Possible association of short-term complications and antimicrobial use in standing equine cheek tooth extractions 2018-2022.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Marlies Schnierer, Omid Nekouei, Lisa Christina Huber, Matthias Jehle, Nora Biermann
{"title":"Possible association of short-term complications and antimicrobial use in standing equine cheek tooth extractions 2018-2022.","authors":"Marlies Schnierer, Omid Nekouei, Lisa Christina Huber, Matthias Jehle, Nora Biermann","doi":"10.1111/evj.14563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite growing concerns about antimicrobial resistance, prophylactic antimicrobials continue to be routinely administered in many procedures, including dental extractions. Further evidence-based research is needed on whether their use influences post-operative complication rates.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify risk factors for short-term complications, associations between complications and antimicrobial use as well as factors leading to antimicrobial use in equine (standing) cheek tooth extractions.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of clinical records.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from records of horses undergoing cheek tooth extractions (2018-2022). Multi-variable logistic regression models examined associations between clinical variables and the occurrence of complications and antimicrobial use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and five cases undergoing 447 dental extractions were included. Of these, 197 cases (64.6%) received antimicrobials. Complications occurred in 56 cases (18.4%); these were considered mild and transient in 39 cases (12.7%) and severe, requiring veterinary treatment, in 18 cases (5.6%). Occurrence of complications demonstrated an association with increased antimicrobial use (OR 2.69; CI 1.20-6.04; p = 0.02), presence of concurrent diseases (OR 4.32, CI 1.89-9.84; p = 0.001), extraction of mandibular teeth compared to maxillary teeth (OR 2.20; CI 1.14-4.23; p = 0.018), warmer seasons (OR 1.97; CI 1.03-3.76; p = 0.04) and the reason for extraction being either dental infection (OR 6.37; CI 2.39-16.97; p < 0.001) or dental fracture (OR 3.90; CI 1.53-9.91; p = 0.004) versus periodontal diseases. Antimicrobials were more frequently used when more than 2 teeth were extracted (OR 5.96; CI 2.26-15.70; p < 0.001), when dental infection was the reason for extraction (OR 3.75; CI 1.76-8.02; p = 0.001) or when the extraction was performed in warmer seasons (OR 1.96; CI 1.17-3.29; p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complication rates were comparable to previous studies and in large numbers of horses antimicrobials were not administered, which did not result in higher complication rates. Antimicrobials might be justified in horses suffering from concurrent diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14563","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite growing concerns about antimicrobial resistance, prophylactic antimicrobials continue to be routinely administered in many procedures, including dental extractions. Further evidence-based research is needed on whether their use influences post-operative complication rates.

Objectives: To identify risk factors for short-term complications, associations between complications and antimicrobial use as well as factors leading to antimicrobial use in equine (standing) cheek tooth extractions.

Study design: Retrospective analysis of clinical records.

Methods: Data were extracted from records of horses undergoing cheek tooth extractions (2018-2022). Multi-variable logistic regression models examined associations between clinical variables and the occurrence of complications and antimicrobial use.

Results: Three hundred and five cases undergoing 447 dental extractions were included. Of these, 197 cases (64.6%) received antimicrobials. Complications occurred in 56 cases (18.4%); these were considered mild and transient in 39 cases (12.7%) and severe, requiring veterinary treatment, in 18 cases (5.6%). Occurrence of complications demonstrated an association with increased antimicrobial use (OR 2.69; CI 1.20-6.04; p = 0.02), presence of concurrent diseases (OR 4.32, CI 1.89-9.84; p = 0.001), extraction of mandibular teeth compared to maxillary teeth (OR 2.20; CI 1.14-4.23; p = 0.018), warmer seasons (OR 1.97; CI 1.03-3.76; p = 0.04) and the reason for extraction being either dental infection (OR 6.37; CI 2.39-16.97; p < 0.001) or dental fracture (OR 3.90; CI 1.53-9.91; p = 0.004) versus periodontal diseases. Antimicrobials were more frequently used when more than 2 teeth were extracted (OR 5.96; CI 2.26-15.70; p < 0.001), when dental infection was the reason for extraction (OR 3.75; CI 1.76-8.02; p = 0.001) or when the extraction was performed in warmer seasons (OR 1.96; CI 1.17-3.29; p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Complication rates were comparable to previous studies and in large numbers of horses antimicrobials were not administered, which did not result in higher complication rates. Antimicrobials might be justified in horses suffering from concurrent diseases.

2018-2022年直立马颊牙拔牙短期并发症与抗菌药物使用的可能关联
背景:尽管对抗菌素耐药性的担忧日益增加,但预防性抗菌素继续在许多程序中常规使用,包括拔牙。它们的使用是否会影响术后并发症发生率,还需要进一步的循证研究。目的:确定短期并发症的危险因素,并发症与抗菌药物使用之间的关系,以及导致马(站立)颊牙拔牙时抗菌药物使用的因素。研究设计:回顾性分析临床记录。方法:数据提取自2018-2022年接受颊齿拔除的马的记录。多变量logistic回归模型检验了临床变量与并发症发生和抗菌药物使用之间的关系。结果:共纳入335例,共拔牙447例。其中,197例(64.6%)接受了抗微生物药物治疗。并发症56例(18.4%);39例(12.7%)被认为是轻微和短暂的,18例(5.6%)被认为是严重的,需要兽医治疗。并发症的发生与抗菌药物使用增加有关(OR 2.69;可信区间1.20 - -6.04;p = 0.02),并发疾病的存在(OR 4.32, CI 1.89-9.84;p = 0.001),与上颌牙相比,下颌骨牙的拔除率(OR 2.20;可信区间1.14 - -4.23;p = 0.018),温暖季节(OR 1.97;可信区间1.03 - -3.76;p = 0.04),拔牙的原因是牙齿感染(OR 6.37;可信区间2.39 - -16.97;结论:并发症发生率与以前的研究相当,并且在大量马中没有施用抗菌剂,这没有导致更高的并发症发生率。抗菌剂对患有并发疾病的马可能是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Equine Veterinary Journal
Equine Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信