A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Mortality between Inhospital versus Community-Onset Acute Ischemic Stroke.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Katrina Hannah Ignacio, Jotinder K Waraich, Faizan Khan, Umberto Pensato, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Bijoy Menon, Michael D Hill, Mohammed A Almekhlafi, Alexander A Leung
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Mortality between Inhospital versus Community-Onset Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Katrina Hannah Ignacio, Jotinder K Waraich, Faizan Khan, Umberto Pensato, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Bijoy Menon, Michael D Hill, Mohammed A Almekhlafi, Alexander A Leung","doi":"10.1159/000546822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients who experience inhospital strokes may suffer from delays in stroke recognition, delays to acute treatment and management. We aimed to assess evidence for the difference in mortality between patients with inhospital stroke and those with community-onset stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS (from inception to October 8, 2024) to identify studies comparing mortality outcomes for inhospital and community-onset stroke patients. We collected data on study characteristics, summarized the quality of evidence, evaluated risk of bias of studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and investigated clinical sources of heterogeneity. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled odds of mortality of inhospital stroke versus community-onset stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one studies, collectively with 3,038,211 patients, of whom 3% experienced inhospital stroke, were included in the review. Inhospital stroke patients had an approximately 2.3-fold higher odds of inhospital mortality (pooled OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.80-2.86; 32 patient cohorts) and 1.9-fold higher odds of 3-month mortality (pooled OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.43-2.45; 14 patient cohorts) compared to community-onset stroke patients. Meta-analyses stratified by acute treatment received and study characteristics revealed consistently higher odds of death among inhospital stroke patients compared to community-onset stroke patients. Acute treatment received, study setting, geographic region, and components of study quality were significant sources of heterogeneity. Most concerns in study quality were due to potential risks of confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a consistently higher odds of inhospital and 3-month mortality among inhospital acute ischemic stroke patients compared to their community-onset counterparts, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to reduce this disparity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients who experience inhospital strokes may suffer from delays in stroke recognition, delays to acute treatment and management. We aimed to assess evidence for the difference in mortality between patients with inhospital stroke and those with community-onset stroke.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS (from inception to October 8, 2024) to identify studies comparing mortality outcomes for inhospital and community-onset stroke patients. We collected data on study characteristics, summarized the quality of evidence, evaluated risk of bias of studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and investigated clinical sources of heterogeneity. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled odds of mortality of inhospital stroke versus community-onset stroke patients.

Results: Forty-one studies, collectively with 3,038,211 patients, of whom 3% experienced inhospital stroke, were included in the review. Inhospital stroke patients had an approximately 2.3-fold higher odds of inhospital mortality (pooled OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.80-2.86; 32 patient cohorts) and 1.9-fold higher odds of 3-month mortality (pooled OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.43-2.45; 14 patient cohorts) compared to community-onset stroke patients. Meta-analyses stratified by acute treatment received and study characteristics revealed consistently higher odds of death among inhospital stroke patients compared to community-onset stroke patients. Acute treatment received, study setting, geographic region, and components of study quality were significant sources of heterogeneity. Most concerns in study quality were due to potential risks of confounding.

Conclusion: There was a consistently higher odds of inhospital and 3-month mortality among inhospital acute ischemic stroke patients compared to their community-onset counterparts, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to reduce this disparity.

一项比较住院和社区发病急性缺血性卒中死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:住院卒中患者可能存在卒中识别延迟、急性治疗和管理延迟等问题。我们的目的是评估住院卒中患者和社区卒中患者死亡率差异的证据。方法:我们检索MEDLINE, EMBASE和SCOPUS(从成立到2024年10月8日),以确定比较住院和社区发病脑卒中患者死亡率结果的研究。我们收集了研究特征的数据,总结了证据的质量,使用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表评估了研究的偏倚风险,并调查了异质性的临床来源。我们进行了一项随机效应荟萃分析,以估计住院卒中患者与社区发病卒中患者的总死亡率。结果:41项研究共纳入3,038,211例患者,其中3%经历过院内卒中。住院卒中患者的住院死亡率大约高出2.3倍(合并OR为2.27;95% ci 1.80 - 2.86;32例患者队列)和3个月死亡率高出1.9倍(合并OR 1.87;95% ci 1.43-2.45;14例患者队列)与社区发病的脑卒中患者相比。按接受的急性治疗和研究特征分层的荟萃分析显示,住院卒中患者的死亡率始终高于社区发病卒中患者。接受的急性治疗、研究环境、地理区域和研究质量的组成部分是异质性的重要来源。对研究质量的大多数担忧是由于潜在的混杂风险。结论:与社区发病的急性缺血性脑卒中患者相比,住院急性缺血性脑卒中患者的住院死亡率和3个月死亡率始终较高,强调需要有针对性的干预措施来缩小这一差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信