Investigating ICD-11 adjustment disorder among college students in Taiwan using the Chinese version of the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Hong Wang Fung, Ming Yu Claudia Wong, Grace Wing Ka Ho, Mark Shevlin, Anson Kai Chun Chau, Stanley Kam Ki Lam, Janet Yuen-Ha Wong, Shan-Yan Huang
{"title":"Investigating ICD-11 adjustment disorder among college students in Taiwan using the Chinese version of the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire.","authors":"Hong Wang Fung, Ming Yu Claudia Wong, Grace Wing Ka Ho, Mark Shevlin, Anson Kai Chun Chau, Stanley Kam Ki Lam, Janet Yuen-Ha Wong, Shan-Yan Huang","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2528306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases has redefined adjustment disorder and the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire (IADQ) was developed to assess the symptoms and diagnostic criteria. The present study is the first to investigate ICD-11 adjustment disorder using the IADQ in the East Asian context.<b>Methods:</b> We administered standardized self-report measures, including the Chinese version of the IADQ, to a sample of 766 college students in Taiwan, of whom 265 (34.6%) endorsed at least one psychosocial stressor.<b>Results:</b> The two-factor structure of the IADQ reported in previous studies was replicated. The reliability of the two IADQ subscales were high (α = .935 to .948), and they were highly correlated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and complex PTSD (r<sub>s</sub> = .69 to .79, <i>p</i> < .001), demonstrating concurrent validity. In this sample, 5.4% of participants met the diagnostic criteria for ICD-11 adjustment disorder. When participants with probable depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 15) were excluded as per the ICD-11 exclusion rules, 15 participants (1.96%) had probable ICD-11 adjustment disorder.<b>Conclusions:</b> The findings suggest that ICD-11 adjustment disorder can be reliably and validly assessed using the IADQ in the Chinese context. Future studies can use the IADQ to further research the disorder in diverse clinical and nonclinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2528306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2528306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases has redefined adjustment disorder and the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire (IADQ) was developed to assess the symptoms and diagnostic criteria. The present study is the first to investigate ICD-11 adjustment disorder using the IADQ in the East Asian context.Methods: We administered standardized self-report measures, including the Chinese version of the IADQ, to a sample of 766 college students in Taiwan, of whom 265 (34.6%) endorsed at least one psychosocial stressor.Results: The two-factor structure of the IADQ reported in previous studies was replicated. The reliability of the two IADQ subscales were high (α = .935 to .948), and they were highly correlated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and complex PTSD (rs = .69 to .79, p < .001), demonstrating concurrent validity. In this sample, 5.4% of participants met the diagnostic criteria for ICD-11 adjustment disorder. When participants with probable depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 15) were excluded as per the ICD-11 exclusion rules, 15 participants (1.96%) had probable ICD-11 adjustment disorder.Conclusions: The findings suggest that ICD-11 adjustment disorder can be reliably and validly assessed using the IADQ in the Chinese context. Future studies can use the IADQ to further research the disorder in diverse clinical and nonclinical settings.

使用中文版国际适应障碍问卷调查台湾大学生的ICD-11适应障碍。
背景:第11版《国际疾病分类》重新定义了适应障碍,并制定了国际适应障碍问卷(IADQ)来评估症状和诊断标准。本研究首次在东亚背景下使用IADQ调查ICD-11适应障碍。方法:我们对766名台湾大学生进行了标准化的自我报告测量,包括中文版的IADQ,其中265名(34.6%)承认至少有一种社会心理压力源。结果:以往研究报道的IADQ双因子结构得到了重复。两个IADQ分量表的信度较高(α =。935 ~ 0.948),且与抑郁、焦虑和复杂创伤后应激障碍的症状高度相关(rs =。结论:研究结果表明,在中国背景下,使用IADQ可以可靠、有效地评估ICD-11适应障碍。未来的研究可以利用IADQ在不同的临床和非临床环境中进一步研究这种疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信