Prediction and risk factor analysis of in-stent restenosis and revascularization after coronary stenting based on machine learning.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI:10.1159/000547438
Hao Ling, Chunli Song
{"title":"Prediction and risk factor analysis of in-stent restenosis and revascularization after coronary stenting based on machine learning.","authors":"Hao Ling, Chunli Song","doi":"10.1159/000547438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Effective prediction of in-stent restenosis and revascularization after coronary stent implantation and interventions targeting risk factors that may lead to these events in patients are crucial for their prevention and management. Methods Based on a C5.0 decision tree approach, data from 2,326 patients from two centers were included. We comprehensively analyzed 34 risk factors that may affect in-stent restenosis and revascularization after stent implantation and conducted predictions and risk factor analyses for in-stent restenosis and revascularization following coronary stent implantation. Results The accuracy of predicting in-stent restenosis following coronary stent implantation with a median follow-up period of 30 months was as follows: area under the curve (AUC) in the training set; 0.996, AUC in the internal validation set; 0.988, and AUC in the external validation set; 0.889, with an f1 value of 0.95, a sensitivity of 99.16%, and a specificity of 91.72%. Additionally, the accuracy of revascularization prediction was as follows: AUC in the training set; 0.984, AUC in the internal validation set; 0.956, and AUC in the external validation set; 0.876, with an f1 value of 0.84, a sensitivity of 96.43%, and a specificity of 25%. We also conducted a risk factor analysis. Conclusion We successfully constructed a predictive and risk factor analysis model for in-stent restenosis and revascularization following coronary stent implantation. This model may be helpful for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Effective prediction of in-stent restenosis and revascularization after coronary stent implantation and interventions targeting risk factors that may lead to these events in patients are crucial for their prevention and management. Methods Based on a C5.0 decision tree approach, data from 2,326 patients from two centers were included. We comprehensively analyzed 34 risk factors that may affect in-stent restenosis and revascularization after stent implantation and conducted predictions and risk factor analyses for in-stent restenosis and revascularization following coronary stent implantation. Results The accuracy of predicting in-stent restenosis following coronary stent implantation with a median follow-up period of 30 months was as follows: area under the curve (AUC) in the training set; 0.996, AUC in the internal validation set; 0.988, and AUC in the external validation set; 0.889, with an f1 value of 0.95, a sensitivity of 99.16%, and a specificity of 91.72%. Additionally, the accuracy of revascularization prediction was as follows: AUC in the training set; 0.984, AUC in the internal validation set; 0.956, and AUC in the external validation set; 0.876, with an f1 value of 0.84, a sensitivity of 96.43%, and a specificity of 25%. We also conducted a risk factor analysis. Conclusion We successfully constructed a predictive and risk factor analysis model for in-stent restenosis and revascularization following coronary stent implantation. This model may be helpful for clinical decision-making.

基于机器学习的冠状动脉支架植入术后支架内再狭窄及血运重建术预测及危险因素分析。
背景有效预测冠状动脉支架植入术后支架内再狭窄和血运重建术,并针对可能导致这些事件的危险因素进行干预,对其预防和管理至关重要。方法采用C5.0决策树方法,纳入来自两个中心的2326例患者的数据。我们综合分析了34个可能影响支架植入术后支架内再狭窄和血运重建的危险因素,并对冠状动脉支架植入术后支架内再狭窄和血运重建进行了预测和危险因素分析。结果在中位随访30个月期间,预测冠状动脉支架植入术后支架内再狭窄的准确率为:训练集曲线下面积(AUC);内部验证集的AUC为0.996;0.988,外部验证集的AUC;0.889, f1值为0.95,敏感性为99.16%,特异性为91.72%。此外,血运重建预测的准确性为:训练集的AUC;0.984,内部验证集的AUC;0.956,外部验证集中的AUC;0.876, f1值0.84,敏感性96.43%,特异性25%。我们还进行了风险因素分析。结论成功构建了冠状动脉支架植入术后支架内再狭窄及血运重建术的预测及危险因素分析模型。该模型可能有助于临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信