Environmental externalities of corporate culture: Evidence from firm pollution

Wenquan Li, Suman Neupane, Kelvin Jui Keng Tan
{"title":"Environmental externalities of corporate culture: Evidence from firm pollution","authors":"Wenquan Li, Suman Neupane, Kelvin Jui Keng Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the relationship between corporate culture and firms’ environmental policies. We find that a strong corporate culture is associated with lower toxic emission levels and reduced pollution intensity. These reductions are genuine and not the result of “greenwashing,” as these firms mitigate harmful toxic releases without selectively targeting specific environmental regulations. The primary cultural values associated with the reduction in toxic emissions include teamwork, innovation, respect, and integrity. To alleviate potential endogeneity concerns, we exploit a quasi-natural experiment based on the forced departures of CEOs due to the sudden public exposure of legal violations or concerns. We also employ a propensity score matching approach and use alternative measures of firms’ environmental externalities. Furthermore, we find that diversity and research and development (R&D) expenses are among the potential channels through which this effect occurs. Importantly, the reduction in firms’ toxic releases does not come at the expense of production. Finally, the negative relationship between corporate culture and firm pollution is concentrated in plants located outside the headquarters’ state and in counties with nonattainment status.","PeriodicalId":501001,"journal":{"name":"The British Accounting Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between corporate culture and firms’ environmental policies. We find that a strong corporate culture is associated with lower toxic emission levels and reduced pollution intensity. These reductions are genuine and not the result of “greenwashing,” as these firms mitigate harmful toxic releases without selectively targeting specific environmental regulations. The primary cultural values associated with the reduction in toxic emissions include teamwork, innovation, respect, and integrity. To alleviate potential endogeneity concerns, we exploit a quasi-natural experiment based on the forced departures of CEOs due to the sudden public exposure of legal violations or concerns. We also employ a propensity score matching approach and use alternative measures of firms’ environmental externalities. Furthermore, we find that diversity and research and development (R&D) expenses are among the potential channels through which this effect occurs. Importantly, the reduction in firms’ toxic releases does not come at the expense of production. Finally, the negative relationship between corporate culture and firm pollution is concentrated in plants located outside the headquarters’ state and in counties with nonattainment status.
企业文化的环境外部性:来自企业污染的证据
本文考察了企业文化与企业环境政策之间的关系。我们发现,强大的企业文化与较低的有毒物质排放水平和污染强度有关。这些减少是真实的,而不是“洗绿”的结果,因为这些公司减轻了有害的有毒物质排放,而没有选择性地针对特定的环境法规。与减少有毒物质排放相关的主要文化价值观包括团队合作、创新、尊重和诚信。为了减轻潜在的内生性问题,我们利用了一个准自然实验,该实验基于首席执行官因突然公开曝光的违法行为或问题而被迫离职。我们还采用倾向得分匹配方法,并使用企业环境外部性的替代措施。此外,我们发现多样性和研发(R&;D)费用是这种效应发生的潜在渠道。重要的是,企业有毒物质排放的减少并不是以牺牲生产为代价的。最后,企业文化与企业污染之间的负相关关系主要集中在总部所在州以外的工厂和不达标县。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信