Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Endometrial Cancer: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.112922
Xinrui Yao, Sitong Dong, Xiao Li, Ouxuan Liu, Yuexin Hu, Yuxuan Wang, Xiangcheng Fan, Bei Lin
{"title":"Causal Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Endometrial Cancer: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Xinrui Yao, Sitong Dong, Xiao Li, Ouxuan Liu, Yuexin Hu, Yuxuan Wang, Xiangcheng Fan, Bei Lin","doi":"10.7150/ijms.112922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several relevant reports have shown that changes in the composition of the gut microbiota are related to the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer (EC). However, the causal effect of the gut microbiota on EC remains unknown. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was used to assess the causal effects of the gut microbiota on EC, EC with endometrioid histologies and EC with non-endometrioid histologies. The genetic statistics of the gut microbiota, including 18,340 participants, were acquired from the MiBioGen database. The summary statistics of EC, EC with endometrioid histologies and EC with non-endometrioid histologies were obtained from the publicly available Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) database. Suitable single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables (IVs) (<i>P</i> < 5×10<sup>-8</sup>, r<sup>2</sup> < 0.001). The causal effects were evaluated via the MR-Egger regression method, the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, the weighted median test, the weighted mode test, and the simple mode test. The IVW analysis suggested that <i>Ruminococcusgnavusgroup</i> (OR=0.82, 95%CI=0.78-0.85, <i>P</i>=1.29×10<sup>-17</sup>), <i>Euryarchaeota</i> (OR=0.90, 95%CI=0.87-0.94, <i>P</i>=3.78×10<sup>-6</sup>), and <i>CandidatusSoleaferrea</i> (OR=0.92, 95%CI=0.87-0.98, <i>P</i>=0.01) had protective effects on EC and its subtypes. <i>Gammaproteobacteria</i> (OR=1.29, 95%CI=1.19-1.39, <i>P</i>=2.32×10<sup>-10</sup>) served as a risk factor for EC, and <i>Intestinimonas</i> (OR=1.33, 95%CI=1.10-1.62, <i>P</i>=3.68×10<sup>-3</sup>) had detrimental effects on EC with non-endometrioid histologies. The causal relationship between the gut microbiota and EC was explored through two-sample MR analysis, which is helpful for further understanding the gut microbiota-mediated development mechanism underlying EC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 12","pages":"3142-3153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.112922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several relevant reports have shown that changes in the composition of the gut microbiota are related to the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer (EC). However, the causal effect of the gut microbiota on EC remains unknown. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was used to assess the causal effects of the gut microbiota on EC, EC with endometrioid histologies and EC with non-endometrioid histologies. The genetic statistics of the gut microbiota, including 18,340 participants, were acquired from the MiBioGen database. The summary statistics of EC, EC with endometrioid histologies and EC with non-endometrioid histologies were obtained from the publicly available Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) database. Suitable single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables (IVs) (P < 5×10-8, r2 < 0.001). The causal effects were evaluated via the MR-Egger regression method, the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, the weighted median test, the weighted mode test, and the simple mode test. The IVW analysis suggested that Ruminococcusgnavusgroup (OR=0.82, 95%CI=0.78-0.85, P=1.29×10-17), Euryarchaeota (OR=0.90, 95%CI=0.87-0.94, P=3.78×10-6), and CandidatusSoleaferrea (OR=0.92, 95%CI=0.87-0.98, P=0.01) had protective effects on EC and its subtypes. Gammaproteobacteria (OR=1.29, 95%CI=1.19-1.39, P=2.32×10-10) served as a risk factor for EC, and Intestinimonas (OR=1.33, 95%CI=1.10-1.62, P=3.68×10-3) had detrimental effects on EC with non-endometrioid histologies. The causal relationship between the gut microbiota and EC was explored through two-sample MR analysis, which is helpful for further understanding the gut microbiota-mediated development mechanism underlying EC.

肠道菌群与子宫内膜癌之间的因果关系:一项双样本孟德尔随机研究。
一些相关报道表明,肠道微生物群组成的变化与子宫内膜癌(EC)的发病机制有关。然而,肠道菌群对EC的因果影响尚不清楚。一项双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)研究用于评估肠道微生物群对EC、伴有子宫内膜样组织学的EC和伴有非子宫内膜样组织学的EC的因果影响。从MiBioGen数据库中获得了18,340名参与者的肠道微生物群的遗传统计数据。EC、伴有子宫内膜样组织学的EC和伴有非子宫内膜样组织学的EC的汇总统计数据来自公开的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据库。选择合适的单核苷酸多态性(snp)作为工具变量(IVs) (P < 5×10-8, r2 < 0.001)。通过MR-Egger回归法、反方差加权(IVW)法、加权中位数检验、加权模态检验和简单模态检验对因果效应进行评价。IVW分析表明,Ruminococcusgnavusgroup (OR=0.82, 95%CI=0.78 ~ 0.85, P=1.29×10-17)、Euryarchaeota (OR=0.90, 95%CI=0.87 ~ 0.94, P=3.78×10-6)和CandidatusSoleaferrea (OR=0.92, 95%CI=0.87 ~ 0.98, P=0.01)对EC及其亚型具有保护作用。Gammaproteobacteria (OR=1.29, 95%CI=1.19-1.39, P=2.32×10-10)是EC的危险因素,而intestimonas (OR=1.33, 95%CI=1.10-1.62, P=3.68×10-3)对非子宫内膜样组织学的EC有不利影响。通过双样本MR分析,探讨肠道菌群与EC之间的因果关系,有助于进一步了解肠道菌群介导的EC发生机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信