Sublingual Ketamine as Breakthrough Analgesia in Patients with Advanced Cancer-A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Repeated Cross-over Trial.

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yi-Ching Lee, Emma Zhao, Kenny Kwon Ho Lee, Wei Lee, Alix Dumitrescu, John Loadsman, Robert Sanders, Timothy Brake, Andy Yi-Yang Wang
{"title":"Sublingual Ketamine as Breakthrough Analgesia in Patients with Advanced Cancer-A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Repeated Cross-over Trial.","authors":"Yi-Ching Lee, Emma Zhao, Kenny Kwon Ho Lee, Wei Lee, Alix Dumitrescu, John Loadsman, Robert Sanders, Timothy Brake, Andy Yi-Yang Wang","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2531008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study aimed to determine feasibility of a larger definitive study evaluating sublingual ketamine efficacy as first-line breakthrough analgesia for moderate-to-severe pain in advanced cancer. This prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, repeated cross-over trial included patients (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe pain from advanced cancer requiring opioid analgesia, randomized to weekly-alternating treatment sequences (APAPAP, APAPPA, APPAAP, APPAPA, PAAPAP, PAAPPA, PAPAAP, PAPAPA; A = sublingual ketamine, P = placebo). The primary outcome was attrition rate, measured by completion of two treatment cycles over 12-months. Of 64 patients referred, 29 were randomized, 11 received intervention. The pre-determined criterion of 24 patients completing 2-cycles over 12-months was not met. Most patients perceived receiving active drugs in placebo (0.71) and active (0.67) periods. Ketamine scored higher than placebo for pain reduction, perceived to be more efficacious than usual breakthrough analgesia, and increased quality-of-life scores. This study design will be infeasible for a larger trial due to a high attrition rate. The patients' inability to discriminate between the placebo versus active medication and the minimal adverse effects suggested that the chosen dose was possibly too low. The potential issue of disease progression over the study period suggests that further target population refinement should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2531008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to determine feasibility of a larger definitive study evaluating sublingual ketamine efficacy as first-line breakthrough analgesia for moderate-to-severe pain in advanced cancer. This prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, repeated cross-over trial included patients (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe pain from advanced cancer requiring opioid analgesia, randomized to weekly-alternating treatment sequences (APAPAP, APAPPA, APPAAP, APPAPA, PAAPAP, PAAPPA, PAPAAP, PAPAPA; A = sublingual ketamine, P = placebo). The primary outcome was attrition rate, measured by completion of two treatment cycles over 12-months. Of 64 patients referred, 29 were randomized, 11 received intervention. The pre-determined criterion of 24 patients completing 2-cycles over 12-months was not met. Most patients perceived receiving active drugs in placebo (0.71) and active (0.67) periods. Ketamine scored higher than placebo for pain reduction, perceived to be more efficacious than usual breakthrough analgesia, and increased quality-of-life scores. This study design will be infeasible for a larger trial due to a high attrition rate. The patients' inability to discriminate between the placebo versus active medication and the minimal adverse effects suggested that the chosen dose was possibly too low. The potential issue of disease progression over the study period suggests that further target population refinement should be considered.

舌下氯胺酮作为晚期癌症患者突破性镇痛的可行性随机对照重复交叉试验。
本初步研究旨在确定一项更大的确定性研究的可行性,评估舌下氯胺酮作为治疗晚期癌症中至重度疼痛的一线突破性镇痛药的疗效。这项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、重复交叉试验纳入了需要阿片类镇痛的晚期癌症患者(≥18岁),随机分为每周交替的治疗顺序(APAPAP、APAPPA、APPAAP、APPAPA、PAAPAP、PAAPPA、PAPAAP、PAPAPA;A =舌下氯胺酮,P =安慰剂)。主要结果是损耗率,通过在12个月内完成两个治疗周期来测量。在64例患者中,29例随机分组,11例接受干预。在12个月内完成2个周期的24例患者未达到预定标准。大多数患者认为在安慰剂期(0.71)和活动期(0.67)接受了有效药物。氯胺酮在减轻疼痛方面的得分高于安慰剂,被认为比通常的突破性镇痛更有效,并提高了生活质量得分。由于高损耗率,本研究设计不适用于更大规模的试验。患者无法区分安慰剂和活性药物以及最小的副作用,这表明所选择的剂量可能太低。研究期间疾病进展的潜在问题表明,应考虑进一步细化目标人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信