Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on ePROMs in Surgical Breast Cancer Follow-Up: A Mixed-Methods Study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stine Thestrup Hansen, Karin Piil, Volker-Jürgen Schmidt, Lotte Gebhard Ørsted, Lone Jørgensen
{"title":"Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on ePROMs in Surgical Breast Cancer Follow-Up: A Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"Stine Thestrup Hansen,&nbsp;Karin Piil,&nbsp;Volker-Jürgen Schmidt,&nbsp;Lotte Gebhard Ørsted,&nbsp;Lone Jørgensen","doi":"10.1155/ecc/8870031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> The growing number of breast cancer survivors underscores the need for tailored follow-up care, particularly focussing on person-centred outcomes in surgical follow-ups. Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) have the potential to enhance person-centred care (PCC) by systematically integrating patient perspectives into clinical practice. However, the barriers and facilitators for the utilization of ePROMs in surgical breast cancer follow-ups remain unclear.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> This study utilized a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected via a survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs) to assess their familiarity with and perspectives on ePROMs. These findings informed focussed ethnographic qualitative research, including participant observations and interviews, to explore the practical application of ePROMs in clinical practice. Data integration involved a joint display analysis to develop comprehensive insights.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> While most HCPs (88%) expressed interest in learning more about ePROMs, only 20% agreed that ePROMs improved treatment and care. Time constraints (reported by 56%) and limited system integration (68% were unfamiliar with access via EMR) were reported as key barriers. Nurses prioritized experiential and patient-specific approaches, often relying on intuition rather than systematic use of ePROMs, whereas surgeons viewed ePROMs as tools for improving resource allocation and surgical outcomes. Knowledge gaps and a lack of organizational support were prevalent, hindering the consistent application of ePROMs in routine care.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> ePROMs have untapped potential to transform surgical follow-ups in breast cancer care by aligning clinical practices with person-centred outcomes. Effective integration requires addressing technical and organizational barriers, enhancing HCPs’ competencies and fostering a supportive culture for systematic ePROM utilization. Tailored implementation strategies are a key to fully realizing the benefits of ePROMs in achieving PCC.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/8870031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/8870031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing number of breast cancer survivors underscores the need for tailored follow-up care, particularly focussing on person-centred outcomes in surgical follow-ups. Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) have the potential to enhance person-centred care (PCC) by systematically integrating patient perspectives into clinical practice. However, the barriers and facilitators for the utilization of ePROMs in surgical breast cancer follow-ups remain unclear.

Methods: This study utilized a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected via a survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs) to assess their familiarity with and perspectives on ePROMs. These findings informed focussed ethnographic qualitative research, including participant observations and interviews, to explore the practical application of ePROMs in clinical practice. Data integration involved a joint display analysis to develop comprehensive insights.

Results: While most HCPs (88%) expressed interest in learning more about ePROMs, only 20% agreed that ePROMs improved treatment and care. Time constraints (reported by 56%) and limited system integration (68% were unfamiliar with access via EMR) were reported as key barriers. Nurses prioritized experiential and patient-specific approaches, often relying on intuition rather than systematic use of ePROMs, whereas surgeons viewed ePROMs as tools for improving resource allocation and surgical outcomes. Knowledge gaps and a lack of organizational support were prevalent, hindering the consistent application of ePROMs in routine care.

Conclusions: ePROMs have untapped potential to transform surgical follow-ups in breast cancer care by aligning clinical practices with person-centred outcomes. Effective integration requires addressing technical and organizational barriers, enhancing HCPs’ competencies and fostering a supportive culture for systematic ePROM utilization. Tailored implementation strategies are a key to fully realizing the benefits of ePROMs in achieving PCC.

Abstract Image

医疗专业人员对乳腺癌手术随访中eprom的看法:一项混合方法研究
背景:越来越多的乳腺癌幸存者强调了量身定制的随访护理的必要性,特别是在手术随访中注重以人为中心的结果。电子患者报告结果测量(ePROMs)通过系统地将患者观点整合到临床实践中,具有增强以人为本的护理(PCC)的潜力。然而,在乳腺癌手术随访中使用eprom的障碍和促进因素尚不清楚。方法:本研究采用顺序解释混合方法设计。通过对医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的调查收集定量数据,以评估他们对eprom的熟悉程度和看法。这些发现为集中的民族志定性研究提供了信息,包括参与者观察和访谈,以探索eprom在临床实践中的实际应用。数据集成涉及联合显示分析,以开发全面的见解。结果:虽然大多数HCPs(88%)表示有兴趣更多地了解eprom,但只有20%的人同意eprom改善了治疗和护理。时间限制(56%)和有限的系统集成(68%的人不熟悉通过EMR访问)被认为是主要障碍。护士优先考虑经验和患者具体的方法,往往依赖于直觉而不是系统地使用eprom,而外科医生则将eprom视为改善资源分配和手术结果的工具。知识差距和缺乏组织支持是普遍存在的,阻碍了eprom在常规护理中的持续应用。结论:通过将临床实践与以人为中心的结果结合起来,eprom在改变乳腺癌手术随访方面具有未开发的潜力。有效的整合需要解决技术和组织障碍,提高hcp的能力,并培养系统ePROM利用的支持性文化。量身定制的实施策略是充分实现eprom在实现PCC方面的优势的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信