Mahdi M Hassoun, Ziyad R Mahfoud, Rachid Istambouli, Ahmad M Mansour, Haytham Salti, Souha Allam, Alaa Bou Ghannam, Rola N Hamam
{"title":"Intravitreal versus Subcutaneous Adalimumab in Active Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.","authors":"Mahdi M Hassoun, Ziyad R Mahfoud, Rachid Istambouli, Ahmad M Mansour, Haytham Salti, Souha Allam, Alaa Bou Ghannam, Rola N Hamam","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2526692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous adalimumab (SCA) versus intravitreal adalimumab (IVA) in treating active non-infectious uveitis (NIU).<b>Methods</b>: This single-center, phase 2 non-inferiority randomized controlled trial included patients with active NIU assigned to receive either SCA (80 mg loading dose, then 40 mg every 2 weeks) or IVA (1.5 mg at baseline, then every 4 weeks). Follow-ups occurred weekly for the first 2 weeks, then every 4 weeks until 26 weeks. Primary outcomes were changes in anterior chamber cell (AC) and vitreous haze (VH) grades at 26 weeks (non-inferiority margin: 0.5). Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), fluorescein angiography (FA) score, and oral prednisone dose.<b>Results</b>: A total of 23 patients (43 eyes) were randomized into the SCA (<i>n</i> = 12) or IVA (<i>n</i> = 11) treatment group. IVA was found to be non-inferior to SCA. The upper limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in AC grade change (-0.33 [-0.79 to 0.38], <i>p</i> = 0.440) and VH grade change (-0.34 [-1.15 to 0.47], <i>p</i> = 0.490) remained below the noninferiority margin of + 0.5 grade. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups for secondary outcomes, including changes in BCVA (<i>p</i> = 0.594), CRT (<i>p</i> = 0.607), FA score (<i>p</i> = 0.318), and oral prednisone dose (<i>p</i> = 0.881). No serious systemic or ocular adverse events (AE) were observed. SCA resulted in a higher number of non-serious systemic AE (21) compared to IVA (5).<b>Conclusions</b>: IVA was non-inferior to SCA in treating active NIU and resulted in fewer systemic adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2526692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous adalimumab (SCA) versus intravitreal adalimumab (IVA) in treating active non-infectious uveitis (NIU).Methods: This single-center, phase 2 non-inferiority randomized controlled trial included patients with active NIU assigned to receive either SCA (80 mg loading dose, then 40 mg every 2 weeks) or IVA (1.5 mg at baseline, then every 4 weeks). Follow-ups occurred weekly for the first 2 weeks, then every 4 weeks until 26 weeks. Primary outcomes were changes in anterior chamber cell (AC) and vitreous haze (VH) grades at 26 weeks (non-inferiority margin: 0.5). Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), fluorescein angiography (FA) score, and oral prednisone dose.Results: A total of 23 patients (43 eyes) were randomized into the SCA (n = 12) or IVA (n = 11) treatment group. IVA was found to be non-inferior to SCA. The upper limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in AC grade change (-0.33 [-0.79 to 0.38], p = 0.440) and VH grade change (-0.34 [-1.15 to 0.47], p = 0.490) remained below the noninferiority margin of + 0.5 grade. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups for secondary outcomes, including changes in BCVA (p = 0.594), CRT (p = 0.607), FA score (p = 0.318), and oral prednisone dose (p = 0.881). No serious systemic or ocular adverse events (AE) were observed. SCA resulted in a higher number of non-serious systemic AE (21) compared to IVA (5).Conclusions: IVA was non-inferior to SCA in treating active NIU and resulted in fewer systemic adverse events.
期刊介绍:
Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.