Assessing Connectivity Thresholds Under Habitat Loss Scenarios for Threatened Amphibians and Squamate Reptiles in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Cássia Teixeira, Gisele Lopes Nunes, Leonardo Carreira Trevelin, Daniel Paiva Silva, Ana Lúcia da Costa Prudente
{"title":"Assessing Connectivity Thresholds Under Habitat Loss Scenarios for Threatened Amphibians and Squamate Reptiles in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon","authors":"Cássia Teixeira,&nbsp;Gisele Lopes Nunes,&nbsp;Leonardo Carreira Trevelin,&nbsp;Daniel Paiva Silva,&nbsp;Ana Lúcia da Costa Prudente","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The extinction threshold hypothesis proposes a minimum of 30% habitat in a landscape to prevent isolation from affecting populations to local extinction. In this study, we tested scenarios of habitat loss in the landscape to evaluate whether the 30% habitat threshold is a good predictor of functional connectivity for 14 terrestrial herpetofauna species in eastern Brazilian Amazon landscapes. We evaluated functional connectivity across various habitat loss scenarios, utilizing species distribution models and landscape connectivity indices. We were able to demonstrate that below 32% habitat, overall regional connectivity in Southeastern Amazonia erodes, disturbing the ability of species to track environments within their climatic limits. However, species inhabiting montane savannahs in the region did not respond well to this 30% threshold and required the presence of sufficient areas to assess a possible decline. We also discovered that, when evaluated together, small patches in the landscape contributed to the integral connectivity of the study area and may demonstrate their importance as links between larger patches. Our results provide critical insights into the conservation needs of forest and montane savannah species, highlighting that while forest species adhere closely to a habitat threshold, montane savannah species require a different approach for conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71741","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extinction threshold hypothesis proposes a minimum of 30% habitat in a landscape to prevent isolation from affecting populations to local extinction. In this study, we tested scenarios of habitat loss in the landscape to evaluate whether the 30% habitat threshold is a good predictor of functional connectivity for 14 terrestrial herpetofauna species in eastern Brazilian Amazon landscapes. We evaluated functional connectivity across various habitat loss scenarios, utilizing species distribution models and landscape connectivity indices. We were able to demonstrate that below 32% habitat, overall regional connectivity in Southeastern Amazonia erodes, disturbing the ability of species to track environments within their climatic limits. However, species inhabiting montane savannahs in the region did not respond well to this 30% threshold and required the presence of sufficient areas to assess a possible decline. We also discovered that, when evaluated together, small patches in the landscape contributed to the integral connectivity of the study area and may demonstrate their importance as links between larger patches. Our results provide critical insights into the conservation needs of forest and montane savannah species, highlighting that while forest species adhere closely to a habitat threshold, montane savannah species require a different approach for conservation.

Abstract Image

巴西东部亚马逊地区濒危两栖动物和有鳞爬行动物栖息地丧失情景下的连通性阈值评估
灭绝阈值假说提出,在一个景观中至少有30%的栖息地,以防止隔离影响到种群的局部灭绝。在这项研究中,我们测试了景观中栖息地丧失的情景,以评估30%的栖息地阈值是否可以很好地预测巴西东部亚马逊地区14种陆生爬行动物物种的功能连通性。利用物种分布模型和景观连通性指数,对不同生境丧失情景下的功能连通性进行了评估。我们能够证明,低于32%的栖息地,亚马逊东南部的整体区域连通性受到侵蚀,干扰了物种在其气候限制内追踪环境的能力。然而,居住在该地区山地稀树草原的物种对这30%的阈值反应不佳,需要有足够的面积来评估可能的下降。我们还发现,当一起评估时,景观中的小斑块有助于研究区域的整体连通性,并可能显示出它们作为大斑块之间联系的重要性。我们的研究结果为森林和山地稀树草原物种的保护需求提供了重要的见解,强调森林物种密切遵循栖息地阈值,而山地稀树草原物种需要不同的保护方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信