Rajat Suhag, Lucrezia Angeli, Matteo Scampicchio, Giovanna Ferrentino
{"title":"From Quantity to Reactivity: Advancing Kinetic-Based Antioxidant Testing Methods for Natural Compounds and Food Applications","authors":"Rajat Suhag, Lucrezia Angeli, Matteo Scampicchio, Giovanna Ferrentino","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional antioxidant testing methods primarily focus on quantifying antioxidant capacity but fail to capture their reactivity and effectiveness over time. Kinetic-based methods provide a deeper understanding of antioxidant performance by assessing reaction rates and inhibition mechanisms. This review discusses the advanced kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods, including the integration of kinetic modeling in traditional assays like 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity, along with inhibited autoxidation methods based on isothermal calorimetry, oxygen uptake, and differential photocalorimetry (DPC). The principles, advantages, and limitations of these methods are discussed, along with their applications. Additionally, challenges related to instrumentation, standardization, and practical implementation are highlighted. Various kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods have been developed, each with its own set of advantages and limitations. Despite these differences, all these methods share one significant advantage: the ability to provide detailed kinetic information on antioxidant behavior. Continuous monitoring of antioxidant reactivity enables a deeper understanding of how these compounds function in inhibiting oxidation. Furthermore, most of these methods allow testing in real food-based oxidizable substrates, enhancing their relevance for food applications. Although techniques such as oxygen uptake and DPC may be limited by throughput capacity, methods like isothermal calorimetry and oxidizable substrate monitoring offer high-throughput capabilities, making them suitable for large-scale screening. This review presents a range of kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods that can be chosen and applied according to specific experimental requirements and convenience, providing flexibility to address various food-related oxidation challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70229","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70229","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditional antioxidant testing methods primarily focus on quantifying antioxidant capacity but fail to capture their reactivity and effectiveness over time. Kinetic-based methods provide a deeper understanding of antioxidant performance by assessing reaction rates and inhibition mechanisms. This review discusses the advanced kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods, including the integration of kinetic modeling in traditional assays like 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity, along with inhibited autoxidation methods based on isothermal calorimetry, oxygen uptake, and differential photocalorimetry (DPC). The principles, advantages, and limitations of these methods are discussed, along with their applications. Additionally, challenges related to instrumentation, standardization, and practical implementation are highlighted. Various kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods have been developed, each with its own set of advantages and limitations. Despite these differences, all these methods share one significant advantage: the ability to provide detailed kinetic information on antioxidant behavior. Continuous monitoring of antioxidant reactivity enables a deeper understanding of how these compounds function in inhibiting oxidation. Furthermore, most of these methods allow testing in real food-based oxidizable substrates, enhancing their relevance for food applications. Although techniques such as oxygen uptake and DPC may be limited by throughput capacity, methods like isothermal calorimetry and oxidizable substrate monitoring offer high-throughput capabilities, making them suitable for large-scale screening. This review presents a range of kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods that can be chosen and applied according to specific experimental requirements and convenience, providing flexibility to address various food-related oxidation challenges.
期刊介绍:
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology.
CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results.
Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity.
The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.