Improving green infrastructure: Enhancing multidimensional benefits from a soil health perspective.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126549
Yifei Zhu, Shaxinyu Rui, Kailu Zhang, Xuewu Shen, Xiaoxia Sun, Jian Wang, Lixun Zhang, Yuntao Guan
{"title":"Improving green infrastructure: Enhancing multidimensional benefits from a soil health perspective.","authors":"Yifei Zhu, Shaxinyu Rui, Kailu Zhang, Xuewu Shen, Xiaoxia Sun, Jian Wang, Lixun Zhang, Yuntao Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Green infrastructure offers an effective solution to the challenges of runoff control, pollutant removal, and carbon storage in urban water management, but few studies have focused on optimizing the structure and effectiveness of the facilities themselves. This study evaluated the effects of five practical improvement measures, including the addition of herbaceous biochar (HB), wood biochar (WB), earthworm activity (EA), chemical fertilizer (CF) and leaf litter (LA), on green infrastructure in terms of carbon sequestration, pollution reduction, and, ultimately, soil health. The results showed that runoff control was more than 70 % in all groups, and the pollutant removal rates were total phosphorus (81.6 %-93.3 %), ammonia nitrogen (69.9 %-79.2 %), and chemical oxygen demand (42.0 %-61.9 %), respectively. Biochar significantly increased soil organic carbon (SOC) stock, with SOC stock reaching 52.5 Mg C/ha in HB and 25.0 Mg C/ha in WB. In terms of soil health, WB showed the highest soil quality index (2.57), an improvement of 25 % compared to the control group. The individual application of EA and LA showed limited effects. Overall, this study provides an important scientific basis for the optimal design and management of green infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"391 ","pages":"126549"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green infrastructure offers an effective solution to the challenges of runoff control, pollutant removal, and carbon storage in urban water management, but few studies have focused on optimizing the structure and effectiveness of the facilities themselves. This study evaluated the effects of five practical improvement measures, including the addition of herbaceous biochar (HB), wood biochar (WB), earthworm activity (EA), chemical fertilizer (CF) and leaf litter (LA), on green infrastructure in terms of carbon sequestration, pollution reduction, and, ultimately, soil health. The results showed that runoff control was more than 70 % in all groups, and the pollutant removal rates were total phosphorus (81.6 %-93.3 %), ammonia nitrogen (69.9 %-79.2 %), and chemical oxygen demand (42.0 %-61.9 %), respectively. Biochar significantly increased soil organic carbon (SOC) stock, with SOC stock reaching 52.5 Mg C/ha in HB and 25.0 Mg C/ha in WB. In terms of soil health, WB showed the highest soil quality index (2.57), an improvement of 25 % compared to the control group. The individual application of EA and LA showed limited effects. Overall, this study provides an important scientific basis for the optimal design and management of green infrastructure.

改善绿色基础设施:从土壤健康的角度提高多维效益。
绿色基础设施为城市水管理中的径流控制、污染物去除和碳储存提供了有效的解决方案,但很少有研究关注设施本身的结构和有效性优化。本研究评估了添加草本生物炭(HB)、木质生物炭(WB)、蚯蚓活性(EA)、化肥(CF)和凋落叶(LA)等5种实际改善措施在固碳、减少污染和最终改善土壤健康方面对绿色基础设施的影响。结果表明,各处理的径流控制率均在70%以上,污染物去除率分别为总磷(81.6% ~ 93.3%)、氨氮(69.9% ~ 79.2%)和化学需氧量(42.0% ~ 61.9%)。生物炭显著增加了土壤有机碳储量,HB和WB土壤有机碳储量分别达到52.5 Mg C/ha和25.0 Mg C/ha。在土壤健康方面,WB土壤质量指数最高,为2.57,比对照组提高了25%。单独应用EA和LA效果有限。本研究为绿色基础设施的优化设计和管理提供了重要的科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信