Managing TBSRTC III thyroid nodules: evaluating repeat FNA, molecular testing, and surgery.

Q2 Medicine
Christopher Dilli, William Mi, Daniel L Miller
{"title":"Managing TBSRTC III thyroid nodules: evaluating repeat FNA, molecular testing, and surgery.","authors":"Christopher Dilli, William Mi, Daniel L Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.jasc.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thyroid nodules are common, but most are benign. Concerning nodules undergo fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and are classified using The Bethesda System. Nodules with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) [Bethesda III] have management options including surveillance, repeat FNA, molecular testing, and surgical evaluation. While molecular testing can reduce unnecessary surgeries, it is costly. This retrospective study assessed the feasibility of repeat FNA as a cost-effective alternative.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of AUS nodules from 5 hospitals between September 1, 2018, and March 1, 2024. Only initial FNA cases were included; pediatric cases and those lost to follow up were excluded. Nodules were stratified by initial diagnostic choice (repeat FNA, molecular testing, surgical intervention). Clinical and ultrasonography findings were reviewed to determine associations with malignancy rates. Costs were estimated based on Medicare reimbursement rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2649 nodules that underwent FNA, with 199 interpreted as AUS. Of these, 131 met the criteria. Repeat FNA resulted in a benign diagnosis in 48.7% of cases and AUS in 35.9%. Costs were lowest for nodules undergoing repeat FNA. There was no significant difference in rates of surgical intervention or malignancy compared to molecular testing. American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System categories were not associated with malignancy rates. Only echogenic foci were significantly associated with malignancy (P = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeat FNA resolved approximately 50% of cases, with no significant differences in malignancy or surgical intervention rates compared to molecular testing. Repeat FNA is the most cost-effective initial step for managing AUS nodules. Prebiopsy ultrasonography had limited utility in stratifying malignancy risk for AUS nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":38262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2025.05.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Thyroid nodules are common, but most are benign. Concerning nodules undergo fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and are classified using The Bethesda System. Nodules with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) [Bethesda III] have management options including surveillance, repeat FNA, molecular testing, and surgical evaluation. While molecular testing can reduce unnecessary surgeries, it is costly. This retrospective study assessed the feasibility of repeat FNA as a cost-effective alternative.

Materials and methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of AUS nodules from 5 hospitals between September 1, 2018, and March 1, 2024. Only initial FNA cases were included; pediatric cases and those lost to follow up were excluded. Nodules were stratified by initial diagnostic choice (repeat FNA, molecular testing, surgical intervention). Clinical and ultrasonography findings were reviewed to determine associations with malignancy rates. Costs were estimated based on Medicare reimbursement rates.

Results: We identified 2649 nodules that underwent FNA, with 199 interpreted as AUS. Of these, 131 met the criteria. Repeat FNA resulted in a benign diagnosis in 48.7% of cases and AUS in 35.9%. Costs were lowest for nodules undergoing repeat FNA. There was no significant difference in rates of surgical intervention or malignancy compared to molecular testing. American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System categories were not associated with malignancy rates. Only echogenic foci were significantly associated with malignancy (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Repeat FNA resolved approximately 50% of cases, with no significant differences in malignancy or surgical intervention rates compared to molecular testing. Repeat FNA is the most cost-effective initial step for managing AUS nodules. Prebiopsy ultrasonography had limited utility in stratifying malignancy risk for AUS nodules.

TBSRTC III型甲状腺结节的管理:评估重复FNA、分子检测和手术。
简介:甲状腺结节很常见,但大多数是良性的。有关的结节接受细针抽吸(FNA),并使用Bethesda系统进行分类。非典型性不确定意义(AUS)结节[Bethesda III]的治疗选择包括监测、重复FNA、分子检测和手术评估。虽然分子检测可以减少不必要的手术,但成本很高。本回顾性研究评估了重复FNA作为一种经济有效的替代方法的可行性。材料和方法:我们对2018年9月1日至2024年3月1日期间来自5家医院的AUS结节进行了多机构回顾性研究。只包括最初的FNA病例;排除了儿童病例和随访失败的病例。根据最初的诊断选择(重复FNA、分子检测、手术干预)对结节进行分层。我们回顾了临床和超声检查结果,以确定与恶性肿瘤发生率的关系。费用是根据医疗保险报销率估计的。结果:我们鉴定出2649例行FNA的结节,其中199例解释为AUS。其中,131人符合标准。重复FNA诊断为良性的病例占48.7%,AUS占35.9%。重复FNA治疗的费用最低。与分子检测相比,手术干预或恶性肿瘤的发生率无显著差异。美国放射学会甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统分类与恶性肿瘤发生率无关。只有回声灶与恶性肿瘤有显著相关性(P = 0.03)。结论:重复FNA解决了大约50%的病例,与分子检测相比,恶性肿瘤或手术干预率没有显着差异。重复FNA是治疗AUS结节最具成本效益的初始步骤。活检前超声检查在分级AUS结节恶性风险方面的应用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信