Intravitreal versus Subcutaneous Adalimumab in Active Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mahdi M Hassoun, Ziyad R Mahfoud, Rachid Istambouli, Ahmad M Mansour, Haytham Salti, Souha Allam, Alaa Bou Ghannam, Rola N Hamam
{"title":"Intravitreal versus Subcutaneous Adalimumab in Active Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.","authors":"Mahdi M Hassoun, Ziyad R Mahfoud, Rachid Istambouli, Ahmad M Mansour, Haytham Salti, Souha Allam, Alaa Bou Ghannam, Rola N Hamam","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2526692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous adalimumab (SCA) versus intravitreal adalimumab (IVA) in treating active non-infectious uveitis (NIU).<b>Methods</b>: This single-center, phase 2 non-inferiority randomized controlled trial included patients with active NIU assigned to receive either SCA (80 mg loading dose, then 40 mg every 2 weeks) or IVA (1.5 mg at baseline, then every 4 weeks). Follow-ups occurred weekly for the first 2 weeks, then every 4 weeks until 26 weeks. Primary outcomes were changes in anterior chamber cell (AC) and vitreous haze (VH) grades at 26 weeks (non-inferiority margin: 0.5). Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), fluorescein angiography (FA) score, and oral prednisone dose.<b>Results</b>: A total of 23 patients (43 eyes) were randomized into the SCA (<i>n</i> = 12) or IVA (<i>n</i> = 11) treatment group. IVA was found to be non-inferior to SCA. The upper limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in AC grade change (-0.33 [-0.79 to 0.38], <i>p</i> = 0.440) and VH grade change (-0.34 [-1.15 to 0.47], <i>p</i> = 0.490) remained below the noninferiority margin of + 0.5 grade. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups for secondary outcomes, including changes in BCVA (<i>p</i> = 0.594), CRT (<i>p</i> = 0.607), FA score (<i>p</i> = 0.318), and oral prednisone dose (<i>p</i> = 0.881). No serious systemic or ocular adverse events (AE) were observed. SCA resulted in a higher number of non-serious systemic AE (21) compared to IVA (5).<b>Conclusions</b>: IVA was non-inferior to SCA in treating active NIU and resulted in fewer systemic adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2526692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous adalimumab (SCA) versus intravitreal adalimumab (IVA) in treating active non-infectious uveitis (NIU).Methods: This single-center, phase 2 non-inferiority randomized controlled trial included patients with active NIU assigned to receive either SCA (80 mg loading dose, then 40 mg every 2 weeks) or IVA (1.5 mg at baseline, then every 4 weeks). Follow-ups occurred weekly for the first 2 weeks, then every 4 weeks until 26 weeks. Primary outcomes were changes in anterior chamber cell (AC) and vitreous haze (VH) grades at 26 weeks (non-inferiority margin: 0.5). Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), fluorescein angiography (FA) score, and oral prednisone dose.Results: A total of 23 patients (43 eyes) were randomized into the SCA (n = 12) or IVA (n = 11) treatment group. IVA was found to be non-inferior to SCA. The upper limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in AC grade change (-0.33 [-0.79 to 0.38], p = 0.440) and VH grade change (-0.34 [-1.15 to 0.47], p = 0.490) remained below the noninferiority margin of + 0.5 grade. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups for secondary outcomes, including changes in BCVA (p = 0.594), CRT (p = 0.607), FA score (p = 0.318), and oral prednisone dose (p = 0.881). No serious systemic or ocular adverse events (AE) were observed. SCA resulted in a higher number of non-serious systemic AE (21) compared to IVA (5).Conclusions: IVA was non-inferior to SCA in treating active NIU and resulted in fewer systemic adverse events.

玻璃体内与皮下阿达木单抗治疗活动性非感染性葡萄膜炎:一项随机非劣效性试验。
目的:比较皮下阿达木单抗(SCA)与玻璃体内阿达木单抗(IVA)治疗活动性非感染性葡萄膜炎(NIU)的临床疗效和安全性。方法:该单中心2期非劣效性随机对照试验纳入了活动性NIU患者,他们被分配接受SCA(负荷剂量80 mg,然后每2周40 mg)或IVA(基线时1.5 mg,然后每4周)。前2周每周随访一次,之后每4周随访一次,直至26周。主要结局是26周时前房细胞(AC)和玻璃体雾霾(VH)等级的变化(非劣效性边缘:0.5)。次要结果包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中央视网膜厚度(CRT)、荧光素血管造影(FA)评分和口服强的松剂量。结果:23例患者(43只眼)随机分为SCA组(n = 12)和IVA组(n = 11)。发现IVA不逊于SCA。AC分级变化差异的90%置信区间(CI)上限(-0.33[-0.79至0.38],p = 0.440)和VH分级变化(-0.34[-1.15至0.47],p = 0.490)仍低于+ 0.5分级的非劣效性界限。两组患者的次要结局包括BCVA (p = 0.594)、CRT (p = 0.607)、FA评分(p = 0.318)、口服强的松剂量(p = 0.881)的变化无显著差异。未观察到严重的全身或眼部不良事件(AE)。与IVA相比,SCA导致了更多的非严重系统性AE(21例)。结论:IVA治疗活动性NIU的效果不逊于SCA,且导致的全身不良事件较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信