Comparative evaluation of different methods of saliva decontamination on microshear bond strength of composite to composite: An in vitro study.

Q2 Dentistry
Dental Research Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/drj.drj_736_23
Sara Ordooei Javan, Reza Movahedian, Somayeh Hosseini Tabatabaei
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of different methods of saliva decontamination on microshear bond strength of composite to composite: An <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Sara Ordooei Javan, Reza Movahedian, Somayeh Hosseini Tabatabaei","doi":"10.4103/drj.drj_736_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the incremental technique of composite restorations, it is possible to be exposed to contamination of the oral environment. This study aimed to compare the effect of saliva contamination and different methods of saliva decontamination on microshear bond strength within composite surfaces.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study created 24 rectangular XT composite blocks using a silicone mold (24 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm). The blocks were divided into eight groups as follows: Group 1: Control group (without contamination); Group 2: Contaminated with saliva; Group 3: saliva + dried; Group 4: saliva + rinsed + dried; Group 5: saliva + rinsed + dried + Clearfil Self Etch Bond; Group 6: saliva + 96% ethanol alcohol; Group 7: saliva + chlorhexidine + rinsed + dried; and Group 8: saliva + rinseddried + All-Bond Universal bond. Fifteen tubes (0.7 mm × 1 mm) were attached to the prepared surfaces in each group, with five tubes allocated to each block. They were filled with composite and light-cured and stored in distilled water for 24 h. They were tested under a microshear test. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) test (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-way ANOVA test demonstrated significant differences among the groups concerning the mean bond strength (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Tukey's HSD test indicated that the bond strengths in groups 6 and 8 were similar to the control group, showing no significant difference. The lowest bond strength was observed in group 2, which measured 6 MPa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decontamination with rinsed + dried + All-Bond Universal bond and 96% ethanol alcohol were the most effective methods for improving the contaminated composites' microshear bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12251988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_736_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the incremental technique of composite restorations, it is possible to be exposed to contamination of the oral environment. This study aimed to compare the effect of saliva contamination and different methods of saliva decontamination on microshear bond strength within composite surfaces.

Materials and methods: This in vitro study created 24 rectangular XT composite blocks using a silicone mold (24 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm). The blocks were divided into eight groups as follows: Group 1: Control group (without contamination); Group 2: Contaminated with saliva; Group 3: saliva + dried; Group 4: saliva + rinsed + dried; Group 5: saliva + rinsed + dried + Clearfil Self Etch Bond; Group 6: saliva + 96% ethanol alcohol; Group 7: saliva + chlorhexidine + rinsed + dried; and Group 8: saliva + rinseddried + All-Bond Universal bond. Fifteen tubes (0.7 mm × 1 mm) were attached to the prepared surfaces in each group, with five tubes allocated to each block. They were filled with composite and light-cured and stored in distilled water for 24 h. They were tested under a microshear test. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) test (P < 0.05).

Results: One-way ANOVA test demonstrated significant differences among the groups concerning the mean bond strength (P < 0.001). Tukey's HSD test indicated that the bond strengths in groups 6 and 8 were similar to the control group, showing no significant difference. The lowest bond strength was observed in group 2, which measured 6 MPa.

Conclusion: Decontamination with rinsed + dried + All-Bond Universal bond and 96% ethanol alcohol were the most effective methods for improving the contaminated composites' microshear bond strength.

不同唾液去污方法对复合材料与复合材料微剪切结合强度的比较评价:体外研究。
背景:在复合修复的增量技术中,有可能暴露于口腔环境的污染。本研究旨在比较唾液污染和不同的唾液去污方法对复合材料表面微剪切结合强度的影响。材料与方法:体外实验采用硅胶模具(24mm × 10mm × 10mm)制作了24块矩形XT复合块。将积木分成8组,分别为:第1组:对照组(无污染);第二组:被唾液污染;第三组:唾液+干燥;第四组:唾液+冲洗+干燥;第五组:唾液+冲洗+干燥+ Clearfil自蚀刻粘接;第6组:唾液+ 96%乙醇乙醇;第七组:唾液+洗必泰+冲洗+干燥;第8组:唾液+漂洗干燥+ All-Bond万能键。每组15根试管(0.7 mm × 1 mm)附着在制备好的表面上,每个块分配5根试管。填充复合材料,光固化,在蒸馏水中保存24 h,进行微剪切试验。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD)检验(P < 0.05)。结果:单因素方差分析显示各组间的平均粘结强度有显著差异(P < 0.001)。Tukey’s HSD检验显示,第6、8组的粘结强度与对照组相似,无显著差异。2组的结合强度最低,为6 MPa。结论:采用漂洗+干燥+全键万能键和96%乙醇净化是提高污染复合材料微剪切粘接强度的最有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信