Comparison of Shaping Ability and Apical Debris Extrusion Using 4 Different Nickel-Titanium Single-File Systems.

IF 3 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
International Journal of Biomaterials Pub Date : 2025-07-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijbm/2161833
Siyu Li, Mengzhen Tang, Xi Wang, Jian Yang
{"title":"Comparison of Shaping Ability and Apical Debris Extrusion Using 4 Different Nickel-Titanium Single-File Systems.","authors":"Siyu Li, Mengzhen Tang, Xi Wang, Jian Yang","doi":"10.1155/ijbm/2161833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study compared the shaping ability and apical debris extrusion of four nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) single-file systems in simulated curved root canals. <b>Methods:</b> Forty simulated curved root canals in resin blocks were randomly assigned to four groups (<i>n</i> = 10): Reciproc Blue (RCB), V-Blue, One Plex, and S-ONE. Images of the simulated root canals were captured before and after instrumentation. The two layers were processed and superimposed using specialized software. Eleven points (Levels 0-10) were selected at 1-mm intervals starting from the apex for evaluation. The amount of resin removed from both the inner (X1) and outer sides (X2) of the root canal, as well as the final canal width (Y), were measured. The centering ratio was calculated using the formula (X1 - X2)/Y to assess the centering ability of the instruments. Apically extruded debris was collected during the root preparation. <b>Results:</b> The preparation times for the root canal were as follows: One Plex > RCB > V-Blue > S-ONE (<i>p</i> < 0.001). All four Ni-Ti files were effective in straightening the root canal, with no significant difference in curvature change (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At the apex, One Plex exhibited significantly greater deviation compared with the other three groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At Levels 7-8, the deviation with RCB was significantly greater than with One Plex and S-ONE (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The amount of apical debris extrusion in the One Plex group was significantly higher than that in the others (<i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> S-ONE demonstrated the best centering ability compared with other groups. In contrast, One Plex produced the highest amount of apical debris extrusion and exhibited transportation at the apical foramen. At Levels 6-8, RCB exhibited excessive removal of the inner canal wall relative to S-ONE and One Plex.</p>","PeriodicalId":13704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomaterials","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2161833"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12253992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijbm/2161833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study compared the shaping ability and apical debris extrusion of four nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) single-file systems in simulated curved root canals. Methods: Forty simulated curved root canals in resin blocks were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10): Reciproc Blue (RCB), V-Blue, One Plex, and S-ONE. Images of the simulated root canals were captured before and after instrumentation. The two layers were processed and superimposed using specialized software. Eleven points (Levels 0-10) were selected at 1-mm intervals starting from the apex for evaluation. The amount of resin removed from both the inner (X1) and outer sides (X2) of the root canal, as well as the final canal width (Y), were measured. The centering ratio was calculated using the formula (X1 - X2)/Y to assess the centering ability of the instruments. Apically extruded debris was collected during the root preparation. Results: The preparation times for the root canal were as follows: One Plex > RCB > V-Blue > S-ONE (p < 0.001). All four Ni-Ti files were effective in straightening the root canal, with no significant difference in curvature change (p > 0.05). At the apex, One Plex exhibited significantly greater deviation compared with the other three groups (p < 0.05). At Levels 7-8, the deviation with RCB was significantly greater than with One Plex and S-ONE (p < 0.01). The amount of apical debris extrusion in the One Plex group was significantly higher than that in the others (p < 0.01). Conclusions: S-ONE demonstrated the best centering ability compared with other groups. In contrast, One Plex produced the highest amount of apical debris extrusion and exhibited transportation at the apical foramen. At Levels 6-8, RCB exhibited excessive removal of the inner canal wall relative to S-ONE and One Plex.

4种不同镍钛单锉系统成形能力及尖屑挤压性能的比较。
背景:本研究比较了四种镍钛(Ni-Ti)单锉系统在模拟弯曲根管中的成形能力和根尖碎片挤压。方法:40例树脂块模拟弯曲根管随机分为4组(n = 10): Reciproc Blue (RCB)、V-Blue、One Plex和S-ONE。在预备前后分别捕捉模拟根管的图像。这两层是用专门的软件处理和叠加的。从顶点开始每隔1毫米选取11个点(0-10级)进行评价。测量根管内侧(X1)和外侧(X2)的树脂去除量以及根管最终宽度(Y)。采用公式(X1 - X2)/Y计算定心比,评价仪器定心能力。在根准备过程中收集根尖挤压的碎片。结果:根管预备时间:One Plex > RCB > V-Blue > S-ONE (p < 0.001)。4种镍钛锉矫直根管均有效,曲率变化差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在顶端,One Plex的偏差显著大于其他3组(p < 0.05)。在7 ~ 8级水平,RCB的偏差显著大于One Plex和S-ONE (p < 0.01)。One Plex组根尖碎片挤压量显著高于其他组(p < 0.01)。结论:S-ONE组的定心能力优于其他组。相比之下,One Plex产生了最多的根尖碎片挤压,并在根尖孔表现出运输。在6-8级,相对于S-ONE和One Plex, RCB表现出过多的内管壁移除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Biomaterials
International Journal of Biomaterials MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
50
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信