Public perceptions of high-cost cancer drugs and the implications for reimbursement decisions.

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Youran Noh, Kyung-Bok Son
{"title":"Public perceptions of high-cost cancer drugs and the implications for reimbursement decisions.","authors":"Youran Noh, Kyung-Bok Son","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00659-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reimbursing high-cost cancer drugs presents challenges in managing uncertainty, setting appropriate prices, and controlling pharmaceutical expenditures. We examined the perspectives of the South Korean public on high-cost cancer drugs and policy options to improve reimbursement for these treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a self-rated, web-based survey from November to December 2023. We used a quota sampling method based on South Korean census data to recruit study participants. The questionnaire comprised four sections: socio-demographics, definitions of high-cost cancer drugs and reasons for their reimbursement, uncertainties associated with high-cost cancer drugs, and policy options to improve reimbursement for these treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 11,974 invitations sent, 1,000 participants completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 8.35%. Three-quarters of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that high-cost cancer drugs should be reimbursed. More than 70% accepted the need for price negotiations, even if they lead to drug withdrawals or delays in reimbursement decisions. A similar proportion agreed that new policy options, such as dual pricing and additional funding, should be introduced with caution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The South Korean public perceives the reimbursement of high-cost cancer drugs as both a human rights measure and a government responsibility. However, they support reimbursement only when they are confident that the drug is safe, effective, and cost-effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00659-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reimbursing high-cost cancer drugs presents challenges in managing uncertainty, setting appropriate prices, and controlling pharmaceutical expenditures. We examined the perspectives of the South Korean public on high-cost cancer drugs and policy options to improve reimbursement for these treatments.

Methods: We conducted a self-rated, web-based survey from November to December 2023. We used a quota sampling method based on South Korean census data to recruit study participants. The questionnaire comprised four sections: socio-demographics, definitions of high-cost cancer drugs and reasons for their reimbursement, uncertainties associated with high-cost cancer drugs, and policy options to improve reimbursement for these treatments.

Results: Of the 11,974 invitations sent, 1,000 participants completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 8.35%. Three-quarters of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that high-cost cancer drugs should be reimbursed. More than 70% accepted the need for price negotiations, even if they lead to drug withdrawals or delays in reimbursement decisions. A similar proportion agreed that new policy options, such as dual pricing and additional funding, should be introduced with caution.

Conclusion: The South Korean public perceives the reimbursement of high-cost cancer drugs as both a human rights measure and a government responsibility. However, they support reimbursement only when they are confident that the drug is safe, effective, and cost-effective.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

公众对高成本抗癌药物的看法及其对报销决策的影响。
背景:报销高成本的抗癌药物在管理不确定性、设定适当的价格和控制药品支出方面提出了挑战。我们研究了韩国公众对高成本癌症药物和政策选择的看法,以改善这些治疗的报销。方法:我们于2023年11月至12月进行了一项自评的网络调查。我们采用了基于韩国人口普查数据的配额抽样方法来招募研究参与者。问卷包括四个部分:社会人口统计学,高成本癌症药物的定义及其报销原因,与高成本癌症药物相关的不确定性,以及改善这些治疗报销的政策选择。结果:在发出的11974份邀请中,有1000名参与者完成了调查,回复率为8.35%。四分之三的受访者同意或强烈同意应该报销高成本的抗癌药物。超过70%的人认为有必要进行价格谈判,即使这会导致停药或延迟报销决定。类似比例的人同意,应谨慎采用双重定价和额外供资等新的政策选择。结论:韩国公众认为,高成本抗癌药物的报销既是一项人权措施,也是一项政府责任。然而,只有当他们确信药物是安全、有效和具有成本效益时,他们才支持报销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信