Effect of Plant Topping on Seasonal Development, Physiological Changes, and Grain Yield of Soybean.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Sora Lee, Chaelin Jo, Miri Choi, Jihyeon Lee, Nayoung Choi, Chaein Na
{"title":"Effect of Plant Topping on Seasonal Development, Physiological Changes, and Grain Yield of Soybean.","authors":"Sora Lee, Chaelin Jo, Miri Choi, Jihyeon Lee, Nayoung Choi, Chaein Na","doi":"10.3390/plants14132068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) is vulnerable to environmental stresses, such as heavy rainfall and high winds, which promote lodging and reduce plant performance during the monsoon season. To mitigate these issues, we evaluated the effects of plant topping, a practice involving the removal of apical buds, on plant architecture, physiological traits, and grain yield in four soybean cultivars over two growing seasons (2021-2022). Plant topping was performed at the V6-7 stage by cutting 30-35 cm above the ground. Plant topping reduced plant height by up to 23.5% and decreased leaf area index (by 8.0-16.4%), potentially improving light penetration into the lower canopy. Although chlorophyll concentration declined temporarily (297.8 vs. 272.8 mg m<sup>-2</sup> for non-topping vs. topping, respectively), NDVI remained stable, indicating delayed senescence. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters revealed cultivar-specific stress responses, particularly in Taegwang, which showed elevated ABS/RC, TR<sub>0</sub>/RC, and DI<sub>0</sub>/CS values under plant topping. Grain yield was generally unaffected, except in Jinpung, which increased by 34% under plant topping in 2021 (2701 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> vs. 3621 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> for non-topping vs. topping). In conclusion, plant topping may help improve canopy structure and light distribution without compromising yield, potentially reducing lodging risk and offering a cultivar-specific management strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":56267,"journal":{"name":"Plants-Basel","volume":"14 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12251880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plants-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14132068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max L.) is vulnerable to environmental stresses, such as heavy rainfall and high winds, which promote lodging and reduce plant performance during the monsoon season. To mitigate these issues, we evaluated the effects of plant topping, a practice involving the removal of apical buds, on plant architecture, physiological traits, and grain yield in four soybean cultivars over two growing seasons (2021-2022). Plant topping was performed at the V6-7 stage by cutting 30-35 cm above the ground. Plant topping reduced plant height by up to 23.5% and decreased leaf area index (by 8.0-16.4%), potentially improving light penetration into the lower canopy. Although chlorophyll concentration declined temporarily (297.8 vs. 272.8 mg m-2 for non-topping vs. topping, respectively), NDVI remained stable, indicating delayed senescence. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters revealed cultivar-specific stress responses, particularly in Taegwang, which showed elevated ABS/RC, TR0/RC, and DI0/CS values under plant topping. Grain yield was generally unaffected, except in Jinpung, which increased by 34% under plant topping in 2021 (2701 kg ha-1 vs. 3621 kg ha-1 for non-topping vs. topping). In conclusion, plant topping may help improve canopy structure and light distribution without compromising yield, potentially reducing lodging risk and offering a cultivar-specific management strategy.

摘顶对大豆季节发育、生理变化及籽粒产量的影响
大豆(Glycine max L.)在季风季节容易受到强降雨和大风等环境胁迫的影响,这些环境胁迫会导致倒伏,降低植株的生长性能。为了缓解这些问题,我们评估了四个大豆品种在2021-2022两个生长季节(2021-2022)的植株打顶(一种涉及去除顶芽的做法)对植株结构、生理性状和籽粒产量的影响。6 ~ 7期拔节,拔节距地面30 ~ 35 cm。打顶使株高降低23.5%,叶面积指数降低8.0 ~ 16.4%,潜在地提高了冠层下部的透光能力。虽然叶绿素浓度暂时下降(不打顶和打顶分别为297.8 mg m-2和272.8 mg m-2),但NDVI保持稳定,表明衰老延迟。叶绿素荧光参数显示了不同品种的胁迫响应,其中以大田品种为最,在拔节后ABS/RC、TR0/RC和DI0/CS值均有所升高。籽粒产量一般不受影响,但金丰在2021年进行了打顶,产量增加了34% (2701 kg hm -1比不打顶的3621 kg hm -1)。综上所述,打顶有助于在不影响产量的情况下改善冠层结构和光照分布,潜在地降低倒伏风险,并提供一种特定品种的管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plants-Basel
Plants-Basel Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2923
审稿时长
15.4 days
期刊介绍: Plants (ISSN 2223-7747), is an international and multidisciplinary scientific open access journal that covers all key areas of plant science. It publishes review articles, regular research articles, communications, and short notes in the fields of structural, functional and experimental botany. In addition to fundamental disciplines such as morphology, systematics, physiology and ecology of plants, the journal welcomes all types of articles in the field of applied plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信