Study of the ideal insertion point and angle for the antegrade posterior column screw with the anterior approach in acetabular fracture.

Shiro Fukuoka, Masanori Yorimitsu, Tomoyuki Noda, Toshifumi Ozaki
{"title":"Study of the ideal insertion point and angle for the antegrade posterior column screw with the anterior approach in acetabular fracture.","authors":"Shiro Fukuoka, Masanori Yorimitsu, Tomoyuki Noda, Toshifumi Ozaki","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For acetabular fractures of both columns, the antegrade posterior column screw (APCS) is often inserted via the anterior intrapelvic approach to stabilize both columns. Insertion of the APCS can be technically demanding due to the complex anatomy of the posterior column. Misdirection or mispositioning of the screw during surgery can result in penetrate the hip joint or damage the neurovascular structures. The purpose of this study was to detect the ideal insertion point and angles of the APCS based on anatomical landmarks that can be directly identified intraoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the pelvic CT of 50 adults who underwent serial slice CT imaging. Three reference plane was determined using image analysis software; (1) iliac plane (IP), which contains the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), the anterior margin of sacroiliac joint (AMS), and the posterior margin of pubic symphysis (PMS), (2) pelvic inlet plane (PIP), which contains the AMS of both sides, and the PMS, (3) sagittal midline plane of the pelvis (SMP). The ideal insertion point and angles of the APCS, and its maximum length were measured. The ideal insertion point was measured on the line connecting ASIS and AMS (AA line) at a distance from AMS (APCS horizontal distance) and vertical distance from AA line (APCS vertical distance). The ideal angles were measured between the screw and the PIP and between the screw and the SMP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The APCS horizontal distance was 27.4 ± 6.4 mm. The APCS vertical distance was 1.6 ± 6.6 mm. The angle between the ideal APCS and yz-plane on the outlet view (α-angle) was 5.8 ± 5.8° The angle between the ideal APCS and y-axis on the xy-plane (β-angle) was 51.6 ± 5.0° The length of the APCS was 125.8 ± 9.5 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ideal insertion point detected as the distance from the AMS on the AA line and the ideal insertion angles relative to the PIP and the SMP may aid in proper insertion of the APCS during surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For acetabular fractures of both columns, the antegrade posterior column screw (APCS) is often inserted via the anterior intrapelvic approach to stabilize both columns. Insertion of the APCS can be technically demanding due to the complex anatomy of the posterior column. Misdirection or mispositioning of the screw during surgery can result in penetrate the hip joint or damage the neurovascular structures. The purpose of this study was to detect the ideal insertion point and angles of the APCS based on anatomical landmarks that can be directly identified intraoperatively.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the pelvic CT of 50 adults who underwent serial slice CT imaging. Three reference plane was determined using image analysis software; (1) iliac plane (IP), which contains the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), the anterior margin of sacroiliac joint (AMS), and the posterior margin of pubic symphysis (PMS), (2) pelvic inlet plane (PIP), which contains the AMS of both sides, and the PMS, (3) sagittal midline plane of the pelvis (SMP). The ideal insertion point and angles of the APCS, and its maximum length were measured. The ideal insertion point was measured on the line connecting ASIS and AMS (AA line) at a distance from AMS (APCS horizontal distance) and vertical distance from AA line (APCS vertical distance). The ideal angles were measured between the screw and the PIP and between the screw and the SMP.

Results: The APCS horizontal distance was 27.4 ± 6.4 mm. The APCS vertical distance was 1.6 ± 6.6 mm. The angle between the ideal APCS and yz-plane on the outlet view (α-angle) was 5.8 ± 5.8° The angle between the ideal APCS and y-axis on the xy-plane (β-angle) was 51.6 ± 5.0° The length of the APCS was 125.8 ± 9.5 mm.

Conclusion: The ideal insertion point detected as the distance from the AMS on the AA line and the ideal insertion angles relative to the PIP and the SMP may aid in proper insertion of the APCS during surgery.

髋臼骨折前路顺行后柱螺钉理想插入点及角度的探讨。
背景:对于髋臼双柱骨折,通常通过前骨盆内入路置入顺行后柱螺钉(APCS)以稳定两柱。由于后柱复杂的解剖结构,APCS的插入在技术上要求很高。手术中螺钉的错误方向或错误定位可导致穿透髋关节或损伤神经血管结构。本研究的目的是根据术中可直接识别的解剖标志来检测APCS的理想插入点和角度。方法:我们回顾性分析了50例接受连续层析CT成像的成人骨盆CT。利用图像分析软件确定三个参考平面;(1)髂平面(IP),包括髂前上棘(ASIS)、骶髂关节前缘(AMS)和耻骨联合后缘(PMS);(2)骨盆入口平面(PIP),包括两侧的骶髂关节前缘和耻骨联合;(3)骨盆矢状中线平面(SMP)。测量了APCS的理想插入点、角度和最大长度。在距AMS (APCS水平距离)的距离和距AA线(APCS垂直距离)的垂直距离上,在ASIS与AMS连接线(AA线)上测量理想插入点。测量螺钉与PIP之间以及螺钉与SMP之间的理想角度。结果:APCS水平距离为27.4±6.4 mm。APCS垂直距离为1.6±6.6 mm。理想的装甲运兵车和yz平面之间的夹角出口视图(α角)为5.8±5.8°理想的装甲运兵车和轴之间的角度在xy平面(β角)为51.6±5.0°装甲运兵车的长度是125.8±9.5 mm.Conclusion:理想的插入点检测到的距离在AA行AMS和理想的插入角度相对于PIP和SMP可能援助在装甲运兵车在手术过程中适当的插入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信