Cortical Vein Opacification Score Predicts Stroke Outcomes after Thrombectomy: A Frequentist and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Wei-Zhen Lu, Sen-Kuang Hou, Hui-An Lin, Peter C Hou, Chyi-Huey Bai, Sheng-Feng Lin
{"title":"Cortical Vein Opacification Score Predicts Stroke Outcomes after Thrombectomy: A Frequentist and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wei-Zhen Lu, Sen-Kuang Hou, Hui-An Lin, Peter C Hou, Chyi-Huey Bai, Sheng-Feng Lin","doi":"10.1159/000547357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Good cortical venous outflow has been considered in association with favorable functional outcomes (FFOs) for large vessel occlusion-related stroke patients treated after an intra-arterial endovascular thrombectomy (IA-EVT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diagnostic meta-analysis was performed using the index test of cortical vein opacification score (COVES) on computed tomographic angiography for prediction of 3-month FFOs (reference standard). Literature search for relevant articles was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2014, to July 8, 2024. The Bayesian analyses were conducted to estimate posttest probabilities (PTPs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies and 2,238 patients were enrolled. While excluding studies conducted in duplicated cohorts, four studies defined a favorable COVES as ≥1 and another four studies defined a favorable COVES as ≥3. In studies using a favorable COVES of ≥1, the COVES showed a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.97), a specificity of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.31-0.64) for predicting 3-month FFOs. With a pretest probability of an FFO of 0.19, the COVES increased the PTP to 0.28. In studies using a favorable COVES of ≥3, the COVES showed a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.58-0.88), a specificity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65-0.76) for predicting 3-month FFOs. On a pretest probability of an FFO by 0.19, the COVES increased the PTP to 0.37.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis showed the high sensitivity and moderate specificity of a COVES of ≥3 to select patients who can benefit from an IA-EVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Good cortical venous outflow has been considered in association with favorable functional outcomes (FFOs) for large vessel occlusion-related stroke patients treated after an intra-arterial endovascular thrombectomy (IA-EVT).

Methods: A diagnostic meta-analysis was performed using the index test of cortical vein opacification score (COVES) on computed tomographic angiography for prediction of 3-month FFOs (reference standard). Literature search for relevant articles was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2014, to July 8, 2024. The Bayesian analyses were conducted to estimate posttest probabilities (PTPs).

Results: Ten studies and 2,238 patients were enrolled. While excluding studies conducted in duplicated cohorts, four studies defined a favorable COVES as ≥1 and another four studies defined a favorable COVES as ≥3. In studies using a favorable COVES of ≥1, the COVES showed a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.97), a specificity of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.31-0.64) for predicting 3-month FFOs. With a pretest probability of an FFO of 0.19, the COVES increased the PTP to 0.28. In studies using a favorable COVES of ≥3, the COVES showed a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.58-0.88), a specificity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65-0.76) for predicting 3-month FFOs. On a pretest probability of an FFO by 0.19, the COVES increased the PTP to 0.37.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed the high sensitivity and moderate specificity of a COVES of ≥3 to select patients who can benefit from an IA-EVT.

皮质静脉混浊评分预测血栓切除术后卒中预后:频率分析和贝叶斯荟萃分析。
目的:对于动脉内血管内血栓切除术(IA-EVT)后治疗的大血管闭塞相关性卒中患者,良好的皮质静脉流出被认为与良好的功能结局(ffo)相关。方法:采用计算机断层血管造影皮质静脉混浊评分(COVES)指数检验预测3个月ffo(参考标准),进行诊断荟萃分析。2014年1月1日至2024年7月8日在PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库中检索相关文章。贝叶斯分析用于估计测试后概率。结果:纳入10项研究,2238例患者。在排除重复队列的研究后,有4项研究将COVES定义为≥1,另有4项研究将COVES定义为≥3。在COVES≥1的研究中,COVES预测3个月ffo的敏感性为0.86(95%置信区间(CI), 0.48-0.97),特异性为0.47 (95% CI, 0.31-0.64)。在前测概率为0.19的情况下,COVES将后测概率(PTP)提高到0.28。在COVES≥3的研究中,COVES预测3个月ffo的敏感性为0.76(95%可信区间(CI), 0.58-0.88),特异性为0.71 (95% CI, 0.65-0.76)。在预测FFO概率为0.19的情况下,COVES将PTP提高到0.37。结论:该荟萃分析显示,COVES≥3在选择可从IA-EVT获益的患者时具有高敏感性和中等特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信