Effect of Anticholinergic Medications on the Risk of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol.

IF 1.1 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Elham Maraghi, Ali Reza Safarpour, Maryam Hajmohammadi, Ali Akbar Oroojan, Amal Saki Malehi, Hadis Ashrafizadeh
{"title":"Effect of Anticholinergic Medications on the Risk of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol.","authors":"Elham Maraghi, Ali Reza Safarpour, Maryam Hajmohammadi, Ali Akbar Oroojan, Amal Saki Malehi, Hadis Ashrafizadeh","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2022.3823.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The most frequent dementia is senile dementia or Alzheimer disease. Meanwhile, anticholinergic drugs can potentially modify the risk factors. As different studies have achieved dissimilar results and the clinical findings of these interventions have not been conclusive, the objective of this research will be to evaluate the effect of anticholinergic drugs on the risk of dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis with no language limitation will search WoS, EMBASE, and MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest electronic databases, and Grey Literature between December 15, 1988, and December 15, 2021. Our search strategy with suitability criteria covers cohort, case-control, nested case-control, randomized, and non-randomized clinical trial studies evaluating the effect of anticholinergic drugs on the risk of dementia. Two authors will independently implement the selection phase, data extraction, and quality assessment. The reviewers will evaluate the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa, Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I (risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions) quality assessment scale. We will conduct a meta-analysis with a random or fixed effect model according to the severity of methodological heterogeneity. The results will be presented via the forest plot for the final studies' data composition, demonstrating the separated and combined frequency and their corresponding 95% CIs, summary tables, and narrative summaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of different studies in this field are various. This study's findings and other studies will help physicians and other health professionals before prescribing these drugs. Older people, especially those with polypharmacy, should be carefully assessed for the risk of dementia, Alzheimer or a variety of cognitive disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":8701,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"16 1","pages":"55-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.3823.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The most frequent dementia is senile dementia or Alzheimer disease. Meanwhile, anticholinergic drugs can potentially modify the risk factors. As different studies have achieved dissimilar results and the clinical findings of these interventions have not been conclusive, the objective of this research will be to evaluate the effect of anticholinergic drugs on the risk of dementia.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis with no language limitation will search WoS, EMBASE, and MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest electronic databases, and Grey Literature between December 15, 1988, and December 15, 2021. Our search strategy with suitability criteria covers cohort, case-control, nested case-control, randomized, and non-randomized clinical trial studies evaluating the effect of anticholinergic drugs on the risk of dementia. Two authors will independently implement the selection phase, data extraction, and quality assessment. The reviewers will evaluate the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa, Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I (risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions) quality assessment scale. We will conduct a meta-analysis with a random or fixed effect model according to the severity of methodological heterogeneity. The results will be presented via the forest plot for the final studies' data composition, demonstrating the separated and combined frequency and their corresponding 95% CIs, summary tables, and narrative summaries.

Conclusion: The results of different studies in this field are various. This study's findings and other studies will help physicians and other health professionals before prescribing these drugs. Older people, especially those with polypharmacy, should be carefully assessed for the risk of dementia, Alzheimer or a variety of cognitive disorders.

抗胆碱能药物对痴呆风险的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析方案。
最常见的痴呆是老年性痴呆或阿尔茨海默病。同时,抗胆碱能药物可以潜在地改变危险因素。由于不同的研究取得了不同的结果,并且这些干预措施的临床结果尚未结论性,因此本研究的目的将是评估抗胆碱能药物对痴呆风险的影响。方法:本系统综述和meta分析无语言限制,通过PubMed、Scopus、ProQuest电子数据库和灰色文献检索1988年12月15日至2021年12月15日期间的WoS、EMBASE和MEDLINE。我们的搜索策略与适用性标准包括队列、病例对照、巢式病例对照、随机和非随机临床试验研究,评估抗胆碱能药物对痴呆风险的影响。两位作者将独立完成选择阶段、数据提取和质量评估。审稿人将使用Newcastle-Ottawa、Cochrane偏倚风险工具和ROBINS-I(非随机研究的偏倚风险干预)质量评估量表来评估偏倚风险。我们将根据方法学异质性的严重程度,采用随机或固定效应模型进行meta分析。结果将通过森林图呈现,用于最终研究的数据组成,显示分离和组合频率及其相应的95% ci,汇总表和叙述性摘要。结论:不同领域的研究结果不尽相同。这项研究的发现和其他研究将帮助医生和其他卫生专业人员在开这些药之前。老年人,特别是患有多种药物的老年人,应仔细评估其患痴呆、阿尔茨海默病或各种认知障碍的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: BCN is an international multidisciplinary journal that publishes editorials, original full-length research articles, short communications, reviews, methodological papers, commentaries, perspectives and “news and reports” in the broad fields of developmental, molecular, cellular, system, computational, behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. No area in the neural related sciences is excluded from consideration, although priority is given to studies that provide applied insights into the functioning of the nervous system. BCN aims to advance our understanding of organization and function of the nervous system in health and disease, thereby improving the diagnosis and treatment of neural-related disorders. Manuscripts submitted to BCN should describe novel results generated by experiments that were guided by clearly defined aims or hypotheses. BCN aims to provide serious ties in interdisciplinary communication, accessibility to a broad readership inside Iran and the region and also in all other international academic sites, effective peer review process, and independence from all possible non-scientific interests. BCN also tries to empower national, regional and international collaborative networks in the field of neuroscience in Iran, Middle East, Central Asia and North Africa and to be the voice of the Iranian and regional neuroscience community in the world of neuroscientists. In this way, the journal encourages submission of editorials, review papers, commentaries, methodological notes and perspectives that address this scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信