Swimming-based training ameliorates cardiac dysfunction and oxidative stress in chronically stressed rats.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000004047
Carlos H O Reis, Leonardo Dos Santos, Elis A Morra, Divanei A Zaniqueli, Ana Paula Lima-Leopoldo, Julien S Baker, Andre S Leopoldo, Danilo S Bocalini
{"title":"Swimming-based training ameliorates cardiac dysfunction and oxidative stress in chronically stressed rats.","authors":"Carlos H O Reis, Leonardo Dos Santos, Elis A Morra, Divanei A Zaniqueli, Ana Paula Lima-Leopoldo, Julien S Baker, Andre S Leopoldo, Danilo S Bocalini","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of swimming training on cardiac structure and function, and oxidative stress induced by the rat model of chronic restraint stress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Young Wistar-UFES rats (n:40) were distributed in four groups: Control, Trained, Stressed, and Stressed and Trained. The training program consisted of 60 min per day, five times a week for 12 weeks, without additional load. The restraint stress was applied using an opaque PVC cylinder for 1 h per day, 5 days a week, for 12 weeks. Physical capacity, blood pressure, ventricular performance via echocardiogram, histological evaluations, and oxidative stress were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 12 weeks, only the trained groups improved physical capacity. Corticosterone levels (nmol/l) were higher than in the Trained group (174 ± 9) compared to Control (141 ± 8). Swimming training does not prevent the increase (Stressed and trained: 231 ± 17) but mitigate the effect of restraint stress on the corticosterone circulation (Stressed: 335 ± 24). SBP (mmHg) was similar in Trained (138 ± 14) and Control (135 ± 22). Chronic stress significantly increased SBP (180 ± 13), while swimming training prevented partially this increase (Stressed and Trained: 164 ± 16). Regarding ventricular performance, the A wave (mm/s) was lower in the Stressed group (268 ± 36) compared to Control (342 ± 63), Trained (355 ± 74), and Stressed and Trained (360 ± 80), and the E/A ratio was higher in the Stressed group (2.96 ± 0.70) compared to Control (1.66 ± 0.28), Trained (1.55 ± 0.30), and Stressed and Trained (1.75 ± 0.33). The values of DT, +dT/dtmax, and -dT/dtmax Trained group was high than Control, Stressed, and Stressed and Trained groups. For nuclear volume (μm3), no differences were observed between the Control (144 ± 7) and Trained (146 ± 7) groups, and both were smaller than the Stressed (175 ± 10) and Stressed and Trained (161 ± 2) groups, which differed from each other. Malondialdehyde (MDA, in μmol/l/mg) increased in the Stressed group (0.74 ± 0.07) beyond control levels (Control: 0.49 ± 0.09). This increase in MDA levels was prevented by swimming training (Stressed and trained: 0.43 ± 0.12). Oxidized proteins (μmol/l) also increased with restraint stress (Stressed: 1.4 ± 0.4 vs. Control: 0.76 ± 0.10, and Trained: 0.72 ± 0.04), but this increase was prevented by swimming training (Stressed and Trained: 0.69 ± 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Restraint stress caused a significant increase in SBP, impairments in diastolic function, increase in nuclear volume, and oxidative stress. Swimming training in turn prevented these stress-evoked effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":"43 8","pages":"1381-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of swimming training on cardiac structure and function, and oxidative stress induced by the rat model of chronic restraint stress.

Methods: Young Wistar-UFES rats (n:40) were distributed in four groups: Control, Trained, Stressed, and Stressed and Trained. The training program consisted of 60 min per day, five times a week for 12 weeks, without additional load. The restraint stress was applied using an opaque PVC cylinder for 1 h per day, 5 days a week, for 12 weeks. Physical capacity, blood pressure, ventricular performance via echocardiogram, histological evaluations, and oxidative stress were assessed.

Results: After 12 weeks, only the trained groups improved physical capacity. Corticosterone levels (nmol/l) were higher than in the Trained group (174 ± 9) compared to Control (141 ± 8). Swimming training does not prevent the increase (Stressed and trained: 231 ± 17) but mitigate the effect of restraint stress on the corticosterone circulation (Stressed: 335 ± 24). SBP (mmHg) was similar in Trained (138 ± 14) and Control (135 ± 22). Chronic stress significantly increased SBP (180 ± 13), while swimming training prevented partially this increase (Stressed and Trained: 164 ± 16). Regarding ventricular performance, the A wave (mm/s) was lower in the Stressed group (268 ± 36) compared to Control (342 ± 63), Trained (355 ± 74), and Stressed and Trained (360 ± 80), and the E/A ratio was higher in the Stressed group (2.96 ± 0.70) compared to Control (1.66 ± 0.28), Trained (1.55 ± 0.30), and Stressed and Trained (1.75 ± 0.33). The values of DT, +dT/dtmax, and -dT/dtmax Trained group was high than Control, Stressed, and Stressed and Trained groups. For nuclear volume (μm3), no differences were observed between the Control (144 ± 7) and Trained (146 ± 7) groups, and both were smaller than the Stressed (175 ± 10) and Stressed and Trained (161 ± 2) groups, which differed from each other. Malondialdehyde (MDA, in μmol/l/mg) increased in the Stressed group (0.74 ± 0.07) beyond control levels (Control: 0.49 ± 0.09). This increase in MDA levels was prevented by swimming training (Stressed and trained: 0.43 ± 0.12). Oxidized proteins (μmol/l) also increased with restraint stress (Stressed: 1.4 ± 0.4 vs. Control: 0.76 ± 0.10, and Trained: 0.72 ± 0.04), but this increase was prevented by swimming training (Stressed and Trained: 0.69 ± 0.11).

Conclusion: Restraint stress caused a significant increase in SBP, impairments in diastolic function, increase in nuclear volume, and oxidative stress. Swimming training in turn prevented these stress-evoked effects.

以游泳为基础的训练可改善慢性应激大鼠的心功能障碍和氧化应激。
目的:研究游泳训练对慢性限制性应激大鼠心肌结构、功能及氧化应激的影响。方法:wistar - ues幼年大鼠40只,随机分为对照组、训练组、应激组、应激+训练组。训练计划包括每天60分钟,每周五次,持续12周,没有额外的负荷。采用不透明PVC圆柱体施加约束应力,每天1小时,每周5天,共12周。通过超声心动图评估身体能力、血压、心室表现、组织学评估和氧化应激。结果:12周后,只有训练组的体能有所提高。实验组皮质酮水平(nmol/l)(174±9)高于对照组(141±8)。游泳训练不能阻止皮质酮循环的增加(应激和训练:231±17),但可以减轻约束应激对皮质酮循环的影响(应激:335±24)。实验组(138±14)和对照组(135±22)收缩压(mmHg)相似。慢性应激显著增加收缩压(180±13),而游泳训练部分阻止了这种增加(应激和训练:164±16)。在心室功能方面,应激组A波(mm/s)(268±36)低于对照组(342±63)、训练组(355±74)和应激+训练组(360±80),E/A比(2.96±0.70)高于对照组(1.66±0.28)、训练组(1.55±0.30)和应激+训练组(1.75±0.33)。训练组DT、+ DT /dtmax和-dT/dtmax值高于对照组、应激组和应激+训练组。核体积(μm3),对照组(144±7)和训练组(146±7)之间无差异,均小于应激组(175±10)和应激+训练组(161±2),两者之间存在差异。应激组丙二醛(MDA, μmol/l/mg)高于对照组(0.49±0.09)(0.74±0.07)。游泳训练可防止MDA水平升高(应激和训练:0.43±0.12)。氧化蛋白(μmol/l)也随抑制应激(应激:1.4±0.4 vs.对照组:0.76±0.10,训练:0.72±0.04)而增加,但这种增加被游泳训练(应激和训练:0.69±0.11)所阻止。结论:约束应激可引起收缩压升高、舒张功能损害、核体积增大和氧化应激。游泳训练反过来阻止了这些压力引起的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信