Comparison of herbal products with antifungal drugs in cure of oral candidiasis: A systematic review.

Q2 Dentistry
Dental Research Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/drj.drj_415_24
Faezeh Khozeimeh, Negar Ghadiri, Behzad Zolfaghari, Bahareh Tahani
{"title":"Comparison of herbal products with antifungal drugs in cure of oral candidiasis: A systematic review.","authors":"Faezeh Khozeimeh, Negar Ghadiri, Behzad Zolfaghari, Bahareh Tahani","doi":"10.4103/drj.drj_415_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral candidiasis is one of the most common fungal infections affecting the oral mucosa. It is usually managed by taking antifungal medication that might result in side effects such as toxicity and drug resistance. Therefore, consumption of herbal medicine with antifungal activity and fewer side effects has become popular. This study is a systematic review to investigate the improvement and reduction of oral candidiasis symptoms by herbal compounds compared to conventional antifungal drugs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Magiran databases were searched from 1995 to 2021 based on the keywords of the question formula - oral candidiasis (P), herbal compounds (I), antifungal drugs (C), and improvement of clinical symptoms and laboratory tests (O) - to find related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English and Persian languages. Related articles were extracted based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and critically appraised using the modified-CONSORT checklist. The risk of bias was also assessed using the Cochrane tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After removing duplicates and checking the title and abstract of the articles, 98 articles from 1995 to November 2021 of 715 were reviewed. 83 RCTs were excluded due to non-relevancy and 15 remained for critical appraisal, of which 5 articles were rejected. Finally, 10 articles were included in the systematic review. Based on the risk of bias assessment, one article had low risk, 6 articles had unclear risk, and 3 articles had a high risk of bias. Herbal compounds were applied in the form of gel in 3 articles, in the form of ointment and mouthwash in 1 and 6 articles, respectively. In terms of clinical improvement and laboratory findings, herbal compound mouthwashes and ointment did not have a significant difference from conventional antifungal drugs, but the articles related to compound gels reported variable effects (better, similar, and weaker). Furthermore, herbal compounds generally had more patient satisfaction than antifungal drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that herbal compounds have clinical applications in the treatment of oral candidiasis and gained more patients' satisfaction. To achieve more valid results, it is suggested to conduct more RCTs with a low risk of bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12251993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_415_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral candidiasis is one of the most common fungal infections affecting the oral mucosa. It is usually managed by taking antifungal medication that might result in side effects such as toxicity and drug resistance. Therefore, consumption of herbal medicine with antifungal activity and fewer side effects has become popular. This study is a systematic review to investigate the improvement and reduction of oral candidiasis symptoms by herbal compounds compared to conventional antifungal drugs.

Materials and methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Magiran databases were searched from 1995 to 2021 based on the keywords of the question formula - oral candidiasis (P), herbal compounds (I), antifungal drugs (C), and improvement of clinical symptoms and laboratory tests (O) - to find related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English and Persian languages. Related articles were extracted based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and critically appraised using the modified-CONSORT checklist. The risk of bias was also assessed using the Cochrane tool.

Results: After removing duplicates and checking the title and abstract of the articles, 98 articles from 1995 to November 2021 of 715 were reviewed. 83 RCTs were excluded due to non-relevancy and 15 remained for critical appraisal, of which 5 articles were rejected. Finally, 10 articles were included in the systematic review. Based on the risk of bias assessment, one article had low risk, 6 articles had unclear risk, and 3 articles had a high risk of bias. Herbal compounds were applied in the form of gel in 3 articles, in the form of ointment and mouthwash in 1 and 6 articles, respectively. In terms of clinical improvement and laboratory findings, herbal compound mouthwashes and ointment did not have a significant difference from conventional antifungal drugs, but the articles related to compound gels reported variable effects (better, similar, and weaker). Furthermore, herbal compounds generally had more patient satisfaction than antifungal drugs.

Conclusion: It seems that herbal compounds have clinical applications in the treatment of oral candidiasis and gained more patients' satisfaction. To achieve more valid results, it is suggested to conduct more RCTs with a low risk of bias.

中药制剂与抗真菌药物治疗口腔念珠菌病的比较:系统综述。
背景:口腔念珠菌病是影响口腔黏膜最常见的真菌感染之一。它通常是通过服用抗真菌药物来控制的,这可能会导致副作用,如毒性和耐药性。因此,服用具有抗真菌活性和较少副作用的草药已成为流行。本研究是一项系统的综述,以调查与传统抗真菌药物相比,草药化合物对口腔念珠菌病症状的改善和减轻。材料和方法:检索1995 - 2021年PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane和Magiran数据库,根据问题公式的关键词口腔念珠菌病(P)、草药化合物(I)、抗真菌药物(C)和临床症状和实验室检查的改善(O),查找相关的英语和波斯语随机对照试验(RCTs)。根据纳入和排除标准提取相关文章,并使用修改后的consort检查表进行严格评价。偏倚风险也使用Cochrane工具进行评估。结果:剔除重复、核对文章标题和摘要后,共检索到1995 - 2021年11月715篇文章中的98篇。83篇rct因不相关而被排除,15篇被保留用于批判性评价,其中5篇被拒绝。最终,10篇文章被纳入系统评价。根据偏倚风险评估,低风险1篇,不明确风险6篇,高偏倚风险3篇。草药化合物分别以凝胶形式应用于3篇文章,以软膏和漱口水形式应用于1篇和6篇文章。在临床改善和实验室结果方面,草药复方漱口水和软膏与常规抗真菌药物没有显著差异,但与复方凝胶相关的文章报道了不同的效果(更好、相似和更弱)。此外,草药类药物总体上比抗真菌药物有更高的患者满意度。结论:中药复方治疗口腔念珠菌病具有临床应用价值,患者满意度较高。为了获得更有效的结果,建议多开展低偏倚风险的rct。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信