Efficacy of Intensive Short-term Dynamic Psychotherapy, Laser Acupuncture, and the Combination in Major Depression.

IF 1.1 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arista Shojaeddin, Fariba Jafarian Namini, Zahra Razzaghi, Allan Abbass, Nima Ghorbani
{"title":"Efficacy of Intensive Short-term Dynamic Psychotherapy, Laser Acupuncture, and the Combination in Major Depression.","authors":"Arista Shojaeddin, Fariba Jafarian Namini, Zahra Razzaghi, Allan Abbass, Nima Ghorbani","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2024.5960.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While major depression has been treated with laser acupuncture (LA) and intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP), the relative efficacy of these two methods and their combination is unclear. ISTDP is a form of dynamic psychotherapy that enables the experience and processing of blocked complex feelings, while LA is based on the opening of blocked energy meridians. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of LA and ISTDP and their combination in treating major depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was carried out with 45 depressed patients on three equal arms (15 patients in each group): Group I) LA, group II) ISTDP, and group III) combined LA and ISTDP. The participants were evaluated at six time points using the Hamilton rating depression scale (HDRS), structured clinical interview for structured clinical interview for DSM (SCID), and symptom checklist-90 (SCL90), including baseline, session 8, session 12, 1-month follow-up, 2-month follow-up, and 3- month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HDRS and SCID ratings showed within-group reductions in SCL90 and HDRS scores in the three groups over time. At one of the follow-up times, combined LA+ISTDP showed a greater reduction than either individual treatment on the SCL-90 depression subscale but not on HDRS or SCID.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on releasing blocked energies, the results of this study indicate that LA and ISTDP are effective in treating major depression. The combination of the two methods may be more effective in reducing depression symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":8701,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"16 1","pages":"131-142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2024.5960.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While major depression has been treated with laser acupuncture (LA) and intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP), the relative efficacy of these two methods and their combination is unclear. ISTDP is a form of dynamic psychotherapy that enables the experience and processing of blocked complex feelings, while LA is based on the opening of blocked energy meridians. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of LA and ISTDP and their combination in treating major depression.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was carried out with 45 depressed patients on three equal arms (15 patients in each group): Group I) LA, group II) ISTDP, and group III) combined LA and ISTDP. The participants were evaluated at six time points using the Hamilton rating depression scale (HDRS), structured clinical interview for structured clinical interview for DSM (SCID), and symptom checklist-90 (SCL90), including baseline, session 8, session 12, 1-month follow-up, 2-month follow-up, and 3- month follow-up.

Results: HDRS and SCID ratings showed within-group reductions in SCL90 and HDRS scores in the three groups over time. At one of the follow-up times, combined LA+ISTDP showed a greater reduction than either individual treatment on the SCL-90 depression subscale but not on HDRS or SCID.

Conclusion: Based on releasing blocked energies, the results of this study indicate that LA and ISTDP are effective in treating major depression. The combination of the two methods may be more effective in reducing depression symptoms.

Abstract Image

短期强化动态心理治疗、激光针刺及联合治疗重度抑郁症的疗效观察。
虽然激光针灸(LA)和强化短期动态心理治疗(ISTDP)治疗重度抑郁症,但这两种方法及其联合治疗的相对疗效尚不清楚。ISTDP是一种动态心理治疗的形式,能够体验和处理阻塞的复杂情感,而LA则是基于打开阻塞的能量经络。本研究旨在比较LA和ISTDP及其联合治疗重度抑郁症的疗效。方法:随机对照试验45例抑郁症患者,分为三组(每组15例):ⅰ组LA,ⅱ组ISTDP,ⅲ组LA + ISTDP。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)、DSM结构化临床访谈的结构化临床访谈(SCID)和症状检查表-90 (SCL90)在6个时间点对参与者进行评估,包括基线、第8期、第12期、1个月随访、2个月随访和3个月随访。结果:HDRS和SCID评分显示,随着时间的推移,三组患者的SCL90和HDRS评分均在组内降低。在其中一次随访中,LA+ISTDP联合治疗在SCL-90抑郁亚量表上显示出比单独治疗更大的降低,但在HDRS或SCID上没有。结论:基于阻滞能的释放,本研究结果提示LA和ISTDP治疗重度抑郁症有效。这两种方法的结合可能更有效地减轻抑郁症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: BCN is an international multidisciplinary journal that publishes editorials, original full-length research articles, short communications, reviews, methodological papers, commentaries, perspectives and “news and reports” in the broad fields of developmental, molecular, cellular, system, computational, behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. No area in the neural related sciences is excluded from consideration, although priority is given to studies that provide applied insights into the functioning of the nervous system. BCN aims to advance our understanding of organization and function of the nervous system in health and disease, thereby improving the diagnosis and treatment of neural-related disorders. Manuscripts submitted to BCN should describe novel results generated by experiments that were guided by clearly defined aims or hypotheses. BCN aims to provide serious ties in interdisciplinary communication, accessibility to a broad readership inside Iran and the region and also in all other international academic sites, effective peer review process, and independence from all possible non-scientific interests. BCN also tries to empower national, regional and international collaborative networks in the field of neuroscience in Iran, Middle East, Central Asia and North Africa and to be the voice of the Iranian and regional neuroscience community in the world of neuroscientists. In this way, the journal encourages submission of editorials, review papers, commentaries, methodological notes and perspectives that address this scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信