{"title":"Validation of a Fall Predictive Model for Inpatients in Japanese Long Term Care Hospitals.","authors":"Hitomi Shimada, Risa Hirata, Naoko E Katsuki, Eiji Nakatani, Kiyoshi Shikino, Maiko Ono, Midori Tokushima, Tomoyo Nishi, Shizuka Yaita, Chihiro Saito, Kaori Amari, Kazuya Kurogi, Yoshimasa Oda, Mariko Yoshimura, Shun Yamashita, Yoshinori Tokushima, Hidetoshi Aihara, Motoshi Fujiwara, Masaki Tago","doi":"10.7150/ijms.106600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The Saga Falls Risk Model 2 (SFRM2) is a simplified fall prediction model that we recently developed. It uses eight items that are easy to assess at the time of admission to an acute care hospital. However, patients in long-term care hospitals have poor activities of daily living and a high risk of falls compared to those in acute care hospitals. Although effective fall predictive models exist for long-term care hospitals, their accuracy remains suboptimal. This study aimed to validate the SFRM2 for predicting falls in long-term care hospital patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted in three long-term care hospitals in Japan from April 2018 to March 2021. All inpatients aged ≥20 years were included. The eight items of the SFRM2 (age, sex, emergency admission, department of admission, hypnotic medication use, history of falls, eating independence, and Bedriddenness rank) and in-hospital falls were collected from medical records. The accuracy of SFRM2 was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and shrinkage coefficient, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 1182 patients (median age: 86 years, 538 males) included in the analysis, 140 (11.8%) experienced in-hospital falls. The fall incidence rate was 4.4 per 1000 patient-days. SFRM2 exhibited an AUC of 0.889 (95% confidence interval: 0.861-0.916), consistent with the actual incidence of falls, with a shrinkage coefficient of 0.975. The cutoff score for SFRM2 on the Youden index was -2.14, with a sensitivity of 77.9%, specificity of 84.7%, positive predictive value of 40.6%, and negative predictive value of 96.6%. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> SFRM2 showed good discriminative ability in external validation at long-term care hospitals. Its applicability in this setting may be advantageous due to the relatively stable condition of older inpatients compared to those in acute care hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 12","pages":"2877-2883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.106600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Saga Falls Risk Model 2 (SFRM2) is a simplified fall prediction model that we recently developed. It uses eight items that are easy to assess at the time of admission to an acute care hospital. However, patients in long-term care hospitals have poor activities of daily living and a high risk of falls compared to those in acute care hospitals. Although effective fall predictive models exist for long-term care hospitals, their accuracy remains suboptimal. This study aimed to validate the SFRM2 for predicting falls in long-term care hospital patients. Methods: This multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted in three long-term care hospitals in Japan from April 2018 to March 2021. All inpatients aged ≥20 years were included. The eight items of the SFRM2 (age, sex, emergency admission, department of admission, hypnotic medication use, history of falls, eating independence, and Bedriddenness rank) and in-hospital falls were collected from medical records. The accuracy of SFRM2 was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and shrinkage coefficient, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Results: Among the 1182 patients (median age: 86 years, 538 males) included in the analysis, 140 (11.8%) experienced in-hospital falls. The fall incidence rate was 4.4 per 1000 patient-days. SFRM2 exhibited an AUC of 0.889 (95% confidence interval: 0.861-0.916), consistent with the actual incidence of falls, with a shrinkage coefficient of 0.975. The cutoff score for SFRM2 on the Youden index was -2.14, with a sensitivity of 77.9%, specificity of 84.7%, positive predictive value of 40.6%, and negative predictive value of 96.6%. Conclusion: SFRM2 showed good discriminative ability in external validation at long-term care hospitals. Its applicability in this setting may be advantageous due to the relatively stable condition of older inpatients compared to those in acute care hospitals.
背景:Saga跌倒风险模型2 (SFRM2)是我们最近开发的一个简化的跌倒预测模型。它使用了8个项目,这些项目在急诊医院入院时很容易评估。然而,与急症护理医院的患者相比,长期护理医院的患者日常生活活动能力差,跌倒风险高。虽然长期护理医院存在有效的跌倒预测模型,但其准确性仍然不理想。本研究旨在验证SFRM2对长期护理医院患者跌倒的预测作用。方法:本多中心回顾性观察研究于2018年4月至2021年3月在日本三家长期护理医院进行。所有住院患者年龄≥20岁。SFRM2的8项指标(年龄、性别、急诊入院情况、住院科室、催眠药物使用情况、跌倒史、饮食独立性、卧床等级)和院内跌倒。通过计算曲线下面积(area under The curve, AUC)和收缩系数,以及敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值来评估SFRM2的准确性。结果:在纳入分析的1182例患者(中位年龄:86岁,538例男性)中,140例(11.8%)发生过院内跌倒。跌倒发生率为每1000患者日4.4例。SFRM2的AUC为0.889(95%可信区间:0.861-0.916),与实际跌倒发生率一致,收缩系数为0.975。SFRM2在约登指数上的临界值为-2.14,敏感性77.9%,特异性84.7%,阳性预测值40.6%,阴性预测值96.6%。结论:SFRM2在长期护理医院的外部验证中具有良好的判别能力。它的适用性在这种情况下可能是有利的,因为老年住院病人的病情相对稳定相比,那些在急症护理医院。
期刊介绍:
Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.