Herbicides Have Minimal and Variable Effects on the Structure and Function of Bacterial Communities in Agricultural Soils

IF 4.3 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Margaret Gaylord, Abigail Thompson, Franck E. Dayan, Andrew R. Kniss, Dave Reichert, Kristen Otto, Rebecca Larson, Pankaj Trivedi
{"title":"Herbicides Have Minimal and Variable Effects on the Structure and Function of Bacterial Communities in Agricultural Soils","authors":"Margaret Gaylord,&nbsp;Abigail Thompson,&nbsp;Franck E. Dayan,&nbsp;Andrew R. Kniss,&nbsp;Dave Reichert,&nbsp;Kristen Otto,&nbsp;Rebecca Larson,&nbsp;Pankaj Trivedi","doi":"10.1111/1462-2920.70148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Synthetic herbicides are relied on for weed management in the United States, and non-chemical alternatives, such as tillage, can be inefficient and expensive at an agricultural scale. Previous research examining the influence of weed management strategies on soil microbial communities has shown variability and inconsistency in experimental design and results. This study investigates the impact of repeated applications of glyphosate, a mixture of selective herbicides, and tillage on soil bacterial communities in sugar beet production across two locations in the United States. Using next-generation sequencing and various assays, we explore the effects on bacterial community structure, composition, and function related to nutrient cycling and soil health. Although transient and minor differences in bacterial community structure could be observed for herbicides and tillage, these statistical differences do not appear to be biologically relevant as the soil function was equivalent for all applied treatments. Our findings provide evidence that repeated herbicide usage does not directly impact soil health and function in sugar beet production. This study emphasises the need for well-replicated, field-realistic, and long-term experiments to understand the ecological consequences of herbicides and tillage in agroecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11898,"journal":{"name":"Environmental microbiology","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1462-2920.70148","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1462-2920.70148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synthetic herbicides are relied on for weed management in the United States, and non-chemical alternatives, such as tillage, can be inefficient and expensive at an agricultural scale. Previous research examining the influence of weed management strategies on soil microbial communities has shown variability and inconsistency in experimental design and results. This study investigates the impact of repeated applications of glyphosate, a mixture of selective herbicides, and tillage on soil bacterial communities in sugar beet production across two locations in the United States. Using next-generation sequencing and various assays, we explore the effects on bacterial community structure, composition, and function related to nutrient cycling and soil health. Although transient and minor differences in bacterial community structure could be observed for herbicides and tillage, these statistical differences do not appear to be biologically relevant as the soil function was equivalent for all applied treatments. Our findings provide evidence that repeated herbicide usage does not directly impact soil health and function in sugar beet production. This study emphasises the need for well-replicated, field-realistic, and long-term experiments to understand the ecological consequences of herbicides and tillage in agroecosystems.

Abstract Image

除草剂对农业土壤细菌群落结构和功能的影响是微小的和可变的
在美国,杂草管理依赖于合成除草剂,而非化学替代品,如耕作,在农业规模上可能效率低下且昂贵。以往关于杂草管理策略对土壤微生物群落影响的研究表明,实验设计和结果存在差异和不一致性。本研究调查了反复使用草甘膦(一种选择性除草剂的混合物)和耕作对美国两个地区甜菜生产中土壤细菌群落的影响。利用新一代测序和各种分析,我们探索了与养分循环和土壤健康相关的细菌群落结构、组成和功能的影响。虽然可以观察到除草剂和耕作方式在细菌群落结构上的短暂和微小差异,但这些统计差异似乎并不具有生物学相关性,因为所有施用处理的土壤功能都是相同的。我们的研究结果提供了证据,反复使用除草剂不会直接影响甜菜生产中的土壤健康和功能。这项研究强调需要进行充分复制的、实地实际的和长期的实验,以了解除草剂和耕作在农业生态系统中的生态后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental microbiology
Environmental microbiology 环境科学-微生物学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Microbiology provides a high profile vehicle for publication of the most innovative, original and rigorous research in the field. The scope of the Journal encompasses the diversity of current research on microbial processes in the environment, microbial communities, interactions and evolution and includes, but is not limited to, the following: the structure, activities and communal behaviour of microbial communities microbial community genetics and evolutionary processes microbial symbioses, microbial interactions and interactions with plants, animals and abiotic factors microbes in the tree of life, microbial diversification and evolution population biology and clonal structure microbial metabolic and structural diversity microbial physiology, growth and survival microbes and surfaces, adhesion and biofouling responses to environmental signals and stress factors modelling and theory development pollution microbiology extremophiles and life in extreme and unusual little-explored habitats element cycles and biogeochemical processes, primary and secondary production microbes in a changing world, microbially-influenced global changes evolution and diversity of archaeal and bacterial viruses new technological developments in microbial ecology and evolution, in particular for the study of activities of microbial communities, non-culturable microorganisms and emerging pathogens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信