Discrimination of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Coupled With Machine Learning

IF 4.6 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Mari Nishikawa, Wenhao Tang, Markus Kostrzewa, Jonah Rodgus, Frances Davies, Yi Liu, Elita Jauneikaite, Gerald Larrouy-Maumus
{"title":"Discrimination of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Coupled With Machine Learning","authors":"Mari Nishikawa,&nbsp;Wenhao Tang,&nbsp;Markus Kostrzewa,&nbsp;Jonah Rodgus,&nbsp;Frances Davies,&nbsp;Yi Liu,&nbsp;Elita Jauneikaite,&nbsp;Gerald Larrouy-Maumus","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Klebsiella</i> species, including <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and <i>Klebsiella quasipneumoniae</i>, present significant challenges in clinical microbiology due to their genetic similarity, which complicates accurate species identification using established methods, including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) on the protein/peptide level. Although the treatment choice for infections caused by these pathogens is often similar, precise species characterization enhances our epidemiological understanding. While whole-genome sequencing can accurately distinguish <i>Klebsiella</i> species accurately, those analyses are time-consuming, requiring specialized expertise, and are not currently used in routine clinical laboratories. Therefore, developing a timely and accurate pathogen characterization method is essential for effective treatment, management, and infection control measures. This study combined MALDI-TOF MS in negative ion mode with machine learning techniques to identify potential lipid biomarkers as a novel method to distinguish between <i>K. pneumoniae</i> and <i>K. quasipneumoniae</i>. Using this method, we identified discriminative features between the species, with peaks at <i>m/z</i> 2157, <i>m/z</i> 1931, <i>m/z</i> 1964, <i>m/z</i> 2042, and <i>m/z</i> 1407 highlighted as potential biomarkers for species identification. Our findings suggest that the lipid profiles of the species obtained from MALDI-TOF MS can serve as effective biomarkers for distinguishing <i>Klebsiella</i> species. Further research should focus on the structural identification of these biomarkers and expand the data set to include more isolates for each of the species. This approach holds promise for developing more cost-effective and rapid diagnostic tools in clinical microbiology, ultimately improving patient outcomes and infection control.</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Klebsiella species, including Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae, present significant challenges in clinical microbiology due to their genetic similarity, which complicates accurate species identification using established methods, including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) on the protein/peptide level. Although the treatment choice for infections caused by these pathogens is often similar, precise species characterization enhances our epidemiological understanding. While whole-genome sequencing can accurately distinguish Klebsiella species accurately, those analyses are time-consuming, requiring specialized expertise, and are not currently used in routine clinical laboratories. Therefore, developing a timely and accurate pathogen characterization method is essential for effective treatment, management, and infection control measures. This study combined MALDI-TOF MS in negative ion mode with machine learning techniques to identify potential lipid biomarkers as a novel method to distinguish between K. pneumoniae and K. quasipneumoniae. Using this method, we identified discriminative features between the species, with peaks at m/z 2157, m/z 1931, m/z 1964, m/z 2042, and m/z 1407 highlighted as potential biomarkers for species identification. Our findings suggest that the lipid profiles of the species obtained from MALDI-TOF MS can serve as effective biomarkers for distinguishing Klebsiella species. Further research should focus on the structural identification of these biomarkers and expand the data set to include more isolates for each of the species. This approach holds promise for developing more cost-effective and rapid diagnostic tools in clinical microbiology, ultimately improving patient outcomes and infection control.

Abstract Image

结合机器学习的MALDI-TOF质谱法鉴别肺炎克雷伯菌和准肺炎克雷伯菌
克雷伯菌属,包括肺炎克雷伯菌和准肺炎克雷伯菌,由于其遗传相似性,在临床微生物学中面临重大挑战,这使得使用现有方法(包括基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS))在蛋白质/肽水平上进行准确的物种鉴定变得复杂。虽然这些病原体引起的感染的治疗选择通常是相似的,但精确的物种特征增强了我们对流行病学的理解。虽然全基因组测序可以准确地区分克雷伯氏菌的种类,但这些分析是耗时的,需要专门的专业知识,目前还没有在常规临床实验室中使用。因此,建立一种及时准确的病原体鉴定方法对于有效的治疗、管理和感染控制措施至关重要。本研究结合负离子模式MALDI-TOF MS和机器学习技术,鉴定潜在的脂质生物标志物,作为区分肺炎克雷伯菌和准肺炎克雷伯菌的新方法。利用该方法,我们确定了物种之间的区别特征,m/z 2157, m/z 1931, m/z 1964, m/z 2042和m/z 1407的峰被强调为物种鉴定的潜在生物标志物。我们的研究结果表明,从MALDI-TOF MS中获得的物种脂质谱可以作为区分克雷伯氏菌物种的有效生物标志物。进一步的研究应集中在这些生物标记物的结构鉴定上,并扩大数据集,以包括每个物种的更多分离物。这种方法有望在临床微生物学中开发更具成本效益和快速的诊断工具,最终改善患者预后和感染控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MicrobiologyOpen
MicrobiologyOpen MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes. MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to: - agriculture - antimicrobial resistance - astrobiology - biochemistry - biotechnology - cell and molecular biology - clinical microbiology - computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology - environmental science - evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics - food science and technology - genetics and genomics - geobiology and earth science - host-microbe interactions - infectious diseases - natural products discovery - pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry - physiology - plant pathology - veterinary microbiology We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses. The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations. MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信