Electroencephalographic Phase Synchrony Index as a Biomarker of Post-Stroke Aphasia Recovery.

IF 3.7
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-13 DOI:10.1177/15459683251347629
Teiji Kawano, Noriaki Hattori, Yutaka Uno, Megumi Hatakenaka, Hajime Yagura, Hiroaki Fujimoto, Keiichi Kitajo, Ichiro Miyai
{"title":"Electroencephalographic Phase Synchrony Index as a Biomarker of Post-Stroke Aphasia Recovery.","authors":"Teiji Kawano, Noriaki Hattori, Yutaka Uno, Megumi Hatakenaka, Hajime Yagura, Hiroaki Fujimoto, Keiichi Kitajo, Ichiro Miyai","doi":"10.1177/15459683251347629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPost-stroke aphasia is considered a language network disorder, and neuroimaging may help understand network alterations. However, the prediction of aphasia recovery remains challenging.ObjectiveWe aimed to explore biomarkers for aphasia recovery using a novel clinically feasible method, which we previously reported as useful for evaluating motor recovery, that included the phase synchrony index (PSI) obtained from resting-state 19-channel electroencephalography.MethodsThis longitudinal observational study included patients with left frontal ischemic lesions admitted for post-acute rehabilitation. We recorded electroencephalograms at the time of admission. Recovery was defined as a change in composite speech score. Based on electrode settings, we focused on 4 language-related networks: (1) left front-temporal, (2) right front-temporal, (3) inter-frontal, and (4) inter-temporal networks. We first evaluated the correlation between these network PSIs and recovery scores and then the predictive potential of our method using the receiver operating characteristic curve and multivariable regression analyses.ResultsWe enrolled 24 patients. Electroencephalograms were recorded for a median of 37.0 days after the stroke. The median speech therapy time was 53.7 hours. Inter-temporal PSI (gamma band) was significantly positively correlated with recovery scores (ρ = .642; 95% confidence interval = 0.311-0.834; <i>P</i> = .017). The PSI could predict patients with good recovery (sensitivity = 84.6%; specificity = 90.9%), and the inter-temporal PSIs were useful in predicting recovery (adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .545).ConclusionsOur results revealed an association between the posterior language network adaptive response and speech recovery in patients with frontal lesions. The PSI may reflect post-stroke network alterations and may be a biomarker of aphasia recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"839-850"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251347629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPost-stroke aphasia is considered a language network disorder, and neuroimaging may help understand network alterations. However, the prediction of aphasia recovery remains challenging.ObjectiveWe aimed to explore biomarkers for aphasia recovery using a novel clinically feasible method, which we previously reported as useful for evaluating motor recovery, that included the phase synchrony index (PSI) obtained from resting-state 19-channel electroencephalography.MethodsThis longitudinal observational study included patients with left frontal ischemic lesions admitted for post-acute rehabilitation. We recorded electroencephalograms at the time of admission. Recovery was defined as a change in composite speech score. Based on electrode settings, we focused on 4 language-related networks: (1) left front-temporal, (2) right front-temporal, (3) inter-frontal, and (4) inter-temporal networks. We first evaluated the correlation between these network PSIs and recovery scores and then the predictive potential of our method using the receiver operating characteristic curve and multivariable regression analyses.ResultsWe enrolled 24 patients. Electroencephalograms were recorded for a median of 37.0 days after the stroke. The median speech therapy time was 53.7 hours. Inter-temporal PSI (gamma band) was significantly positively correlated with recovery scores (ρ = .642; 95% confidence interval = 0.311-0.834; P = .017). The PSI could predict patients with good recovery (sensitivity = 84.6%; specificity = 90.9%), and the inter-temporal PSIs were useful in predicting recovery (adjusted R2 = .545).ConclusionsOur results revealed an association between the posterior language network adaptive response and speech recovery in patients with frontal lesions. The PSI may reflect post-stroke network alterations and may be a biomarker of aphasia recovery.

脑电相同步指数作为脑卒中后失语恢复的生物标志物。
中风后失语症被认为是一种语言网络障碍,神经成像可能有助于理解网络的改变。然而,预测失语症的恢复仍然具有挑战性。我们的目的是利用一种新的临床可行的方法来探索失语恢复的生物标志物,该方法包括静息状态19通道脑电图获得的相同步指数(PSI),我们之前报道过这种方法对评估运动恢复有用。方法本纵向观察研究纳入急性康复治疗的左额叶缺血性病变患者。我们在入院时记录脑电图。恢复被定义为复合语音评分的变化。基于电极设置,我们重点研究了4个与语言相关的网络:(1)左额颞叶网络,(2)右额颞叶网络,(3)额间网络,(4)颞间网络。我们首先评估了这些网络psi与恢复评分之间的相关性,然后使用受试者工作特征曲线和多变量回归分析评估了我们的方法的预测潜力。结果共入组24例患者。脑电图记录时间中位数为中风后37.0天。平均言语治疗时间为53.7小时。颞间PSI (γ波段)与恢复评分显著正相关(ρ = .642;95%置信区间= 0.311-0.834;p = .017)。PSI可以预测患者恢复良好(敏感性= 84.6%;特异性= 90.9%),颞间psi可用于预测恢复(调整后R2 = .545)。结论脑额叶病变患者的后侧语言网络适应性反应与言语功能恢复之间存在相关性。PSI可能反映中风后网络的改变,可能是失语恢复的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信