Workplace bullying, discrimination, harassment and quality of life among pediatric physiatrists.

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Amy Houtrow, David Pruitt, Kristyn Felman, Matthew Mesoros
{"title":"Workplace bullying, discrimination, harassment and quality of life among pediatric physiatrists.","authors":"Amy Houtrow, David Pruitt, Kristyn Felman, Matthew Mesoros","doi":"10.1177/18758894251353066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThe purpose of this study was to quantify quality of life (QOL), workplace bullying, discrimination and harassment among pediatric physiatrists.MethodsPediatric physiatrists (N = 389) were invited to participate in an online survey. Demographic data were collected as were the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), the Negative Acts Questionnaire Revised (NAQ-22), and an adapted version of the Chronic Work Discrimination and Harassment Scale (aCWDHS). Means and standard deviations, one-sided t-tests, chi-squared and ANOVA tests were calculated with the p-value set a priori at 0.05.ResultsThe average WHOQOL-BREF score was 76.49/100. Seventeen percent of pediatric physiatrists met the threshold score of 33 for being bullied at least occasionally. The average score on the aCWDHS was 49.31. Disabled pediatric physiatrists reported statistically lower QOL scores (t = 2.356, p = .010), more workplace discrimination and harassment (t = 2.502, p = .010), and more workplace bullying (t = 2.139, p = .022). Low QOL scores were correlated with the scores on the aCWDHS and NAQ-22.ConclusionAddressing workplace bullying, discrimination, and harassment could potentially improve the QOL of pediatric physiatrists, especially those with disabilities who report a disproportionate amount of mistreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"18758894251353066"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18758894251353066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to quantify quality of life (QOL), workplace bullying, discrimination and harassment among pediatric physiatrists.MethodsPediatric physiatrists (N = 389) were invited to participate in an online survey. Demographic data were collected as were the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), the Negative Acts Questionnaire Revised (NAQ-22), and an adapted version of the Chronic Work Discrimination and Harassment Scale (aCWDHS). Means and standard deviations, one-sided t-tests, chi-squared and ANOVA tests were calculated with the p-value set a priori at 0.05.ResultsThe average WHOQOL-BREF score was 76.49/100. Seventeen percent of pediatric physiatrists met the threshold score of 33 for being bullied at least occasionally. The average score on the aCWDHS was 49.31. Disabled pediatric physiatrists reported statistically lower QOL scores (t = 2.356, p = .010), more workplace discrimination and harassment (t = 2.502, p = .010), and more workplace bullying (t = 2.139, p = .022). Low QOL scores were correlated with the scores on the aCWDHS and NAQ-22.ConclusionAddressing workplace bullying, discrimination, and harassment could potentially improve the QOL of pediatric physiatrists, especially those with disabilities who report a disproportionate amount of mistreatment.

工作场所欺凌、歧视、骚扰和儿科物理医生的生活质量。
目的本研究旨在量化儿科物理医师的生活质量(QOL)、工作场所欺凌、歧视和骚扰。方法邀请389名儿科医师参与在线调查。收集了人口统计数据,包括世界卫生组织生活质量评估(WHOQOL-BREF)、负面行为问卷修订(NAQ-22)和长期工作歧视和骚扰量表(aCWDHS)的改编版本。计算均数和标准差、单侧t检验、卡方检验和方差分析检验,p值先验设置为0.05。结果WHOQOL-BREF平均评分为76.49/100。17%的儿科物理医生至少偶尔会被欺负,达到了33分的阈值。aCWDHS的平均得分为49.31分。残疾儿科物理医生报告的生活质量得分较低(t = 2.356, p = 0.010),工作场所歧视和骚扰较多(t = 2.502, p = 0.010),工作场所欺凌较多(t = 2.139, p = 0.022)。低生活质量得分与aCWDHS和NAQ-22得分相关。结论:解决职场欺凌、歧视和骚扰问题可能会改善儿科物理医生的生活质量,尤其是那些报告遭受不成比例虐待的残疾儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
139
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信