Molly Asher, Mark Trigg, Steven Boïng, Cathryn Birch
{"title":"The Sensitivity of Urban Pluvial Flooding to the Temporal Distribution of Rainfall Within Design Storms","authors":"Molly Asher, Mark Trigg, Steven Boïng, Cathryn Birch","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The risk posed globally by pluvial flooding to people and properties is growing due to urbanisation, infrastructure development and intensification of rainfall due to climate change. Whilst tools to model pluvial flood hazard have also advanced, there remains a knowledge gap around whether design storms used in modelling adequately represent the temporal distribution of rainfall within the extreme convective storms which drive flooding. In the UK, the industry standard design storm considers rainfall events to always have a singular, central intensity peak. Study of UK extreme rainfall observations suggests that loading of rainfall towards the start or end of events is in fact more common. This study highlights the sensitivity of pluvial flood extent, hazard and timing to the shape of the design rainfall profile for two urban catchments in northern England. We demonstrate that for events with the same accumulated rainfall depth, there is up to a 25% increase in total flood-affected area with a back-loaded compared to a front-loaded profile. Failing to account for the variability in event profile shapes observed in real events may result in substantial inaccuracies in the design of flood risk management solutions, leading to both underestimation and overestimation of the required measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The risk posed globally by pluvial flooding to people and properties is growing due to urbanisation, infrastructure development and intensification of rainfall due to climate change. Whilst tools to model pluvial flood hazard have also advanced, there remains a knowledge gap around whether design storms used in modelling adequately represent the temporal distribution of rainfall within the extreme convective storms which drive flooding. In the UK, the industry standard design storm considers rainfall events to always have a singular, central intensity peak. Study of UK extreme rainfall observations suggests that loading of rainfall towards the start or end of events is in fact more common. This study highlights the sensitivity of pluvial flood extent, hazard and timing to the shape of the design rainfall profile for two urban catchments in northern England. We demonstrate that for events with the same accumulated rainfall depth, there is up to a 25% increase in total flood-affected area with a back-loaded compared to a front-loaded profile. Failing to account for the variability in event profile shapes observed in real events may result in substantial inaccuracies in the design of flood risk management solutions, leading to both underestimation and overestimation of the required measures.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind.
Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.