Accelerated brain magnetic resonance imaging with deep learning reconstruction: a comparative study on image quality in pediatric neuroimaging.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-12 DOI:10.1007/s00247-025-06314-2
Jae Won Choi, Yeon Jin Cho, Seul Bi Lee, Seunghyun Lee, Jae-Yeon Hwang, Young Hun Choi, Jung-Eun Cheon, Joonsung Lee
{"title":"Accelerated brain magnetic resonance imaging with deep learning reconstruction: a comparative study on image quality in pediatric neuroimaging.","authors":"Jae Won Choi, Yeon Jin Cho, Seul Bi Lee, Seunghyun Lee, Jae-Yeon Hwang, Young Hun Choi, Jung-Eun Cheon, Joonsung Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00247-025-06314-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial in pediatric radiology; however, the prolonged scan time is a major drawback that often requires sedation. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) is a promising method for accelerating MRI acquisition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical feasibility of accelerated brain MRI with DLR in pediatric neuroimaging, focusing on image quality compared to conventional MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 116 pediatric participants (mean age 7.9 ± 5.4 years) underwent routine brain MRI with three reconstruction methods: conventional MRI without DLR (C-MRI), conventional MRI with DLR (DLC-MRI), and accelerated MRI with DLR (DLA-MRI). Two pediatric radiologists independently assessed the overall image quality, sharpness, artifacts, noise, and lesion conspicuity. Quantitative image analysis included the measurement of image noise and coefficient of variation (CoV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLA-MRI reduced the scan time by 43% compared with C-MRI. Compared with C-MRI, DLA-MRI demonstrated higher scores for overall image quality, noise, and artifacts, as well as similar or higher scores for lesion conspicuity, but similar or lower scores for sharpness. DLC-MRI demonstrated the highest scores for all the parameters. Despite variations in image quality and lesion conspicuity, the lesion detection rates were 100% across all three reconstructions. Quantitative analysis revealed lower noise and CoV for DLA-MRI than those for C-MRI. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.72-0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLR enabled faster MRI with improved image quality compared with conventional MRI, highlighting its potential to address prolonged MRI scan times in pediatric neuroimaging and optimize clinical workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1903-1914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06314-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial in pediatric radiology; however, the prolonged scan time is a major drawback that often requires sedation. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) is a promising method for accelerating MRI acquisition.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical feasibility of accelerated brain MRI with DLR in pediatric neuroimaging, focusing on image quality compared to conventional MRI.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 116 pediatric participants (mean age 7.9 ± 5.4 years) underwent routine brain MRI with three reconstruction methods: conventional MRI without DLR (C-MRI), conventional MRI with DLR (DLC-MRI), and accelerated MRI with DLR (DLA-MRI). Two pediatric radiologists independently assessed the overall image quality, sharpness, artifacts, noise, and lesion conspicuity. Quantitative image analysis included the measurement of image noise and coefficient of variation (CoV).

Results: DLA-MRI reduced the scan time by 43% compared with C-MRI. Compared with C-MRI, DLA-MRI demonstrated higher scores for overall image quality, noise, and artifacts, as well as similar or higher scores for lesion conspicuity, but similar or lower scores for sharpness. DLC-MRI demonstrated the highest scores for all the parameters. Despite variations in image quality and lesion conspicuity, the lesion detection rates were 100% across all three reconstructions. Quantitative analysis revealed lower noise and CoV for DLA-MRI than those for C-MRI. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.72-0.97).

Conclusion: DLR enabled faster MRI with improved image quality compared with conventional MRI, highlighting its potential to address prolonged MRI scan times in pediatric neuroimaging and optimize clinical workflows.

加速脑磁共振成像与深度学习重建:儿童神经成像图像质量的比较研究。
背景:磁共振成像(MRI)在儿科放射学中至关重要;然而,长时间的扫描是一个主要的缺点,往往需要镇静。深度学习重建(DLR)是一种很有前途的加速MRI采集的方法。目的:评价DLR加速脑MRI在小儿神经影像学中的临床可行性,重点是与常规MRI相比的图像质量。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,116名儿童参与者(平均年龄7.9±5.4岁)接受了常规脑MRI,采用三种重建方法:常规MRI无DLR (C-MRI),常规MRI伴DLR (DLC-MRI)和加速MRI伴DLR (DLA-MRI)。两名儿科放射科医生独立评估了整体图像质量、清晰度、伪影、噪声和病变显著性。定量图像分析包括图像噪声和变异系数(CoV)测量。结果:与C-MRI相比,DLA-MRI的扫描时间缩短了43%。与C-MRI相比,DLA-MRI在整体图像质量、噪声和伪影方面得分更高,在病变显著性方面得分相似或更高,但在清晰度方面得分相似或更低。DLC-MRI显示所有参数得分最高。尽管图像质量和病变显著性存在差异,但三次重建的病变检出率均为100%。定量分析显示,DLA-MRI的噪声和冠状病毒比C-MRI低。观察者之间的一致几乎是完美的(加权科恩kappa = 0.72-0.97)。结论:与传统MRI相比,DLR使MRI成像速度更快,图像质量提高,突出了其解决儿童神经成像MRI扫描时间延长和优化临床工作流程的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信