Exploring Psychological Impact of Legal Procedure and Victim Blaming on Women Domestic Violence Victims.

IF 1.8 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Pranjali, Jyoti Yadav, Aditya Veer Singh, Syed Sajid Husain Kazmi, Akanksha Singh
{"title":"Exploring Psychological Impact of Legal Procedure and Victim Blaming on Women Domestic Violence Victims.","authors":"Pranjali, Jyoti Yadav, Aditya Veer Singh, Syed Sajid Husain Kazmi, Akanksha Singh","doi":"10.1177/09727531251351063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Domestic violence includes pattern of abusive or coercive behaviours that occur over time and typically escalate in severity. These patterns of behaviour are directed to assert power, dominance, control and/or coercion over women in line with patriarchal notions of marriage. Prior literature had profoundly addressed the multi-factor implications of encounters with domestic violence, but the gap persists in the areas of societal victim-blaming and re-victimisation that occur during legal procedures.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research aimed at exploring the psychological impact of societal victim blaming and re-victimisation through legal procedures among domestic violence victims.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study adopted quantitative approach to address the research question. Ex-Post Facto research design was used. A representative sample of 100 women victims was selected through a purposive sampling technique. The dataset was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics to arrive at a meaningful conclusion.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Findings of the study reported that significant differences were observed in the victim-blaming attitudes, psychological distress and legal re-victimisation assessed across the age groups and type of abuse endured. Findings also suggested that victim-blaming attitudes legal re-victimisation significantly predicted psychological distress among participants with <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.117, suggesting a 11.7% variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of the study highlighted the catastrophic impact of victim-blaming attitudes and re-victimisation through legal procedures on various mental and psychological outcomes. Hence, this study presses on the importance of addressing the hurdles and psychological repercussions of legal procedures that victim had to encounter.</p>","PeriodicalId":7921,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"09727531251351063"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251351063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Domestic violence includes pattern of abusive or coercive behaviours that occur over time and typically escalate in severity. These patterns of behaviour are directed to assert power, dominance, control and/or coercion over women in line with patriarchal notions of marriage. Prior literature had profoundly addressed the multi-factor implications of encounters with domestic violence, but the gap persists in the areas of societal victim-blaming and re-victimisation that occur during legal procedures.

Purpose: This research aimed at exploring the psychological impact of societal victim blaming and re-victimisation through legal procedures among domestic violence victims.

Methods: The current study adopted quantitative approach to address the research question. Ex-Post Facto research design was used. A representative sample of 100 women victims was selected through a purposive sampling technique. The dataset was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics to arrive at a meaningful conclusion.

Result: Findings of the study reported that significant differences were observed in the victim-blaming attitudes, psychological distress and legal re-victimisation assessed across the age groups and type of abuse endured. Findings also suggested that victim-blaming attitudes legal re-victimisation significantly predicted psychological distress among participants with R 2 = 0.117, suggesting a 11.7% variability.

Conclusion: Findings of the study highlighted the catastrophic impact of victim-blaming attitudes and re-victimisation through legal procedures on various mental and psychological outcomes. Hence, this study presses on the importance of addressing the hurdles and psychological repercussions of legal procedures that victim had to encounter.

法律程序与受害者指责对女性家庭暴力受害者的心理影响探讨。
背景:家庭暴力包括随着时间的推移而发生的虐待或胁迫行为模式,其严重程度通常会升级。这些行为模式的目的是根据父权制的婚姻观念,对妇女施加权力、支配、控制和/或胁迫。先前的文献深刻地论述了遭遇家庭暴力的多因素影响,但在法律程序中发生的社会受害者指责和再次受害者方面,差距仍然存在。目的:本研究旨在探讨通过法律程序对家庭暴力受害者进行社会受害者指责和再受害的心理影响。方法:本研究采用定量方法解决研究问题。采用事后研究设计。通过有目的的抽样技术,选取了100名受害妇女的代表性样本。使用描述性和推断性统计分析数据集以得出有意义的结论。结果:研究结果表明,不同年龄群体和不同类型的受虐者在指责受害者的态度、心理困扰和法律上的再次受害方面存在显著差异。研究结果还表明,受害者责备态度和再次受害行为显著预测了参与者的心理困扰,r2 = 0.117,表明变异率为11.7%。结论:研究结果强调了指责受害者的态度和通过法律程序再次受害对各种精神和心理结果的灾难性影响。因此,这项研究强调了解决受害者必须遇到的法律程序的障碍和心理影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Neurosciences
Annals of Neurosciences NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信