at a university hospital and visited its outpatient dental centre for perioperative oral health care were recruited from August 2018 to March 2021. Several oral function parameters (lip-tongue motor function, tongue pressure, occlusal force, oral dryness and dysphagia score) were measured 1 day before and 7 days after treatment. The patients were categorised into the oral intake (PO) and non-oral intake (NPO) groups based on oral food intake status at 7 days post-surgery, and perioperative changes in oral function were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test between the PO and NPO groups for both gastric and oesophageal cancers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 298 gastric cancer patients and 71 oesophageal cancer patients analysed, 87% and 24% of patients, respectively, were capable of oral food intake at 7 days after surgery. In gastric cancer patients, oral hygiene, tongue pressure and dysphagia scores significantly worsened in the PO group. In contrast, oral hygiene, tongue pressure and dysphagia scores were all significantly worsened in the oesophageal cancer NPO group, but not in the PO group. Oral dryness and occlusal force did not change remarkably regardless of oral food intake status in these patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study uncovered a significant decrease in oral function in oesophageal cancer patients without postoperative oral food intake, suggesting a potential association between impaired oral motor function and delayed oral intake recovery. Accordingly, perioperative oral function management alongside oral hygiene care is advisable for early resumption of oral food intake.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":"52 11","pages":"2066-2073"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joor.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Perioperative oral health care traditionally focuses on oral hygiene to prevent post-surgical infection, with limited attention to oral function. This study explores perioperative changes in oral function in association with oral food intake in patients receiving gastric or oesophageal cancer surgery.
Methods
Patients who underwent surgery for gastric or oesophageal cancer at a university hospital and visited its outpatient dental centre for perioperative oral health care were recruited from August 2018 to March 2021. Several oral function parameters (lip-tongue motor function, tongue pressure, occlusal force, oral dryness and dysphagia score) were measured 1 day before and 7 days after treatment. The patients were categorised into the oral intake (PO) and non-oral intake (NPO) groups based on oral food intake status at 7 days post-surgery, and perioperative changes in oral function were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test between the PO and NPO groups for both gastric and oesophageal cancers.
Results
Of the 298 gastric cancer patients and 71 oesophageal cancer patients analysed, 87% and 24% of patients, respectively, were capable of oral food intake at 7 days after surgery. In gastric cancer patients, oral hygiene, tongue pressure and dysphagia scores significantly worsened in the PO group. In contrast, oral hygiene, tongue pressure and dysphagia scores were all significantly worsened in the oesophageal cancer NPO group, but not in the PO group. Oral dryness and occlusal force did not change remarkably regardless of oral food intake status in these patients.
Conclusions
This study uncovered a significant decrease in oral function in oesophageal cancer patients without postoperative oral food intake, suggesting a potential association between impaired oral motor function and delayed oral intake recovery. Accordingly, perioperative oral function management alongside oral hygiene care is advisable for early resumption of oral food intake.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.