Cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in Children With Cerebral Palsy

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Emine Sağlamoğlu, Ege Temizkan, Meral Huri, Gamze Ekici
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in Children With Cerebral Palsy","authors":"Emine Sağlamoğlu,&nbsp;Ege Temizkan,&nbsp;Meral Huri,&nbsp;Gamze Ekici","doi":"10.1111/cch.70139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Due to its complex nature, cerebral palsy (CP) leads to impairments in body structure and functions, decreased participation and affected occupational performance. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is commonly used with both children diagnosed with CP and their parents, but it has not been culturally adapted in this population. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the COPM when used directly with children with CP. A secondary aim involved translating the specific administration instructions into Turkish to facilitate child self-report.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>All analyses conducted to examine validity and reliability were performed using the COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) guideline. The scale and instructions were translated following Beaton's procedure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The discriminative construct validity analysis revealed no significant gender-based differences in COPM performance and satisfaction scores (<i>p</i> = 0.75, <i>p</i> = 0.11), indicating consistency across genders. Item analysis showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.76–0.81). Test–retest analysis demonstrated excellent reliability for time-related equability in COPM performance and satisfaction parameters (ICC &gt; 0.9).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The COPM is a valid and reliable measurement tool for children aged 8–18 with CP, with adapted instruction in Turkish.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55262,"journal":{"name":"Child Care Health and Development","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Care Health and Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cch.70139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Due to its complex nature, cerebral palsy (CP) leads to impairments in body structure and functions, decreased participation and affected occupational performance. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is commonly used with both children diagnosed with CP and their parents, but it has not been culturally adapted in this population. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the COPM when used directly with children with CP. A secondary aim involved translating the specific administration instructions into Turkish to facilitate child self-report.

Methods

All analyses conducted to examine validity and reliability were performed using the COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) guideline. The scale and instructions were translated following Beaton's procedure.

Results

The discriminative construct validity analysis revealed no significant gender-based differences in COPM performance and satisfaction scores (p = 0.75, p = 0.11), indicating consistency across genders. Item analysis showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.76–0.81). Test–retest analysis demonstrated excellent reliability for time-related equability in COPM performance and satisfaction parameters (ICC > 0.9).

Conclusion

The COPM is a valid and reliable measurement tool for children aged 8–18 with CP, with adapted instruction in Turkish.

加拿大脑瘫儿童职业表现量表土耳其语版的文化适应、效度和信度
背景:由于脑瘫的复杂性,它会导致身体结构和功能的损害,减少参与和影响职业表现。加拿大职业表现测量(COPM)通常用于诊断为CP的儿童及其父母,但在这一人群中尚未适应文化。本研究的主要目的是评估COPM直接用于CP儿童时的心理测量特性(效度和信度)。第二个目的是将具体的给药说明翻译成土耳其语,以促进儿童自我报告。方法采用COSMIN(基于共识的健康状况测量仪器选择标准)指南进行效度和信度分析。量表和说明是按照比顿的程序翻译的。结果辨别性构念效度分析显示,COPM绩效和满意度得分在性别上无显著差异(p = 0.75, p = 0.11),显示性别间的一致性。项目分析显示可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha: 0.76-0.81)。测试-重测试分析表明,COPM性能和满意度参数的时间相关稳定性具有出色的可靠性(ICC > 0.9)。结论COPM是8-18岁CP患儿的有效、可靠的测量工具,并配合土耳其语教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Child: care, health and development is an international, peer-reviewed journal which publishes papers dealing with all aspects of the health and development of children and young people. We aim to attract quantitative and qualitative research papers relevant to people from all disciplines working in child health. We welcome studies which examine the effects of social and environmental factors on health and development as well as those dealing with clinical issues, the organization of services and health policy. We particularly encourage the submission of studies related to those who are disadvantaged by physical, developmental, emotional and social problems. The journal also aims to collate important research findings and to provide a forum for discussion of global child health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信