Extravasations of non-cytotoxic drugs: A survey on pharmacist involvement in Spanish hospitals.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Inés Jiménez-Lozano, Jose Manuel Caro-Teller, Montserrat Pérez-Encinas, Helena Esteban Cartelle, Juan Manuel Rodríguez-Camacho, María José Fernández-Megía, Sergio Plata Paniagua, María José Otero
{"title":"Extravasations of non-cytotoxic drugs: A survey on pharmacist involvement in Spanish hospitals.","authors":"Inés Jiménez-Lozano, Jose Manuel Caro-Teller, Montserrat Pérez-Encinas, Helena Esteban Cartelle, Juan Manuel Rodríguez-Camacho, María José Fernández-Megía, Sergio Plata Paniagua, María José Otero","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2025.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the involvement of hospital pharmacists in the protocolization, management and clinical follow-up of non-cytotoxic drug extravasations in Spanish hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed through the SEFH email list using the REDCap® web platform. The characteristics of the participating hospitals, the availability of a protocol for managing non-cytotoxic drug extravasations, the healthcare professionals involved in developing the protocol, and the pharmacists' involvement and clinical follow-up in response to these incidents were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 complete responses were obtained from hospitals across 14 Autonomous Communities. Only 12 centers (13.5%) had a protocol that included recommendations for the extravasation of non-cytotoxic drugs, and in 11 (91.7%) of these, the pharmacist had participated in its development. The recommendations for extravasation management were mainly based on intrinsic drug properties such as pH and osmolarity, specific properties like vasoconstrictor drugs, or the classification of drugs as vesicants, irritants, or non-irritants. Wide variability was observed in recommendations regarding the application of cold or heat and hyaluronidase dosage. The decision to consult with pharmacy service regarding the management of extravasation depended largely on the individual nurse or physician's judgment, but 20 centers (22.5%) reported that they never received such consultations. A large proportion of Pharmacy Services (73.0%) reported that they participate in extravasation management by providing information by telephone, but 21 centers (23.6%) indicated that the pharmacist never participates in these adverse events. Limited involvement was also noted in the clinical assessment of the patient, follow-up of the extravasation, and documentation in the patient's medical history.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this survey reflect the limited standardization in the management of non-cytotoxic drug extravasations, as well as significant heterogeneity in the level of involvement of hospital pharmacists in these adverse events across hospitals in our country. The need to establish a national guideline or document on the management of non-cytotoxic drug extravasations is highlighted, along with the importance of promoting interdisciplinary collaboration to improve patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2025.06.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the involvement of hospital pharmacists in the protocolization, management and clinical follow-up of non-cytotoxic drug extravasations in Spanish hospitals.

Methods: A survey was distributed through the SEFH email list using the REDCap® web platform. The characteristics of the participating hospitals, the availability of a protocol for managing non-cytotoxic drug extravasations, the healthcare professionals involved in developing the protocol, and the pharmacists' involvement and clinical follow-up in response to these incidents were investigated.

Results: A total of 89 complete responses were obtained from hospitals across 14 Autonomous Communities. Only 12 centers (13.5%) had a protocol that included recommendations for the extravasation of non-cytotoxic drugs, and in 11 (91.7%) of these, the pharmacist had participated in its development. The recommendations for extravasation management were mainly based on intrinsic drug properties such as pH and osmolarity, specific properties like vasoconstrictor drugs, or the classification of drugs as vesicants, irritants, or non-irritants. Wide variability was observed in recommendations regarding the application of cold or heat and hyaluronidase dosage. The decision to consult with pharmacy service regarding the management of extravasation depended largely on the individual nurse or physician's judgment, but 20 centers (22.5%) reported that they never received such consultations. A large proportion of Pharmacy Services (73.0%) reported that they participate in extravasation management by providing information by telephone, but 21 centers (23.6%) indicated that the pharmacist never participates in these adverse events. Limited involvement was also noted in the clinical assessment of the patient, follow-up of the extravasation, and documentation in the patient's medical history.

Conclusion: The results of this survey reflect the limited standardization in the management of non-cytotoxic drug extravasations, as well as significant heterogeneity in the level of involvement of hospital pharmacists in these adverse events across hospitals in our country. The need to establish a national guideline or document on the management of non-cytotoxic drug extravasations is highlighted, along with the importance of promoting interdisciplinary collaboration to improve patient safety.

非细胞毒性药物外渗:西班牙医院药师参与调查。
目的:本研究旨在评价西班牙医院药师在非细胞毒性药物外渗的方案、管理和临床随访中的作用。方法:使用REDCap®网络平台通过SEFH电子邮件列表分发调查问卷。调查了参与医院的特点、非细胞毒性药物外渗管理方案的可得性、参与制定方案的保健专业人员以及药剂师的参与情况和应对这些事件的临床随访情况。结果:共获得来自14个自治区医院的89份完整回复。只有12个中心(13.5%)制定了包括非细胞毒性药物外渗建议的方案,其中11个中心(91.7%)的药剂师参与了方案的制定。外渗管理的建议主要基于药物的固有特性,如pH值和渗透压,血管收缩药物的特定特性,或药物的分类,如泡泡剂、刺激剂或非刺激剂。在应用冷或热和透明质酸酶剂量的建议中观察到广泛的差异。是否就外渗管理咨询药房服务很大程度上取决于护士或医生的个人判断,但20个中心(22.5%)报告他们从未接受过此类咨询。大部分药学服务机构(73.0%)报告称,他们通过电话提供信息参与了外渗管理,但21个中心(23.6%)表示药师从未参与这些不良事件。在患者的临床评估、外渗的随访和患者病史的记录中也注意到有限的介入。结论:本调查结果反映了我国各医院非细胞毒性药物外渗管理的规范化程度有限,以及医院药师参与非细胞毒性药物外渗不良事件的程度存在显著的异质性。报告强调,有必要制定一份关于非细胞毒性药物外渗管理的国家指南或文件,同时也强调了促进跨学科合作以改善患者安全的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信