Standard operating procedures and learning curve analysis for surgical assistants in robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jianlu Zhang, Pengyu Li, Pan Zhang, Yajun Wang, Junchao Guo
{"title":"Standard operating procedures and learning curve analysis for surgical assistants in robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy.","authors":"Jianlu Zhang, Pengyu Li, Pan Zhang, Yajun Wang, Junchao Guo","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02574-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery (RPS) is increasingly adopted across institutions. While structured training and longitudinal skill acquisition are essential for optimal outcomes, the learning progression of surgical assistants in RPS remains inadequately characterized. This study presents our institution's standard operating procedures (SOP) for robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) developed through a single-team cohort experience and defines the assistant learning curve based on operative time, thereby establishing evidence-based benchmarks for RPS training programs. In this retrospective study, data of consecutive patients who underwent RDP in our team from November 2022 to March 2025 were analyzed. The assistant learning curve was constructed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time. The preoperative parameters, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative metrics were compared between phases. Ninety-one patients were included in this study. Based on operative time analysis, the learning curve was stratified into two distinct phases: the initial learning phase (cases 1-43) and subsequent proficiency phase (cases 44-91). Operative duration and estimated blood loss were significantly greater during the learning phase compared to the proficiency phase. Among patients scheduled for spleen-preserving RDP, while overall spleen preservation rates were comparable between phases, proficiency phase cases demonstrated significantly superior splenic vessel preservation rates. Our RDP-specific SOP demonstrates safety and efficacy, with assistant proficiency significantly improving after 43 cases under expert supervision. Quantified learning thresholds provide validated benchmarks for structured robotic surgery training programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02574-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery (RPS) is increasingly adopted across institutions. While structured training and longitudinal skill acquisition are essential for optimal outcomes, the learning progression of surgical assistants in RPS remains inadequately characterized. This study presents our institution's standard operating procedures (SOP) for robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) developed through a single-team cohort experience and defines the assistant learning curve based on operative time, thereby establishing evidence-based benchmarks for RPS training programs. In this retrospective study, data of consecutive patients who underwent RDP in our team from November 2022 to March 2025 were analyzed. The assistant learning curve was constructed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time. The preoperative parameters, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative metrics were compared between phases. Ninety-one patients were included in this study. Based on operative time analysis, the learning curve was stratified into two distinct phases: the initial learning phase (cases 1-43) and subsequent proficiency phase (cases 44-91). Operative duration and estimated blood loss were significantly greater during the learning phase compared to the proficiency phase. Among patients scheduled for spleen-preserving RDP, while overall spleen preservation rates were comparable between phases, proficiency phase cases demonstrated significantly superior splenic vessel preservation rates. Our RDP-specific SOP demonstrates safety and efficacy, with assistant proficiency significantly improving after 43 cases under expert supervision. Quantified learning thresholds provide validated benchmarks for structured robotic surgery training programs.

机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术中手术助理的标准操作程序和学习曲线分析。
机器人辅助胰腺手术(RPS)越来越多地被各机构采用。虽然结构化培训和纵向技能习得对于最佳结果至关重要,但RPS手术助理的学习进展仍然没有充分表征。本研究通过单组队列经验,介绍了我院机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术(RDP)的标准操作程序(SOP),并根据手术时间定义了辅助学习曲线,从而为RPS培训计划建立了基于证据的基准。在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了我们团队从2022年11月到2025年3月连续接受RDP的患者的数据。采用手术时间累积和(CUSUM)分析构建辅助学习曲线。比较两期术前参数、术中结果和术后指标。91例患者纳入本研究。根据手术时间分析,将学习曲线分为两个阶段:初始学习阶段(病例1-43)和随后的熟练阶段(病例44-91)。与熟练阶段相比,学习阶段的手术时间和估计失血量显著增加。在计划进行保脾RDP的患者中,虽然各阶段的总体脾脏保存率相当,但熟练期患者的脾血管保存率明显优于其他阶段。经过43例专家监督,我们的rdp特异性SOP显示出安全性和有效性,助手熟练程度显著提高。量化的学习阈值为结构化的机器人手术培训项目提供了有效的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信