Investigating ICD-11 adjustment disorder among college students in Taiwan using the Chinese version of the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire.
Hong Wang Fung, Ming Yu Claudia Wong, Grace Wing Ka Ho, Mark Shevlin, Anson Kai Chun Chau, Stanley Kam Ki Lam, Janet Yuen-Ha Wong, Shan-Yan Huang
{"title":"Investigating ICD-11 adjustment disorder among college students in Taiwan using the Chinese version of the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire.","authors":"Hong Wang Fung, Ming Yu Claudia Wong, Grace Wing Ka Ho, Mark Shevlin, Anson Kai Chun Chau, Stanley Kam Ki Lam, Janet Yuen-Ha Wong, Shan-Yan Huang","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2528306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases has redefined adjustment disorder and the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire (IADQ) was developed to assess the symptoms and diagnostic criteria. The present study is the first to investigate ICD-11 adjustment disorder using the IADQ in the East Asian context.<b>Methods:</b> We administered standardized self-report measures, including the Chinese version of the IADQ, to a sample of 766 college students in Taiwan, of whom 265 (34.6%) endorsed at least one psychosocial stressor.<b>Results:</b> The two-factor structure of the IADQ reported in previous studies was replicated. The reliability of the two IADQ subscales were high (α = .935 to .948), and they were highly correlated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and complex PTSD (r<sub>s</sub> = .69 to .79, <i>p</i> < .001), demonstrating concurrent validity. In this sample, 5.4% of participants met the diagnostic criteria for ICD-11 adjustment disorder. When participants with probable depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 15) were excluded as per the ICD-11 exclusion rules, 15 participants (1.96%) had probable ICD-11 adjustment disorder.<b>Conclusions:</b> The findings suggest that ICD-11 adjustment disorder can be reliably and validly assessed using the IADQ in the Chinese context. Future studies can use the IADQ to further research the disorder in diverse clinical and nonclinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2528306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2528306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases has redefined adjustment disorder and the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire (IADQ) was developed to assess the symptoms and diagnostic criteria. The present study is the first to investigate ICD-11 adjustment disorder using the IADQ in the East Asian context.Methods: We administered standardized self-report measures, including the Chinese version of the IADQ, to a sample of 766 college students in Taiwan, of whom 265 (34.6%) endorsed at least one psychosocial stressor.Results: The two-factor structure of the IADQ reported in previous studies was replicated. The reliability of the two IADQ subscales were high (α = .935 to .948), and they were highly correlated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and complex PTSD (rs = .69 to .79, p < .001), demonstrating concurrent validity. In this sample, 5.4% of participants met the diagnostic criteria for ICD-11 adjustment disorder. When participants with probable depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 15) were excluded as per the ICD-11 exclusion rules, 15 participants (1.96%) had probable ICD-11 adjustment disorder.Conclusions: The findings suggest that ICD-11 adjustment disorder can be reliably and validly assessed using the IADQ in the Chinese context. Future studies can use the IADQ to further research the disorder in diverse clinical and nonclinical settings.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.