Effect of individualized PEEP titrated by EIT on postoperative atelectasis in children undergoing laparoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.112280
Sheng-Hua Wang, Ye Wang, Si-Yuan Li, Lai Jiang, Yan-Fei Mao, Qin Xia, Han Gan
{"title":"Effect of individualized PEEP titrated by EIT on postoperative atelectasis in children undergoing laparoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Sheng-Hua Wang, Ye Wang, Si-Yuan Li, Lai Jiang, Yan-Fei Mao, Qin Xia, Han Gan","doi":"10.7150/ijms.112280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Atelectasis is common during perioperative period in children. Although positive end positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been identified as a lung protective ventilation strategy to alleviate atelectasis, there's still no consensus on the optimal value of PEEP. We hypothesized that individualized PEEP titrated by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) may reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 50 children aged between 2 to 7, undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair, were randomly divided into two groups according to the principle of randomization: a control group (PEEP5) and an experimental group (EIT). In the control group, PEEP was set to a fixed value of 5mmHg during pneumoperitoneum mechanical ventilation. The EIT group received an individualized PEEP determined by a decremental PEEP titration using EIT. Ultrasonic assessment and score of atelectasis were carried out post-intubation, post-surgery, and one hour post-extubation. For this study, a total of 12 lung regions were evaluated by Lung ultrasonography, and significant atelectasis was defined by a consolidation score of at least 2 in any region. The primary outcome was the incidence of atelectasis at post-surgery. <b>Results:</b> The incidence of atelectasis after surgery was 92% in the control groups (n=25) and 64% in the EIT groups (n=25), respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.094 to 4.827; P = 0.037). The incidence of atelectasis after 1h post-extubation was 80% in the control groups (n=20) and 48% in the EIT groups (n=12), respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.149 to 2.215; P = 0.038). Both lung consolidations and B-lines score were significantly higher in control group than in the EIT group after surgery (consolidations: 9 vs. 7, P = 0.027; B-lines: 11 vs. 8, P = 0.002) and 1h post-extubation (consolidations: 7 vs. 4, P = 0.018; B-lines: 7 vs. 5, P = 0.037). Lung compliance using optimal PEEP during mechanical ventilation was 20.0±3.3 ml/cm H<sub>2</sub>O. The desaturation (pulse oximeter value is below 95%) after extubation was observed in 7 in the control group and 1 in the EIT group (P = 0.048). Hemodynamics were stable during titration. <b>Conclusion:</b> EIT-directed individualized PEEP titration can reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative atelectasis in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 12","pages":"3007-3013"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.112280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atelectasis is common during perioperative period in children. Although positive end positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been identified as a lung protective ventilation strategy to alleviate atelectasis, there's still no consensus on the optimal value of PEEP. We hypothesized that individualized PEEP titrated by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) may reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis. Methods: A total of 50 children aged between 2 to 7, undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair, were randomly divided into two groups according to the principle of randomization: a control group (PEEP5) and an experimental group (EIT). In the control group, PEEP was set to a fixed value of 5mmHg during pneumoperitoneum mechanical ventilation. The EIT group received an individualized PEEP determined by a decremental PEEP titration using EIT. Ultrasonic assessment and score of atelectasis were carried out post-intubation, post-surgery, and one hour post-extubation. For this study, a total of 12 lung regions were evaluated by Lung ultrasonography, and significant atelectasis was defined by a consolidation score of at least 2 in any region. The primary outcome was the incidence of atelectasis at post-surgery. Results: The incidence of atelectasis after surgery was 92% in the control groups (n=25) and 64% in the EIT groups (n=25), respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.094 to 4.827; P = 0.037). The incidence of atelectasis after 1h post-extubation was 80% in the control groups (n=20) and 48% in the EIT groups (n=12), respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.149 to 2.215; P = 0.038). Both lung consolidations and B-lines score were significantly higher in control group than in the EIT group after surgery (consolidations: 9 vs. 7, P = 0.027; B-lines: 11 vs. 8, P = 0.002) and 1h post-extubation (consolidations: 7 vs. 4, P = 0.018; B-lines: 7 vs. 5, P = 0.037). Lung compliance using optimal PEEP during mechanical ventilation was 20.0±3.3 ml/cm H2O. The desaturation (pulse oximeter value is below 95%) after extubation was observed in 7 in the control group and 1 in the EIT group (P = 0.048). Hemodynamics were stable during titration. Conclusion: EIT-directed individualized PEEP titration can reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative atelectasis in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

EIT滴定个体化PEEP对儿童腹腔镜术后肺不张的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:小儿围手术期肺不张很常见。虽然正呼气末正压(PEEP)已被确定为缓解肺不张的肺保护性通气策略,但对PEEP的最佳值仍未达成共识。我们假设通过电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)滴定个体化PEEP可以减少术后肺不张的发生率。方法:选取50例2 ~ 7岁腹腔镜疝修补术患儿,按随机化原则随机分为对照组(PEEP5)和实验组(EIT)。对照组在气腹机械通气时将PEEP设定为固定值5mmHg。EIT组接受个体化PEEP,使用EIT进行递减PEEP滴定测定。插管后、手术后和拔管后1小时分别进行超声评估和肺不张评分。本研究共对12个肺区域进行肺超声检查,任一区域的实变评分至少为2分即为明显肺不张。主要观察指标是术后肺不张的发生率。结果:对照组(n=25)术后不张发生率为92%,EIT组(n=25)术后不张发生率为64%(优势比[OR], 0.72;95%置信区间[CI], 0.094 ~ 4.827;P = 0.037)。拔管后1h肺不张的发生率在对照组为80% (n=20),在EIT组为48% (n=12)(优势比[OR], 0.59;95%置信区间[CI], 0.149 ~ 2.215;P = 0.038)。对照组术后肺巩固和b线评分均显著高于EIT组(巩固:9比7,P = 0.027;b线:11对8,P = 0.002)和拔管后1h(巩固:7对4,P = 0.018;b线:7 vs. 5, P = 0.037)。机械通气时肺顺应性为20.0±3.3 ml/cm H2O。对照组拔管后血氧饱和度(脉搏血氧计值低于95%)7例,EIT组1例(P = 0.048)。滴药期间血流动力学稳定。结论:eit定向个体化PEEP滴定可降低儿童腹腔镜手术后肺不张的发生率和严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信