Audit partners' and associates’ insights and experiences of remote work in response to a global crisis Event: Implications for the profession and future directions

Danielle R. Lombardi, Janice C. Sipior, Deniz A. Appelbaum
{"title":"Audit partners' and associates’ insights and experiences of remote work in response to a global crisis Event: Implications for the profession and future directions","authors":"Danielle R. Lombardi, Janice C. Sipior, Deniz A. Appelbaum","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote work was forced upon employees due to a worldwide crisis event. As some form of remote work continues, we draw upon psychology research which identifies four areas of concern: unemployment and job insecurity, employment disparities, work-family interface, and employee mental health issues. We adapt a conceptual framework to evaluate the negative effects caused by disruptive events and respective problem-focused mitigation strategies implemented by audit firms. The results of semi-structured interviews with audit partners and associates reveal the greatest overall concern for audit partners is employee mental health issues, with associates reporting inconsistent effectiveness of improvement tactics. Work-family interface remains a challenge, and even more so during a crisis event. Regarding employment disparities and development, all agree the apprenticeship model suffers in a remote environment. The area of least overall concern is unemployment and job insecurity. However, for audit partners, the greatest employment issue is hiring and retention. The findings emphasize the need for audit firms to invest in strategies to mitigate these effects of remote work and for additional research that evaluates and supports these efforts.","PeriodicalId":501001,"journal":{"name":"The British Accounting Review","volume":"680 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote work was forced upon employees due to a worldwide crisis event. As some form of remote work continues, we draw upon psychology research which identifies four areas of concern: unemployment and job insecurity, employment disparities, work-family interface, and employee mental health issues. We adapt a conceptual framework to evaluate the negative effects caused by disruptive events and respective problem-focused mitigation strategies implemented by audit firms. The results of semi-structured interviews with audit partners and associates reveal the greatest overall concern for audit partners is employee mental health issues, with associates reporting inconsistent effectiveness of improvement tactics. Work-family interface remains a challenge, and even more so during a crisis event. Regarding employment disparities and development, all agree the apprenticeship model suffers in a remote environment. The area of least overall concern is unemployment and job insecurity. However, for audit partners, the greatest employment issue is hiring and retention. The findings emphasize the need for audit firms to invest in strategies to mitigate these effects of remote work and for additional research that evaluates and supports these efforts.
审计合伙人和合伙人应对全球危机事件远程工作的见解和经验:对行业和未来方向的影响
由于全球性的危机事件,员工被迫进行远程工作。随着某种形式的远程工作的继续,我们借鉴了心理学研究,确定了四个值得关注的领域:失业和工作不安全感、就业差距、工作家庭界面和员工心理健康问题。我们调整了一个概念框架,以评估破坏性事件造成的负面影响以及审计公司实施的以问题为重点的缓解战略。对审计合伙人和员工的半结构化访谈的结果显示,审计合伙人最关心的是员工的心理健康问题,员工报告的改进策略的有效性不一致。工作与家庭的关系仍然是一个挑战,在危机事件中更是如此。关于就业差距和发展,所有人都同意学徒模式在偏远环境中受到影响。总体而言,人们最不关心的是失业和工作不稳定。然而,对于审计合伙人来说,最大的就业问题是招聘和保留。研究结果强调,审计公司需要投资于减轻远程工作影响的策略,并需要进行更多的研究来评估和支持这些努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信